Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 37–59 | Cite as

Are social-psychological smoking prevention programs effective? The waterloo study

  • Brian R. Flay
  • Katherine B. Ryan
  • J. Allan Best
  • K. Stephen Brown
  • Mary W. Kersell
  • Josie R. d'Avernas
  • Mark P. Zanna
Article

Abstract

Recent evaluations of smoking prevention programs have suggested considerable promise for curricula emphasizing resistance of social influences. The present study extends these evaluations by addressing key methodological limitations in previous work. Twenty-two matched schools were randomized to experimental and control conditions. Grade 6 students received a 6-week core curriculum, plus additional sessions through Grades 7 and 8. Questionnaires, and saliva samples to validate self-reported smoking behavior, were collected at five times over the 2-year study period. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses examined program impact for five levels of initial smoking experience, ranging from “never smoker” through regular, weekly smoker. Significant program effects were documented, most clearly for those having some experience with smoking before the program began and for those with smoking peer and family models. This study provides the methodologically most rigorous test to date of social influence programs for smoking prevention and documents for the first time significant effects for those at high risk for smoking.

Key words

adolescent smoking smoking prevention social inoculation social influences health promotion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arkin, R. M., Roemhild, H. F., Johnson, C. A., Luepker, R. V., and Murray, D. M. (1981). The Minnesota smoking prevention program: A seventh grade health curriculum supplement.J. School Health, 51(19): 611–616.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1977).Social Learning Theory, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
  3. Best, J. A., Flay, B. R., Towson, S. M. J., Ryan, K. B., Perry, C. L., Brown, K. S., Kersell, M. W., and d'Avernas, J. R. (1985). Smoking prevention and the concept of risk.J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. (in press).Google Scholar
  4. Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., and Holland, P. W. (1975).Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  5. Botvin, G., and Eng, A. (1980). A comprehensive school-based smoking prevention program.J. School Health 11: 209–213.Google Scholar
  6. Botvin, G., and Eng, A. (1981). Life skill training and smoking prevention: A one year follow up. Presented at American Public Health Association meeting, Los Angeles, November.Google Scholar
  7. Botvin, G., and Eng, A. (1982). The efficacy of a multicomponent approach to the prevention of cigarette smoking.Prevent. Med. 11: 199–211.Google Scholar
  8. Botvin, G., Eng, A., and Williams, C. L. (1980). Preventing the onset of cigarette smoking through life skills training.Prevent. Med. 9: 135–143.Google Scholar
  9. Botvin, G., and Wills, T. A. (1985). Personal and social skills training: Cognitive-behavioral approaches to substance abuse prevention. In Bell, C., and Battjes, R. (eds.),Prevention research: Deterring drug abuse among children and adolescents. NIDA Research Monograph, Washington, D.C. (in press).Google Scholar
  10. Brown, K. S., Cherry, W. H., and Forbes, W. F. (1980). The smoking habits of Canadian school children.Proceedings of Conference on Student Smoking, Calgary, Alberta, October, 1978, Canadian Council on Smoking and Health.Google Scholar
  11. Burstein, L. (1980a). The role of levels of analysis in the specification of education effects. In Dreeben, R., and Thomas, J. A. (eds.),The Analysis of Educational Productivity, Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  12. Burstein, L. (1980b). The analysis of multilevel data in educational research and evaluation.Rev. Res. Educ. 8: 158–233.Google Scholar
  13. Cox, D. R. (1970).The Analysis of Binary Data, Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  14. Evans, R. I. (1976). Smoking in children: Developing a social psychological strategy of deterrence.J. Prevent. Med. 5: 122–127.Google Scholar
  15. Evans, R. I., Hansen, W. B., and Mittlemark, M. B. (1977). Increasing the validity of selfreports of behavior in a smoking in children investigation.J. Appl. Psychol. 62: 521–523.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Evans, R. I., Rozelle, R. M., Mittlemark, M. B., Hansen, W. B., Bane, A. I., and Havis, J. (1978). Deterring the onset of smoking in children: Knowledge of immediate physiological effects and coping with peer pressure, media pressure and parent modelling.J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 8: 126–135.Google Scholar
  17. Evans, R. I., Rozelle, R. M., Maxwell, S. E., Raines, B. E., Dill, C. A., Guthrie, T. J., Henderson, A. H., and Hill, P. C. (1981). Social modelling films to deter smoking in adolescents: Results of a three year field investigation.J. Appl. Psychol. 66(4): 399–414.Google Scholar
  18. Finney, D. J. (1971).Probit Analysis, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  19. Fisher, E. B. (1980). Progress in reducing smoking behavior.Am. J. Publ. Health 70: 678–679.Google Scholar
  20. Flay, B. R. (1985) What do we know about the social influences approach to smoking prevention? Review and recommendations. In Bell, C., and Battjes, R. (eds.),Prevention research: Deterring drug abuse among children and adolescents, NIDA Research Monograph, Washington, D.C. (in press).Google Scholar
  21. Flay, B. R., and Best, J. A. (1982). Overcoming design problems in the evaluation of health behavior change programs.Eval. health Prof. 5: 43–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Flay, B. R., and Cook, T. D. (1981). The evaluation of media-based prevention campaigns. In Rice, R. R., and Paisley, W. (eds.),Public Communication Campaigns, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.Google Scholar
  23. Flay, B. R., d'Avernas, J. R., Best, J. A., Kersell, M. W., and Ryan, K. B. (1983a). Cigarette smoking: Why young people do it and ways of preventing it. In McGrath, P. J., and Firestone, P. (eds.),Pediatric and Adolescent Behavioral Medicine, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Flay, B. R., Hansen, W. B., Johnson, C. A., and Sobel, J. L. (1983b). Involvement of children in motivating parents to quit smoking with a television program. Presented at meetings of American Psychological Association, Anaheim, Calif.Google Scholar
  25. Flay, B. R., Johnson, C. A., Hansen, W. B., Grossman, L. M., Sobel, J. L., and Collins, L. M. (1983c). Evaluation of a school-based, family-oriented, television-enhanced smoking prevention and cessation programs: The importance of implementation evaluation. Presented at Joint Meetings of the Evaluation Network and the Evaluation Research Society, Chicago, October.Google Scholar
  26. Flay, B. R., Johnson, C. A., Hansen, W. B., Ulene, A., Grossman, L. M., Alvarez, L., Sobol, D. F., Hochstein, G., and Sobel, J. L. (1982). Evaluation of a mass media enhanced smoking prevention and cessation program. In Baggaley, J. P., and Janega, P. (eds.),Experimental Research in Televised Instruction, Vol. 5, Concordia University, Montreal.Google Scholar
  27. Hansen, W. B., Collins, L. M., Malotte, C. K., Johnson, C. A., and Fielding, J. E. (1985). Attrition in prevention research.J. Behav. Med. (in press).Google Scholar
  28. Hunter, S. MacD., Baugh, J. G., Weber, L. S., Sklov, M. C., and Berenson, G. S. (1982). Social learning effects in trial and adoption of cigarette smoking in children: The Bogalusa Heart Study.Prevent. Med. 11: 29–42.Google Scholar
  29. Hurd, P. D., Johnson, C. A., Pechacek, T., Jacobs, D. R., and Luepker, R. V. (1980). Prevention of cigarette smoking in seventh grade students.J. Behav. Med. 3: 15–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Janis, I. L., and Mann, L. (1977).Decision-Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice and Commitment, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, C. A., Hansen, W. B., Collins, L. M., and Graham, J. W. (1984). Final Report. The High School Anit-Smoking Project. Final report to National Institute on Drug Abuse, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  32. Jones, E. E., and Sigall, H. (1971). The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude.Psychol. Bull. 76: 349–364.Google Scholar
  33. Jones, E. E., Kanouse, D. E., Kelley, H. H., Nisbett, R. E., Valins, S., and Weiner, B. (1972).Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior, General Learning Press, Morristown, N.J.Google Scholar
  34. Kiesler, C. A. (1971).The Psychology of Commitment, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Leventhal, H., and Cleary, P. D., (1980). The smoking problem: A review of the research and theory in behavioral risk modification.Psychol. Bull. 88: 370–405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Luepker, R. V., Pechacek, T. I., Murray, D. M., Johnson, C. A., Hurd, P., and Jacobs, D. R. (1981). Saliva thiocyanate: A chemical indicator of smoking in adolescents.Am. J. Publ. Health 71: 1320–1324.Google Scholar
  37. Luepker, R. V., Johnson, C. A., Murray, D. M., and Pechacek, T. F. (1983). Prevention of cigarette smoking: Three year follow-up of an education program for youth.J. Behav. Med. 6: 53–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. McAlister, A., Perry, C., and Maccoby, N. (1979). Adolescent smoking: Onset and prevention.Pediatrics 63: 650–658.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. McAlister, A., Perry C., Killen, J., Slinkard, L., and Maccoby, N. (1980). Pilot study of smoking, alcohol, and drug abuse prevention.Am. J. Publ. Health 70: 719–721.Google Scholar
  40. McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 1), Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  41. McGuire, W. J. (1968). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In Lindzay, G., Aronson, E. (eds.).Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 3, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.Google Scholar
  42. Murray, D. M., Johnson, C. A., Luepker, R. V., Pechacek, T. F., and Jacobs, D. R. (1980). Issues in smoking prevention research. Presented at American Psychological Association, Montreal, September.Google Scholar
  43. Pederson, L. L., Baskerville, J. C., and Lefcoe, N. M. (1981). Multivariate prediction of cigarette smoking among children in grades six, seven, and eight.J. Drug Educ. 11: 191–203.Google Scholar
  44. Perry, C. L., Killen, J., and Slinkard, L. A. (1980a). Peer teaching and smoking prevention among junior high students.Adolescence 15: 277–281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Perry, C. L., Killen, J., Telch, M. J., Slinkard, L. A., and Danaher, B. S. (1980b). Modifying smoking behavior of teenagers: A school-based intervention.Am. J. Publ. Health, 70: 722–725.Google Scholar
  46. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychol. Monogr. 80(1): Whole No. 609.Google Scholar
  47. Telch, M. J., Killen, J. D., McAlister, A. L., Perry, C. L., and Maccoby, N. (1982). Longterm follow-up of a pilot project on smoking prevention with adolescents.J. Behav. Med. 5: 1–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Williams, C. L., Eng, A., Botvin, G. C., Hill, P., and Wynder, E. L. (1979). Validation of student's self-reported cigarette smoking status with plasma cotinine levels.Am. J. Publ. Health 69: 1272–1276.Google Scholar
  49. Williams, D. A. (1982). Extra-binominal variationin logistic linear models.Appl. Stat. 31: 144–148.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian R. Flay
    • 1
  • Katherine B. Ryan
    • 2
  • J. Allan Best
    • 2
  • K. Stephen Brown
    • 2
  • Mary W. Kersell
    • 2
  • Josie R. d'Avernas
    • 2
  • Mark P. Zanna
    • 3
  1. 1.Health Behavior Research InstituteUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles
  2. 2.Health Studies DepartmentUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  3. 3.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations