Pediatric Nephrology

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 68–74 | Cite as

Continent urinary diversion and bladder augmentation in children: the Mainz pouch procedure

  • H. Riedmiller
  • J. Thüroff
  • M. Stöckle
  • O. Schofer
  • R. Hohenfellner
Original Article

Abstract

The formation of a bowel reservoir of large capacity at low pressure by using small and large bowel (ileocaecal segment) has proved reliable for achieving continent urinary diversion (n=80), for bladder augmentation (n=42) as well as for total bladder replacement (n=24). Encouraged by the results we obtained in our adult patients, we have used this technique during the last 3.5 years in 29 children. Indications for urinary diversions in children have been: neurogenic bladder with diplegia (n=8), bladder exstrophy (n=2), traumatic loss of the bladder (n=1), urogenital sinus (n=1) and rhabdomyosarcoma of the prostate or bladder (n=2). Bladder augmentation was indicated in 6 children with iatrogenic bladder loss, in 5 children with neurogenic bladder without diplegia and in 4 boys with incontinent epispadias or exstrophy. In children with bladder exstrophy or incontinent epispadias, continence was achieved using a modified Young-Dees technique with formation of a long intra-abdominal muscular tube made out of the bladder plate or the low-capacity bladder. The capacity of the urinary reservoir was guaranteed by bladder augmentation or bladder replacement with an ileocaecal pouch. During a mean follow-up period of 26 months (bladder augmentation) and 21 months (continent diversion) there was only one postoperative complication (intussusception ileus) which required operative revision. Two children had to undergo reoperation because of nipple problems. Follow-up, with monitoring of biochemical and metabolic parameters, is necessary to show whether this technique will provide a long-term successful solution for these problems.

Key words

Continent urinary diversion Bladder augmentation Young-Dees technique, modified Ileocaecal pouch Iatrogenic bladder loss, therapy of 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Winter CC (1984) Overview: caution needed in cystoplasty. In: Whithead ED, Leiter E (eds) Current operative urology, 2nd edn. Harper and Row, Philadelphia, p 837Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Olsson CA (1984) Editorial: Continent urinary diversion. J Urol 132: 1157Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thüroff JW, Alken P, Engelmann U, Riedmiller H, Jacobi G, Hohenfellner R (1985) Der MAINZ-Pouch zur Blasenerweiterungsplastik und kontinenten Harnableitung. Aktuel Urol 16: 1Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thüroff JW, Alken P, Engelmann U, Riedmiller H, Jacobi G, Hohenfellner R (1986) The MAINZ-pouch (mixed augmentation ileum and cecum) for bladder augmentation and continent diversion. J Urol 136: 17Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Altwein JE, Hohenfellner R (1975) Use of the colon as a conduit for urinary diversion. Surg Gynecol Obstet 140: 33Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mansson W, Colleen S, Sundin T (1984) Continent cecal reservoir in urinary diversion. Br J Urol 56: 359Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hohenfellner R, Marberger M (1976) Colon conduit. In: Bergsma D, Duckett WD (eds) Urinary system malformation in children. Proceedings of the International Pediatric Urology Seminar, Philadelphia. Liss, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hohenfellner R, Marberger M (1976) Open transcolonic ureterosigmoidostomy. In: Bergsma D, Duckett WD (eds) Urinary system malformation in children. Proceedings of the International Pediatric Urology Seminar, Philadelphia. Liss, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hinman F Jr (1989) Selection of intestinal segments of bladder substitution. J Urol (in press)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wilbert D, Hohenfellner R (1984) Colonic conduit: preoperative requirements, operative technique, postoperative management. World J Urol 2: 159Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Riedmiller H, Becht E, Hertle L, Jacobi G, Hohenfellner R (1984) Psoas-hitch ureteroneocystostomy: experience with 181 cases. Eur Urol 10: 145Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roehrborn CG, Teigland DM, Sagalowsky AI, Markey K (1986) Comparative urodynamic assessment in patients with four different forms of urinary diversion. J Urol 135: 155AGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Braren V, Workman CH, Johns OT, Brooks AL, Rhamy RK (1979) Use of the umbilical area for placement of an urinary stoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 148: 543Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hanna MK, Bloiso G (1987) Continent diversion in children, modification of Kock-pouch. J Urol 137: 1206Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Colodny HC (1974) Bladder injury during herniorrhaphy manifested by ascites and azotemia. Urology 3: 89Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Redman JF, Jacks DW, O'Donnell PD (1985) Cystectomy: a catastrophic complication of herniorrhaphy. J Urol 133: 97Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reifferscheid R, Eckstein HB, Flach A, Rager K (1973) Wandnekrosen der harnblase des Neugeborenen als Komplikation eines Nabelkatheters. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 98: 727Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mihatsch MJ, Ohnacker H, Herzog B, Goldschmidt H (1974) Bladder necrosis caused by use of than in a newborn infant. J Urol 111: 835Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hendren WH (1978) Some alternatives to urinary diversion in children. J Urol 119: 652Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IPNA 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Riedmiller
    • 1
  • J. Thüroff
    • 1
  • M. Stöckle
    • 1
  • O. Schofer
    • 2
  • R. Hohenfellner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of UrologyJohannes Gutenberg University, Medical SchoolMainzFederal Republic of Germany
  2. 2.Department of PaediatricsJohannes Gutenberg University, Medical SchoolMainzFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations