The widespread use of shock tubes in laboratory practice is well known. However, despite existing information  about shock-wave velocities of ∼ 100 km/sec, experimental data on the size of the shock-heated region behind the shock front are confined to the Mach numbers M = 10 . Theoretical data do not go beyond the limit of this range except for air where calculations were performed up to M = 20 [3, 4]. Behind strong shocks, the effects resulting from viscosity, thermal conductivity, and radiation of the medium should lead to serious deviation of the actual flow from the idealized pattern for uniform motion of a piston in a channel filled with anonviscous, thermally nonconducting, and nonradiating medium. It is therefore practical to make an experimental study of the behavior of density and of the size of the shock-heated region behind a shock front propagating down the channel of a shock tube that is capable of producing velocities up to 8 km/sec.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
A. E. Voitenko, “Production of high-velocity gas jets,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,158, No. 6, 1278 (1964).
T. V. Bazhenova, L. G. Gvozdeva, I. M. Naboko, R. G. Nemkov, Yu. S. Lobastov, and O. A. Predvoditeleva, Shock Waves in Real Gases [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1968).
H. Mirels, “Limitation on shock-tube test time because of a turbulent boundary layer at the wall,” AIAA J.,2, 84 (1964).
H. Mirels, “Test time for low-pressure shock tubes,” Phys. Fluids,6, No. 9, 1201 (1963).
A. A. Kon'kov, A. P. Ryazin, and A. I. Sokolov, “Two-diaphragm tube for the production of a dense thermal plasma,” Teplofiz. Vys. Temp.,12, No. 4, 806 (1974).
D. S. Rozhdestvenskii, Papers on Anomalous Dispersion in Metal Vapors [in Russian], Izd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1951).
S. G. Zaitsev, E. V. Lazareva, and E. I. Chebotareva, “Study of ionized argon behind a shock wave by an interference method,” Magnitn. Gidrodinam., No. 3, 86 (1967).
A. A. Kon'kov, A. P. Ryazin, and V. S. Rudnev, “Determination of temperature behind a reflected shock wave in air for Mach numbers 10–30,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer,7, No. 2, 339 (1967).
P. H. Rose and W. I. Stark, “Stagnation point heat-transfer measurements in dissociated air,” J. Aero. Sci.,25, No. 2, 86 (1958).
C. W. Allen, Astrophysical Quantities, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press (1963).
R. A. Alpher and D. R. White, “Optical interferometry,” in: Plasma Diagnostic Techniques (edited by R. H. Huddlestone and S. L. Leonard), Academic Press, (1965).
M. P. Bristow and L. L. Glass, “Polarizability of singly ionized argon,” Phys. Fluids,15, No. 11, 2066 (1972).
G. I. Kozlov and E. L. Stupitskii, “Calculation of argon state behind an incident shock wave in the range of Mach numbers 20–50 including excitation of multiple ionization and Coulomb interaction,” Zh. Prikl. Mekh. Tekh. Fiz., No. 3, 94 (1968).
E. Resler, S. C. Lin, and A. Kantrovits, “Production of high-temperature gases in shock tubes,” in: Shock Tubes [Russian translation], IL, Moscow (1962).
H. Mirels, “Flow nonuniformity in shock tubes operating at maximum test,” Phys. Fluids,9, No. 10, 1907 (1966).
V. G. Sevast'yanenko and I. T. Yakubov, “Radiation cooling of gas heat by a strong shock,” Opt. Spektrosk.,26, No. 1, 3 (1964).
M. McChesney and Z. Al-Attar, “Continuum radiation losses in shock-heated argon,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer,5, No. 4, 533 (1965).
Translated from Zhurnal Prikladnoi Mekhaniki i Tekhnicheskoi Fiziki, No. 4, pp. 23–28, July–August, 1976.
About this article
Cite this article
Kon'kov, A.A., Sokolov, A.I. Experimental study of strong shock propagation in a channel. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 17, 472–476 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00851995
- Mathematical Modeling
- Thermal Conductivity
- Experimental Study