Detecting faked penile responses to erotic stimuli
- 20 Downloads
Eighteen men were instructed to fake penile responses to discrete sexual stimuli presented auditorily or visually. The same stimuli were presented a second time following instruction on faking. Sexual responses were monitored using a penile plethysmograph (PPG). Further physiological response measures to detect faking attempts included the Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) and respiration (RESP). Faking attempts were found to be more successful to audio than visual stimuli, especially if the stimuli were relatively weaker. Arousal was much more difficult to fake than suppression. The more intense the efforts to fake, and especially following faking instructions, the more transparent the faking efforts. GSR and RESP added measurably to the detection of faked PPG responses which would have appeared otherwise to be genuine responses.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Farrall, W.R., & Card, R.D. (1988). Evaluation of assessment and treatment of the sexual aggressor. In R.A. Prentky & V.L. Quinsey (eds.).Human sexual aggression: Current perspectives, p.528, New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
- Freund, K. (1971). A note on the use of the phallometric methods of measuring mild sexual arousal in the male.Behavior Research & Therapy, 2, 223–228.Google Scholar
- Henson, D.E., & Rubin, H.B. (1971). Instructional control of eroticism.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 37–44.Google Scholar
- Quinsey, V.L. & Bergerson, S.G. (1976). Instructional control of penile circumference in assessments of sexual preference.Behavior Therapy, 7, 489–493.Google Scholar
- Quinsey, V.L. & Chaplin, T.C. (1987). Preventing faking in phallometric assessments of sexual arousal. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar