Comparative reactivity of alkyl-substituted cyclopropane derivatives

  • I. E. Dolgii
  • A. P. Meshcheryakov
  • I. B. Shvedova
Brief Communications

Summary

  1. 1.

    The reactivity of trialkylsilylcyclopropanes when reacted with mercuric acetate obeys the same rules as apply to the reactivity of trialkylalkenylsilanes in ionic addition reactions, i.e., the trialkylsilylcyclopropanes, containing a silicon atom in the β-position to the cyclopropane ring, are much more reactive than are the trialkylsilylcyclopropanes that have the silicon atom in the α-position to the ring.

     
  2. 2.

    The stability of the three-membered ring is increased substantially by introducing a carbethoxy group into the molecule of the cyclopropane compound.

     
  3. 3.

    The length of heating has little effect on the activity of the cyclopropane compound when reacted with mercuric acetate.

     

Keywords

Acetate Silicon Cyclopropane Silicon Atom Addition Reaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    G. G. Gustavson, J. Prakt. Chem., [2],62, 290 (1900).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. S. Kharasch, M. Z. Fineman, and F. R. Mayo, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.,61, 2139.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Willstätter and J. Brace, Ber.,40, 4456 (1908).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. A. Kazanskii, M. Yu. Lukina, and V. A. Ovodova, Izv. AN SSSR, Otd. khim. nauk,1954, 878.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Yu. Lukina, S. V. Zotova, and B. A. Kazanskii, Izv. AN SSSR, Otd. khim. nauk,1958, 300; Dokl. AN SSSR,123, 105 (1958).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. D. Lawrence and C. F. H. Tipper, J. Chem. Soc.,1955, 713.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Hart and O. E. Curtis, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.,79, 931 (1957).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Yu. Lukina, Uspekhi khimii,31, 901 (1962).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Ya. Levina et al., Dokl. AN SSSR,71, 65 (1950); Zh. obshch. khim.,23, 1054 (1953); Dokl. AN SSSR,97, 1027 (1954); Zh. obshch. khim.,26, 2998 (1956); Vestn. Mosk. Univ., No. 2, 77 (1956); Zh. obshch. khim.,27, 881 (1957); Ibid.,29, 40 (1959); Ibid.,29, 1956 (1959); Ibid.,30, 359 (1960).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. A. Nesmeyanova, M. Yu. Lukina, and B. A. Kazanskii, Dokl. AN SSSR,153, 114 (1963).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    I. E. Dolgii, A. P. Meshcheryakov, and G. K. Gaivoronskaya, Izv. AN SSSR, Otd. khim. nauk,1963, 1111, 572.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. D. Petrov, V. F. Mironov, V. A. Ponomarenko, and E. A. Chernyshev, Synthesis of Organosilicon Monomers [in Russian], Izd. AN SSSR, Moscow (1961), p. 187.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. P. Meshcheryakov and I. E. Dolgii, Izv. AN SSSR, Otd. khim. anuk,1960, 1874, 931.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. E. Simmons and R. D. Smith, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.,81, 4256 (1959).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. T. Gragson, K. W. Greenlee, J. M. Derfer, and C. E. Boord, J. Org. Chem.,20, 275 (1955).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau Enterprises Inc. 1965

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. E. Dolgii
    • 1
  • A. P. Meshcheryakov
    • 1
  • I. B. Shvedova
    • 1
  1. 1.N. D. Zelinskii Institute of Organic ChemistryAcademy of Sciences of the USSRUSSR

Personalised recommendations