Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 353–360 | Cite as

Understanding the effects of fear-arousing communications: The role of cognitive factors and amount of fear aroused

  • Stephen Sutton
  • Robert Hallett


This paper reports an experimental study investigating the role of cognitive factors and fear in mediating the effects of “fear-arousing” health threat communications. Seventy-seven cigarette smokers were shown either a videotape about smoking or a control videotape on a different health topic before completing a questionnaire assessing their intentions to try to quit, the level of fear aroused, and three cognitive factors: (a) probability difference (perceived reduction in risk of health damage that follows from successful cessation), (b) utility of health damage, and (c) confidence. The smoking videotape influenced probability difference, utility, intentions, and follow-up reports of attempts at cessation. As predicted, both probability difference and utility influenced intention, which in turn influenced behavior. Neither confidence nor the amount of fear aroused by the videotape had significant effects on intention.

Key words

fear communication smoking intentions 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1980).Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
  2. Edwards, W. (1961). Behavioral decision theory.Annu. Rev. Psychol. 12: 473–498.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Eiser, J. R., van der Pligt, J., Raw, M., and Sutton, S. R. (1985). Trying to stop smoking: Effects of perceived addiction, attributions for failure, and expectancy of success.J. Behav. Med. 8: 321–341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hallett, R., and Sutton, S. R. (1986). Factors influencing the decision to attempt to stop smoking in a media-based smoking intervention programme.Health Educ. Res. 1: 163–173.Google Scholar
  5. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., and Kelley, H. H. (1953).Communication and Persuasion, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.Google Scholar
  6. Janis, I. L. (1967). Effects of fear arousal on attitude change: Recent developments in theory and research. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 3, pp. 166–224.Google Scholar
  7. Kenny, D. A. (1979).Correlation and Causality, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Leventhal, H. (1970). Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 5, pp. 119–186.Google Scholar
  9. McGuire, W. J. (1968). Personality and susceptibility to social influence. In Borgatta, E., and Lambert, W. (eds.),Handbook of Personality Theory and Research, Rand McNally, Chicago, pp. 1130–1188.Google Scholar
  10. Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change.J. Psychol. 91: 93–114.Google Scholar
  11. Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., and Shapiro, D. (eds.),Social Psychophysiology: A Sourcebook, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 153–176.Google Scholar
  12. Rogers, R. W. (1985). Attitude change and information integration in fear appeals.Psychol. Rep. 56: 179–182.Google Scholar
  13. Rogers, R. W., and Mewborn, C. R. (1976). Fear appeals and attitude change: Effects of a threat's noxiousness, probability of occurrence, and the efficacy of coping responses.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 34: 54–61.Google Scholar
  14. Sutton, S. R. (1979). Can subjective expected utility (SEU) theory explain smokers' decisions to try to stop smoking? In Oborne, D. J., Gruneberg, M. M., and Eiser, J. R. (eds.),Research in Psychology and Medicine, Academic Press, London, Vol. 2, pp. 94–101.Google Scholar
  15. Sutton, S. R. (1982). Fear-arousing communications: A critical examination of theory and research. In Eiser, J. R. (ed.),Social Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 303–337.Google Scholar
  16. Sutton, S. R., and Eiser, J. R. (1984). The effect of fear-arousing communications on cigarette smoking: An expectancy-value approach.J. Behav. Med. 7: 13–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sutton, S. R., Marsh, A., and Matheson, J. (1987). Explaining smokers' decisions to stop: Test of an expectancy-value approach.Soc. Behav. 2: 35–49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Sutton
    • 1
  • Robert Hallett
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PsychiatryUniversity of LondonLondonEngland

Personalised recommendations