Migratory and organogenetic capacities of muscle cells in bird embryos

  • Annick Mauger
  • Madeleine Kieny
Article

Summary

The migratory and organogenetic capacities of muscle cells at different stages of differentiation were tested in heterospecific chick/quail recombinants. Grafts containing muscle cells were taken from the premuscular masses from 4- to 5-day quail embryos, from the limb or trunk muscles of 12-day embryonic and 4-day post-natal quails, and from experimentally produced bispecific premuscular masses in which the myoblasts are of quail origin and the connective tissue cells of chick origin. Grafts were implanted into 2-day chick embryos in place of the somitic mesoderm at the limb level. Hosts were examined 4 to 7 days after operation.

After implantation of a piece of premuscular mass, quail cells were found at and around the site of the graft in the truncal region and within the limb as far as the autopod. Quail cells participated predominantly in the trunk and limb musculature, which contained a number of quail myotubes and of bispecific quail/chick myotubes. Apart from skeletal muscles, quail cells contributed sporadically to nerve envelopes and blood vessel walls in the limb.

When the graft was of bispecific constitution, quail nuclei in the limb and the trunk were found exclusively in monospecific and bispecific myotubes.

After implantation of differentiated embryonic or post-natal muscle tissue, quail cells in the limb contributed only sporadically to nerve envelopes and blood vessel walls, while in the trunk they also participated in the formation of muscles and tendons.

It is concluded that the myogenic cells in 4 to 5-day quail premuscular masses are still able to undergo an extensive migration into the limb buds and there participate in the formation of myotubes and anatomically normal muscles. They display developmental potentialities equivalent to those of the somitic myogenic stem cells. These capacities are lost in 12-day embryonic muscles.

Key words

Chick and quail embryos Limb bud Cell migration Myogenic cells 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chevallier A (1978a) Etude de la migration des cellules somitiques dans le mésoderme somatopleural de l'ébauche de l'aile. Wilhelm Roux's Archives 184:57–73Google Scholar
  2. Chevallier A (1978b) Contribution à l'étude des potentialités morphogénétiques du mésoderme somitique et du mésoderme somatopleural chez l'embryon d'oiseau. Thèse Doctorat ès Sciences (Sciences Naturelles), GrenobleGoogle Scholar
  3. Chevallier A, Kieny M, Mauger A (1976) Sur l'origine de la musculature de l'aile chez les oiseaux. C R Acad Sci Sér D: 282:309–311Google Scholar
  4. Chevallier A, Kieny M, Mauger A (1977) Limb-somite relationship: origin of the limb musculature. J Embryol Exp Morphol 41:245–258PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chevallier A, Kieny M, Mauger A (1978) Limb-somite relationship: effect of removal of somitic mesoderm on the wing musculature. J Embryol Exp Morphol 43:263–278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Christ B, Jacob HJ, Jacob M (1974) Über den Ursprung der Flügelmuskulatur. Experimentelle Untersuchungen mit Wachtel- und Hühnerembryonen. Experientia 30:1446–1449PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Christ B, Jacob HJ, Jacob M (1977) Experimental analysis of the origin of the wing musculature in avian embryos. Anat Embryol 150:171–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Feulgen R, Rossenbeck H (1924) Mikroskopisch-chemischer Nachweis einer Nucleinsaure vom Typus der Thymonucleinsaure und die darauf beruhende elektive Färbung von Zellkernen in mikroskopischen Präparaten. Hoppe-Seyler's Z Physiol Chem 135:203–252Google Scholar
  9. Hilfer SR, Searls RL, Fonte VG (1973) An ultrastructural study of early myogenesis in the chick wing bud. Dev Biol 30:374–391PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Holtzer H, Rubinstein N, Fellini S, Yeoh G, Chi J, Birnbaum J, Okayama M (1975) Lineages, quantal cell cycles, and the generation of cell diversity. Q Rev Biophys 8:523–557PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacob M, Christ B, Jacob HJ (1972) On the migration of myogenic stem cells into the prospective wing region of chick embryos. A scanning and transmission electron microscope study. Anat Embryol 153:179–193Google Scholar
  12. Jacob M, Christ B, Jacob HJ (1979) The migration of myogenic cells from the somites into the leg region of avian embryos. An ultrastructural study. Anat Embryol 157:291–309PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kieny M, Chevallier A (1980) Existe-t-il une relation spatiale entre le niveau d'origine des cellules somitiques myogènes et leur localisation terminale dans l'aile? Arch Anat Microsc Morphol Exp 69:35–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kieny M, Mauger A, Chevallier A, Sengel P (1979) Origine embryologique des muscles lisses cutanés chez les Oiseaux. Arch Anat Microsc Morphol Exp 68:283–290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL (1951) A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol 88:49–92Google Scholar
  16. Le Douarin N, Barq G (1969) Sur l'utilisation des cellules de caille japonaise comme “marqueurs biologiques” en embryologie expérimentale. C R Acad Sci Sér D:269:1543–1546Google Scholar
  17. Mauro A (1979)Muscle regeneration. Raven Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Waldeyer W (1865) Über die Veränderung der quergestreiften Muskeln bei der Entzündung und dem Typhusprozeß, sowie über die Regeneration derselben nach Substanzdefecten. Arch Pathol Anat Phys Klin Med 34:473–514Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annick Mauger
    • 1
  • Madeleine Kieny
    • 1
  1. 1.Equipe de recherche associée au CNRS no 621 “Morphogenèse expérimentale”, Laboratoire de Zoologie et Biologie animaleUniversité scientifique et médicale de GrenobleGrenoble CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations