Advertisement

Applied Scientific Research

, Volume 52, Issue 1, pp 1–20 | Cite as

Boundary conditions for stokes flows near a porous membrane

  • Kek-Kiong Tio
  • Satwindar Singh Sadhal
Article

Abstract

A theoretical development is carried out to model the boundary conditions for Stokes flows near a porous membrane, which, in general, allows non-zero slip as well as normal flow at the surface. Two types of models are treated: an infinitesimally thin plate with a periodic array of circular apertures and a series of parallel slits. For Stokes flows, the mean normal flux and slip velocity are proportional to the pressure difference across the membrane and the average shear stress at the membrane, respectively. The appropriate proportionality constants which depend on the membrane geometry are calculated as functions of the porosity. An interesting feature of the results is that the slip at the membrane has, in general, a direction different from that of the applied shear for these models.

Key words

Stokes flow porous membrane 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beavers, G. S. and Joseph, D. D., Boundary conditions at a naturally permeable wall.J. Fluid Mech. 30 (1967) 197–207.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beavers, G. S., Sparrow, E. M. and Magnuson, R. A., Experiments on coupled parallel flows in a channel and bounding porous medium.J. Basic Engng. 92 (1970) 843–848.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dagan, Z., Weinbaum, S. and Pfeffer, R., An infinite-series solution for the creeping motion through an orifice of finite length.J. Fluid Mech. 115 (1982) 505–523.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dagan, Z., Weinbaum, S. and Pfeffer, R., Theory and experiment on the three-dimensional motion of a freely suspended spherical particle at the entrance to a pore at low Reynolds number.Chem. Engng. Sci. 38 (1983) 583–596.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davis, A. M. J., O'Neill, M. E. and Brenner, H., Axisymmetric Stokes flows due to a rotlet or stokeslet near a hole in a plane wall: filtration flows.J. Fluid Mech. 103 (1981) 183–205.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis, A. M. J., Force and torque formulae for a sphere moving in an axisymmeric Stokes flow with finite boundaries: asymmetric stokeslet near a hole in a plane wall.Int. J. Multiphase Flow 9 (1983) 575–608.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fung, Y. C.,Foundations of Solid Mechanics. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall (1965).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goren, S. L., The hydrodynamic force resisting the approach of a sphere to a plane permeable wall.J. Colloid Interface Sci. 69 (1979) 78–85.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gradshteyn, I. S. and Ryzhik, I. M.,Table of Integrals, Series, and Products. New York: Academic Press (1980).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gupta, S. C., Slow broad side motion of a flat plate in a viscous liquid.J. Appl. Math. Phys. (ZAMP) 8 (1957) 257–261.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Happel, J. and Brenner, H.,Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff (1986).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ingham, D. B., Tang, T. and Morton, B. R., Steady two-dimensional flow through a row of normal flat plates.J. Fluid Mech. 210 (1990) 281–302.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johansen, F. C., Flow through pipe orifices at low Reynolds numbers.Proc. Roy. Soc. London A125 (1930) 231–245.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jones, I. P., Low Reynolds number flow past a porous spherical shell.Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 73 (1973) 231–238.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lebedev, N. N.,Special Functions and their Applications. New York: Dover Publications (1972).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miyazaki, T. and Hasimoto, H., Stokeslet perpendicular to a plane wall with a circular hole.J. Phys. Soc. Japan 51 (1982) 2343–2349.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miyazaki, T. and Hasimoto, H., The motion of a small sphere in fluid near a circular hole in a plane wall.J. Fluid Mech. 145 (1984) 201–221.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nir, A., On the departure of a sphere from contact with a permeable membrane.J. Engng. Math. 15 (1981) 65–75.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    O'Neill, M. E. and Bhatt, B. S., Slow motion of a solid sphere in the presence of a naturally permeable surface.Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 44 (1991) 91–104.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Richardson, S., A model for the boundary condition of a porous material, part 2.J. Fluid Mech. 49 (1971) 327–336.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roscoe, R., The flow of viscous fluids round plane obstacles.Phil. Mag. 40 (1949) 338–351.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saffman, P. G., On the boundary condition at the surface of a porous medium.Studies Appl. Math. 50 (1971) 93–101.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sampson, R. A., On Stoke's current function.Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A182 (1891) 449–518.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shail, R. and Warrilow, I. M., The sedimentation of a small particle through a fluid-filled pore of finite length.J. Engng. Math. 22 (1988) 355–382.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smith, S. H., Stokes flow past slits and holes.Int. J. Multiphase Flow 13 (1987) 219–231.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sneddon, I. N.,Mixed Boundary Value Problems in Potential Theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company (1966).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Taylor, G. I., A model for the boundary condition of a porous material, part 1.J. Fluid Mech. 49 (1971) 319–326.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tio, K. -K. and Sadhal, S. S., Analysis of thermal constriction resistance with adiabatic circular gaps.J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer 5 (1991) 550–559.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kek-Kiong Tio
    • 1
  • Satwindar Singh Sadhal
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Applied Mechanics and Engineering SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego, La JollaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations