Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 55–76 | Cite as

Is species selection dependent upon emergent characters?

  • Benton M. Stidd
  • David L. Wade


The architects of punctuated equilibrium and species selection as well as more recent workers (Vrba) have narrowed the original formulation of species selection and made it dependent upon so-called emergent characters. One criticism of this narrow version is the dearth of emergent characters with a consequent diminution in the robustness of species selection as an important evolutionary process. We argue that monomorphic species characters may at times be the focus of selection and that under these circumstances selection at the organism level is by-passed due to the absence of critical variance. Selection therefore shifts to the species level where variability reemerges in a clade. The absence of critical variance among organisms prevents effect macroevolution from operating. If species-wide properties are important in macroevolutionary processes, as we contend, systematists should pay more attention to their elucidation.

Key words

aggregate characters emergent characters monomorphic characters shifting selection species selection 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barnosky, D.: 1987, ‘Punctuated Equilibrium and Phyletic Gradualism’, in H.H. Genoways (ed.),Current Mammology 1, 109–147.Google Scholar
  2. Bock, W.J.: 1979, ‘The Synthetic Explanation of Macroevolutionary Change — A Reductionistic Approach.’Bulletin of Carnegie Museum of Natural History. No. 13, pp. 20–69.Google Scholar
  3. Bock, W.J.: 1986, ‘Species Concepts, Speciation, and Macroevolution’, in K. Iwatsuki, P.H. Raven and W.J. Bock (eds.),Modern Aspects of Species, University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp. 31–57.Google Scholar
  4. Brandon, R.N.: 1982, ‘The Levels of Selection’,Philosophy of Science Association 1, 315–322.Google Scholar
  5. Brothers, D.J.: 1985, ‘Species Concepts, Speciation, and Higher Taxa’, in E.S. Vrba (ed.),Species and Speciation, pp. 35–42. Transvaal Museum Monograph No. 4, Transvaal Museum, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  6. Carson, H.L.: 1975, ‘The Genetics of Speciation at the Diploid Level’,The American Naturalist 109, 83–92.Google Scholar
  7. Cracraft, J.: 1982, ‘A Non-equilibrium Theory for the Rate-control of Speciation and Extinction and the Origin of Macroevolutionary Patterns’,Systematic Zoology 31, 348–365.Google Scholar
  8. Cracraft, J.: 1985, ‘Species Selection, Macroevolutionary Analysis, and the “Hierarchical Theory” of Evolution’,Systematic Zoology 34, 222–229.Google Scholar
  9. Damuth, J. and I.L. Heisler: 1988, ‘Alternative Formulations of Multilevel Selection’,Biology and Philosophy 3, 407–430.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, J.I. and K.C. Nixon: 1992, ‘Populations, Genetic Variation, and the Delimination of Phylogenetic Species’,Systematic Biology 41, 421–435.Google Scholar
  11. Eldredge, N.: 1989,Macroevolutionary Dynamics, McGraw-Hill Publ. Co., New York.Google Scholar
  12. Eldredge, N. and S.J. Gould: 1972, ‘Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism’, in T.J.M. Schopf (ed.),Models in Paleobiology, Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  13. Fox, L.R. and P.A. Morrow: 1981, ‘Specialization: Species Property or Local Phenomenon?’,Science 211, 887–893.Google Scholar
  14. Gould, S.J.: 1982, ‘The Meaning of Punctuated Equilibrium and Its Role in Validating a Hierarchical Approach to Macroevolution’, in R. Milkman (ed.),Perspectives on Evolution, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  15. Gould, S.J. and N. Eldredge: 1977, ‘Punctuated Equilibria: The Tempo and Mode of Evolution Reconsidered’,Paleobiology 3, 115–151.Google Scholar
  16. Gross, A.: 1988, ‘Philosophy versus Science: The Species Debate and the Practice of Taxonomy’,Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 1, 223–230.Google Scholar
  17. Hansen, T.: 1978, ‘Larval Dispersal and Species Longevity in Lower Tertiary Gastropods’,Science 199, 885–887.Google Scholar
  18. Kaufmann, S.A.: 1985, ‘New Questions in Genetics and Evolution’,Cladistics 1, 247–265.Google Scholar
  19. Lloyd, E.A.: 1988,The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory, Praeger (Greenwood Press).Google Scholar
  20. Mayo, D.G. and N.L. Gilinsky: 1987, ‘Models of Group Selection’,Philosophy of Science 54, 515–538.Google Scholar
  21. Nixon, K.C. and Q.D. Wheeler: 1990, ‘An Amplification of the Phylogenetic Species Concept’,Cladistics 6, 211–223.Google Scholar
  22. Sober, E.: 1984,The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  23. Stanley, S.M.: 1975, ‘A Theory of Evolution Above the Species Level’,Proc. National Acad. Scie. USA 72, 646–650.Google Scholar
  24. Vrba, E.S.: 1980, ‘Evolution, Species and Fossils: How Does Life Evolve?’,South African Journal of Science 76, 61–84.Google Scholar
  25. Vrba, E.S.: 1983, ‘Macroevolutionary Trends: A New Perspective on the Roles of Adaptation and Incidental Effect’,Science 221, 387–389.Google Scholar
  26. Vrba, E.S.: 1984, ‘What is Species Selection?’,Systematic Zoology 33, 318–328.Google Scholar
  27. Vrba, E.S.: 1989, ‘Levels of Selection and Sorting with Special Reference to the Species Level’, in P.H. Harvey and L. Partridge (eds.),Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 6, 111–168.Google Scholar
  28. Vrba, E.S. and S.J. Gould: 1986, ‘The hierarchical expansion of sorting and selection: sorting and selection cannot be equated’,Paleobiology 12, 217–228.Google Scholar
  29. Vrba, E.S. and N. Eldredge: 1984, ‘Individuals, Hierarchies and Processes: Towards a More Complete Evolutionary Theory’,Paleobiology 10, 146–171.Google Scholar
  30. Wynne-Edwards, V.C.: 1962,Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behavior, Hafner, NY.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benton M. Stidd
    • 1
  • David L. Wade
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesWestern Illinois UniversityMacombU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations