Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 129–165 | Cite as

Anatomy, metaphysics, and values: The ape brain debate reconsidered

  • Christopher Cosans


Conventional wisdom teaches that Thomas Huxley discredited Richard Owen in their debate over ape and human brains. This paper reexamines the dispute and uses it as a test case for evaluating the metaphysical realist, internal realist, and social constructivist theories of scientific knowledge. Since Owen worked in the Kantian tradition, his anatomical research illustrates the implications of internal realism for scientific practice. As an avowed Cartesian, Huxley offered a well developed attack on Owen's position from a metaphysical realist perspective. Adrian Desmond's political retrospective on the dispute affords the additional opportunity to contrast internal realism with social constructivism. I argue that since Huxley ultimately based his attack on his valuing Europeans as superior to blacks, his argument illustrates the hazards of accepting the metaphysical realist promise of value free science. Desmond overlooks this racial dimension of the dispute, and his work shows how social constructivism can distract the historian and philosopher from even the social meaning of science. As internal realists like Putnam have argued, values enter science not from without, but from within the very process of science itself.

Key words

Metaphysical realism internal realism social constructivism Thomas Huxley Richard Owen organism development teleology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cosans, C.: 1991, ‘An Anatomical Analysis of the Owen-Huxley Debate’, Meeting of the Society for History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Biology, 13 July 1991.Google Scholar
  2. Darwin, C.: 1859,On the Origin of Species, a facsmile of the first edition, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  3. Deacon, T.: 1990, ‘Problems of Ontogeny and Phylogeny in Brain-Size Evolution’,International Journal of Primatology 11, 237–282.Google Scholar
  4. Descartes, R.: 1983, ‘Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting the Reason and Seeking for Truth in the Sciences’, translated by E. Haldane and G. Ross, inThe Philosophical Works of Descartes, New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Desmond, A.: 1982,Archetypes and Ancestors, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Desmond, A.: 1989,The Politics of Evolution, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Eisenberg, J.F.: 1981,The Mammalian Radiations, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gould, S.J.: 1981,The Mismeasure of Man, New York, W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  9. Hanson, N.R.: 1958,Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Huxley, T.H.: 1861, ‘On the Zoological Relations of Man with the Lower Animals’,Natural History Review 1, 67–84.Google Scholar
  11. Huxley, T.H.: 1863,Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature, London, Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
  12. Huxley, T.H.: 1870, “On Descartes' ‘Discourse Touching the Method of Using One's Reason Rightly and of Seeking Scientific Truth,’” reprinted inMethod and Results, New York, D. Appleton and Company, 1893.Google Scholar
  13. Huxley, T.H.: 1874, ‘On the Hypothesis that Animals are Automata, and its History’, reprinted inMethod and Results, New York, D. Appleton and Company, 1893.Google Scholar
  14. Kant, I.: 1987,Critique of Judgment, translated by W.S. Pluhar, Indianapolis, Hackett.Google Scholar
  15. Kingsley, C.: 1903,The Water-Babies, fourth edition, New York, The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  16. Owen, R.: 1835, ‘On the Osteology of the Chimpanzee and Orang Utan’,Transactions of the Zoological Society 1, 343–379.Google Scholar
  17. Owen, R.: 1848, ‘Osteological Contributions to the Natural History of the Chimpanzees (Troglodytes, Geoffroy), Including the Description of the Skull of a Large Species (Troglodytes Gorilla, Savage), Discovered by Thomas S. Savage, M.D., in the Gaboon Country, West Africa’,Transactions of the Zoological Society 3, 381–422.Google Scholar
  18. Owen, R.: 1851, ‘Osteological Contributions to the Natural History of the Chimpanzees (Troglodytes) and Orangs (Pithecus). No. IV. Description of the Cranium of an Adult Male Gorilla from the River Danger, West Coast of Africa, Indicative of the Variety of Great Chimpanzee (Troglodytes Gorilla), with Remarks on the Capacity of the Cranium and Other Characters Shown by Sections of the Skull, in the Orangs (Pithecus), Chimpanzees (Troglodytes), and in Different Varieties of the Human Race’,Transactions of the Zoological Society 4, 75–88.Google Scholar
  19. Owen, R.: 1857, ‘On the Characters, Principles of Division, and Primary Groups of the Class MAMMALIA’,Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society 2, 1–37.Google Scholar
  20. Owen, R.: 1859, ‘Contributions to the Natural History of the Anthropoid Apes. No. VIII. On the External Characters of the Gorilla’,Transactions of the Zoological Society 5, 243–283.Google Scholar
  21. Owen, R.: 1865,Memoir on the Gorilla, London, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  22. Owen, R.: 1868,Anatomy of Vertebrates, Volume 3, London, Longmans, Green, and Co.Google Scholar
  23. Owen, R.: 1992,The Hunterian Lectures in Comparative Anatomy May–June, 1837, edited and introduced by P.R. Sloan, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Putnam, H.: 1975, ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”, inMind, Language, and Reality, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Putnam, H.: 1981,Reason, Truth and History, New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Putnam, H.: 1990,Realism with a Human Face, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Quine, W.V.O.: 1963, ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, inFrom a Logical Point of View, New York, Harper & Row, Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Richards, E.: 1987, ‘A Question of Property Rights: Richard Owen's Evolutionism Reassessed’,British Journal of the History of Science 20, 129–171.Google Scholar
  29. Tiedemann, F.: 1836, ‘On the Brain of the Negro, Compared with that of the European and the Orang-Outan’,Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 497–527.Google Scholar
  30. Wittgenstein, L.: 1972,On Certainty, New York, Harper & Row, Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Wyman, J.: 1850, ‘A Description of Two Additional Crania of the Enge-ena (Troglodytes Gorilla, Savage) from Gaboon, Africa’,American Journal of Science and Arts, 2nd Series9, 34–45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Cosans
    • 1
  1. 1.Conceptual Foundations of ScienceThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations