Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 277–299

Integrating sciences by creating new disciplines: The case of cell biology

  • William Bechtel


Many studies of the unification of science focus on the theories of different disciplines. The model for integration is the theory reduction model. This paper argues that the embodiment of theories in scientists, and the institutions in which scientists work and the instruments they employ, are critical to the sort of integration that actually occurs in science. This paper examines the integration of scientific endeavors that emerged in cell biology in the period after World War II when the development of cell fractionation and electron microscopy made serious investigations of cell organelles possible. One surprising feature of such integration is that it generated further disintegration as the new institutions of cell biology separated the practitioners of the new discipline from other, closely related biological disciplines.

Key words

Cell biology reduction instruments research techniques scientific institutions 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abir-Am, P.: 1987, ‘The Biotheoretical Gathering, Trans-disciplinary Authority and the Incipient Legitimation of Molecular Biology in the 1930s: New Perspectives on the Historical Sociology of Science’,History of Science 25, 1–70.Google Scholar
  2. Abrahamsen, A.A.: 1987, ‘Bridging Boundaries versus Breaking Boundaries: Psycholinguistics in Perspective’,Synthese 72, 355–388.Google Scholar
  3. Bechtel, W.: 1984, ‘The Evolution of our Understanding of the Cell: A Study in the Dynamics of Scientific Progress’,Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 15, 309–356.Google Scholar
  4. Bechtel, W.: 1986a, ‘Biochemistry: A Cross-disciplinary Endeavor that Discovered a Distinctive Domain’, in W. Bechtel (ed.),Integrating Scientific Disciplines, Matinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 77–100.Google Scholar
  5. Bechtel, W.: 1986b, ‘The Nature of Scientific Integration’, in W. Bechtel (ed.),Integrating Scientific Disciplines, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 3–52.Google Scholar
  6. Bechtel, W.: 1990, ‘Scientific Evidence: Creating and Evaluating Experimental Instruments and Research Techniques,’ in A. Fine and L. Wessels (eds.),PSA 1990, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
  7. Bechtel, W. and Richardson, R.C.: 1992,Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  8. Bensley, R.R., and Hoerr, N.: 1934, ‘Studies on Cell Structure by the Freeze-Drying Method. VI. The Preparation and Properties of Mitochondria’,Anatomical Record 60, 449–455.Google Scholar
  9. Bernhard, W., Haguenau, F., Gautier A. and Oberling, C.: 1952,Z. Zellforschung und mikr. Anat. 37, 281.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P.: 1975, ‘The Specificity of the Scientific Field and the Social Conditions of the Progress of Reason’,Social Science Information 14, 19–47.Google Scholar
  11. Bourne, G.: 1942,Cytology and Cell Physiology, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Buchner, E.: 1897, ‘Alcoholische Gährung ohne Hefezellen’,Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft 30, 117–124.Google Scholar
  13. Campbell, D.T.: 1969, ‘Ethnocentrism of Disciplines and the Fish-scale Model of Omnipotence’, in M. Sherif and C.W. Sherif (eds.),Interdisciplinary Relationships in the Social Sciences, Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.Google Scholar
  14. Causey, R.L.: 1977,Unity of Science, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  15. Churchland, P.S.: 1986,Neurophilosophy, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  16. Claude, A.: 1941, ‘Particulate components of cytoplasm’,Cold Springs Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 9, 263–271.Google Scholar
  17. Claude, A.: 1943, ‘An Electron Microscope Study of Isolated Mitochondria. Method and Preliminary Results’,Journal of Experimental Medicine 81, 51–60.Google Scholar
  18. Claude, A.: 1947–48, ‘Studies on Cells: Morphology, Chemical Constitution, and Distribution of Biochemical Functions’,Harvey Lectures 43, 121–164.Google Scholar
  19. Dalton, A.J.: 1953, ‘Electron Microscopy of Tissue Sections’,International Review of Cytology 2, 403–417.Google Scholar
  20. Darden, L.: 1986, ‘Relations Among Fields in the Evolutionary Synthesis’ in W. Bechtel (ed.),Integrating Scientific Disciplines, Nijhoff, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  21. Darden, L. and Maull, N.: 1977, ‘Interfield Theoreies’,Philosophy of Science 43, 44–64.Google Scholar
  22. De Robertis, E.D.P., Nowinski, W.W., and Saez, Francisco A.: 1948,General Cytology, W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  23. De Robertis, E.D.P., Nowinski, W.W., and Saez, Francisco A.: 1954,General Cytology, Second Edition, W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  24. De Robertis, E.D.P., Nowinski, W.W., and Saez, Francisco A.: 1960,General Cytology, Third edition, W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  25. De Robertis, E.D.P., Nowinski, W.W., and Saez, Francisco A.: 1965,Cell Biology, W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  26. Gray, J.: 1931,Experimental Cytology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  27. Green, D.E., Loomis, W.F. and Auerbach, V.H.: 1948, ‘Studies on the Cyclophorase System I’,Journal of Biological Chemistry 172, 389–403.Google Scholar
  28. Hogeboom, G.H., Claude, A. and Hotchkiss, R.: 1946, ‘The Distribution of Cytochrome Oxidase and Succinoxidase in the Cytoplasm of the Mammalian Liver Cell’,Journal of Biological Chemistry 165, 615–629.Google Scholar
  29. Hull, D.L.: 1988,Science as a Process. An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  30. Keilin, D. and Hartree, E.F.: 1940, ‘Succinic Dehydrogenase-Cytochrome System of Cells. Intracellular Respiratory System Catalysing Aerobic Oxidation of Succinic Acid’,Proceedings of the Royal Society (London) B129, 277–306.Google Scholar
  31. Keilin, D. and Hartree, E.F.: 1949, ‘Activity of the Succinic Dehydrogenase-cytochrome System in Different Tissue Preparations’,Biochemical Journal 44, 205–218.Google Scholar
  32. Kingsbury, B.F.: 1912, ‘Cytoplasmic Fixation’,Anatomical Record 6, 39–52.Google Scholar
  33. Knoor-Cetina, K.: 1980,The Manufacture of Knowledge, Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  34. Latour, B.: 1987,Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  35. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S.: 1979,Laboratory Life, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  36. Lehninger, A.L.: 1951, ‘The Organized Respiratory Activity of Isolated Rat Liver Mitochondria, in J.T. Edsall (ed.),Enzymes and Enzyme Systems, Harvard, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  37. Maull, N.: 1977, ‘Unifying Science Without Reduction’,Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 8, 143–162.Google Scholar
  38. Mullins, N.: 1972, ‘The Development of a Scientific Specialty: The Phage Group and the Origins of Molecular Biology’,Minerva 10, 51–82.Google Scholar
  39. Nagel, E.: 1961,The Structure of Science, Harcourt, Brace, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Palade, G.E.: 1953a, ‘An Electron Microscope Study of the Mitochondrial Structure’,Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 1, 188–211.Google Scholar
  41. Palade, G.E.: 1953b, ‘A Small Particulate Component of the Cytoplasm’,Journal of Applied Physics 24, 1419.Google Scholar
  42. Palade, G.E.: 1987, ‘Cell Fractionation’, in J.E. Pauly (ed.),The American Association of Anatomists, 1888–1987. Essays on the History of Anatomy in America and a Report on the Membership — Past and Present, Wilkin and Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  43. Palade, G.E. and Siekevitz, P.: 1956a, ‘Liver Microsomes" An Integrated Morphological and Biochemical Study’,Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology 2, 171–200.Google Scholar
  44. Palade, G.E. and Siekevitz, P.: 1956b, ‘Pancreatic Microsomes: An Integrated Morphological and Biochemical Study’,Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology 2, 671–690.Google Scholar
  45. Porter, K.R., Claude, A. and Fullam, E.: 1945, ‘A Study of Tissue Culture Cells by Electron Microscopy: Methods and Preliminary Observations’,Journal of Experimental Medicine 81, 233–246.Google Scholar
  46. Porter, K.R. and Kallman, F.L.: 1952, ‘Significance of Cell Particulates as Seen by Electron Microscopy’,Annals of the New York Academy of Science 54, 882–891.Google Scholar
  47. Porter, K.R. and Blum, J.: 1953, ‘A Study of Microtomy for Electron Microscopy’,Anatomical Record 117, 685–710.Google Scholar
  48. Schmitt, F.O.: 1944–1945, ‘Ultrastructure and the Problems of Cellular Organization’,The Harvey Lectures 40, 249–268.Google Scholar
  49. Shapere, D.: 1984,Reason and the Search for Knowledge, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  50. Sjöstrand, F.S.: 1953, ‘Electron Microscopy of Mitochondria and Cytoplasmic Double Membranes’,Nature 171, 30–32.Google Scholar
  51. Sjöstrand, F.S.: 1956, ‘The Ultrastructure of Cells as Revealed by the Electron Microscope’,International Review of Cytology 5, 455–533.Google Scholar
  52. Slautterback, W.C.: 1953, ‘Electron Microscopic Studies of Small Particles (Microsomes)’,Experimental Cell Research 5, 173–186.Google Scholar
  53. Warburg, O.: 1913, ‘Über sauerstoffatmende Kornchen aus Leberzellen und über Sauerstoffatmung in Berkfeld-Filtraten wasseriger Leberextrakte’,Pfluger's Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere 154, 599–617.Google Scholar
  54. Whitley, R.: 1984,The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  55. Wimsatt, W.C.: 1976, ‘Reductionism, Levels of Organization, and the Mind-body problem’, in G. Globus, G. Maxwell and I. Savodnik (eds.),Consciousness and the Brain: A Scientific and Philosophical Inquiry, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Bechtel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyGeorgia State University University PlazaAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations