Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Differential responses to ultraviolet irradiation of the polar cytoplasm ofDrosophila eggs: II. Response to dose

  • 18 Accesses

  • 2 Citations

Summary

The posterior pole cytoplasm of early embryos ofDrosophila melanogaster was irradiated with increasing doses of U.V. light at a wave length specific for nucleic acids 35 and 75 min after ovoposition, when nuclei were still inside the yolk mass. Probit analysis showed that:

Sterility was higher in irradiations performed at 35 min.

Mortality was higher in the experiment performed at 75 min.

After treatment at 35 min, sterility and mortality were independent phenomena.

The numbers of targets involved in germ cell determination were of the order of tens and hundreds at 35 and 75 min respectively.

The numbers of targets involved in viability were of several orders of magnitude in both developmental stages.

The irradiation, even at very low doses, caused a background effect which was probably due to “old” embryos. The sex ratio was distorted in favour of females at high doses and of males at low doses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aboïm, A. N.: Dévelopement embryonnaire et post-embryonnaire des gonades normales et agamétiques deDrosophila melanogaster. Rev. Suisse Zool.52, 53–154 (1945)

  2. Anderson, D. T.: The comparative embryology of the Diptera. Ann. Rev. Entomology11, 23–46 (1966)

  3. Armitage, P.: Tests for linear trends in proportions and frequencies. Biometrics11, 375–386 (1955)

  4. Audit, C., Gans, M., Masson, M.: Isolation and characterisation of sex linked female sterility mutants inDrosophila melanogaster. (Submitted for publication 1975)

  5. Bownes, M., Kalthoff, K.: Embryonic defects inDrosophila eggs after partial U.V. irradiation at different wavelengths. J. Embryol. exp. Morph.31, 329–345 (1974)

  6. Chan, L. N., Gehgring, W.: Determination of blastoderm cells inDrosophila melanogaster J. Exp. Zool.161, 221–242 (1971)

  7. Colaianne, J. J., Bell, A. E.: Sonless, a sex-ratio anomaly inDrosophila melanogaster resulting from a gene-cytoplasm interaction. Genetics65, 619–625 (1970)

  8. Dertinger, H., Jung, H.: Molecular radiation biology. Heidelberg Sci. Libr. Vol. 12, London 1970

  9. Fisher, R. A., Yates, F.: Statistical tables for biological, agricultural and medical research. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd Ltd. 1963

  10. Geigy, R.: Action de l'ultra-violet sur le pole germinal dans l'oeuf deDrosophila melanogaster (castration et mutabilite). Rev. Suisse Zool.38, 187–288 (1931)

  11. Ghelelovitch, S.: La sensibilité des oeufs de la Drosophile (Drosophila melanogaster, Meig.) à l'action létale des rayons ultra-violets. I. Evolution de la sensibilité avec l'age de l'embryon. Int. J. Rad. Biol.11, 225–271 (1966)

  12. Graziosi, G., Micali, F.: Differential responses to ultraviolet irradiation of the polar cytoplasm ofDrosophila egg. Wilhelm Roux' Arch.175, 1–11 (1974)

  13. Graziosi, G., Roberts, D. B.: Molecular anisotrophy of earlyDrosophila embryo. Nature258, 157–159 (1975)

  14. Hathaway, D. S., Selman, G. G.: Certain aspects of cell lineage and morphogenes studied in embryos ofDrosophila melanogaster with an ultraviolet micro-beam. J. Embryol. exp. Morph.9, 310–325 (1961)

  15. Herth, W., Sander, K.: Mode and timing of body pattern formation (regionalisation) in the early embryonic development of Cyclorrhaphic Dipterans (Protophormia, Drosophila). Wilhelm Roux' Archiv172, 1–27 (1973)

  16. Huettner, R. W.: The origin of germ cells inDrosophila melanogaster. J. Morph.37, 385–423 (1923)

  17. Illmensee, K., Mahowald, A. P.: Transplantation of posterior polar plasm inDrosophila. Induction of germ cells at the anterior pole of the egg. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)71, 1016–1020 (1974)

  18. Illmensee, K., Mahowald, A. P.: The autonomous function of germ plasm in somatic region of theDrosophila egg. Exp. Cell Res. (in press)

  19. Jura, Cz.: Cytological and experimental observations on the origin and fate of the pole cells inDrosophila virilis Sturt. Part II. Experimental analysis. Acta Biol. Crac. Zool.7, 89–103 (1964)

  20. Kalthoff, K.: Position of targets and period of competence for UV-induction of the malformation “Double Abdomen” in the egg ofSmittia spec. (Diptera, Chironomidae). Wilhelm Roux' Arch.168, 63–84 (1971)

  21. Levin, V. L.: Chans in the UV sensitivity in the embryo-genesis ofDrosophila. Tsitologiya13, 212–220 (1971)

  22. Lison, L.: Statistica applicata alla biologia sperimental. Milano, Casa Editrice Ambrosiana 1961

  23. Mahowald, A. P.: Polar granules ofDrosophila. IV. Cytochemical studies showing loss of RNA from polar granules during early stages of embryogenesis. J. Exp. Zool.176, 345–352 (1971)

  24. Moreno, F.: Contribution a l'étude de la létalité et de la stérilité induites chezDrosophila melanogaster par irradiation U.V. des cellules polaires de l'oeuf. II. Action sterilisante. Int. J. Radiat. Biol.16, 451–465 (1969)

  25. Poulson, D. F.: Histogenesis, organogenesis and differentiation in the embryo ofDrosophila melanogaster Meigen. In: “The Biology of Drosophila”. Ch. 3. M. Demerec (ed). New York: John Wiley and Sons 1950

  26. Poulson, D. F., Waterhouse, D. F.: Experimental studies on pole cells and midgut differentiation in Diptera. Aust. J. biol. Sci.13, 541–567 (1960)

  27. Prudhommeau, C., Lauge, G.: Irradiation UV des cellules polaires de l'oeuf chezDrosophila melanogaster. II. Estimation du nombre des cellules polaires à l'origine de la lignée germinale. Mutation Res.14, 43–52 (1972)

  28. Okada M., Kleinman, F. A., Schneiderman, H. A.: Restoration of fertility in sterilisedDrosophila eggs by transplantation of polar cytoplasm. Develop. Biol.37, 43–54 (1974)

  29. Snedecor, G. W., Cochran, W. G.: Statistical methods. Sixth ed. Ames, The Iowa State College Press 1976

  30. Warn, R.: Restoration of fertility in UV irradiatedDrosophila embryos by injection of posterior pole plasm. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. (in press).

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graziosi, G., Marzari, R. Differential responses to ultraviolet irradiation of the polar cytoplasm ofDrosophila eggs: II. Response to dose. Wilhelm Roux' Archiv 179, 291–300 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00848238

Download citation

Keywords

  • Nucleic Acid
  • Developmental Stage
  • Germ Cell
  • Developmental Biology
  • Wave Length