Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 11, Issue 5, pp 459–472 | Cite as

A comparison of the Fishbein and Ajzen and the Triandis attitudinal models for the prediction of exercise intention and behavior

  • Pierre Valois
  • Raymond Desharnais
  • Gaston Godin
Article

Abstract

The main purpose of the study was to compare the efficiency of the Fishbein and Ajzen and the Triandis models to predict (1) the intention to participate regularly in some physical activities during free time within a 3-week period and (2) the exercise behavior within these 3 weeks among a group of 166 subjects, aged 22 to 65 years. Our results show that the Triandis model was as efficient as the Fishbein and Ajzen model in predicting the exercise behavior. However, the results obtained from the Triandis model demonstrate the importance of the habit of exercising in predicting the exercise behavior. Moreover, the Triandis model was superior to the Fishbein and Ajzen model in explaining behavioral intention. Of particular interest was the salience of the affective, social, and personal belief components of the Triandis model. In addition, from a practical perspective, this comparative study showed that (1) to exercise regularly is perceived as hard work, and (2) individuals believe that it is their own responsibility to exercise or not to exercise.

Key words

attitude exercise habit intention theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1980).Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I., and Timko, C. (1986). Correspondence between health attitudes and behavior.Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 7: 259–276.Google Scholar
  3. Cooper, J., and Croyle, R. T. (1984). Attitudes and attitude change.Annu. Revi. Psychol. 35: 395–426.Google Scholar
  4. Fazio, R. H., and Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 14, Academic Press, New York, pp. 161–202.Google Scholar
  5. Fishbein, M. (1976). Extending the extended model: Some comments.Adv. Consumer Res. 3: 491–497.Google Scholar
  6. Fishcein, M. (1983). Factors influencing health behaviors: An analysis based on the theory of reasoned action. In Landry, F. (ed.),La mesure et l'atténuation des facteurs de risque et de la promotion de la santé: Les 18 e Assises annuelles de la Sociéte de Medecine Prospective, Association Canadienne d'Hygiène Publique, Ottowa, pp. 205–214.Google Scholar
  7. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975).Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.Google Scholar
  8. Godin, G. (1987). Importance of the emotional aspect of attitude to predict intention.Psychol. Rep. 61: 719–723.Google Scholar
  9. Godin, G., and Shephard, R. J. (1986). Importance of type of attitude to the study of exercise-behavior.Psychol. Rep. 58: 991–1000.Google Scholar
  10. Godin, G., Shephard, R. J., and Colantonio, A. (1986). The cognitive profile of those who intend to exercise but do not.Public Health Rep. 101: 521–526.Google Scholar
  11. Godin, G., Valois, P., Shephard, R. J., and Desharnais, R. (1987). Prediction of leisure-time exercise behavior: A path analysis (LISREL V) model.J. Behav. Med. 10: 145–158.Google Scholar
  12. Haskell, W. L. (1985). Physical activity and health: Need to define the required stimulus.Am. J. Cardiol. 55: 4D-9D.Google Scholar
  13. Kannell, W. B., and Blair, S. N. (1985). Epidemiological assessment of the role of physical activity and fitness in the development of cardiovascular disease.Am. Heart J. 109: 876–885.Google Scholar
  14. Miniard, P. W., and Cohen, J. B. (1981). An examination of the Fishbein-Ajzen behavioral-intention model's concepts and measures.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 17: 309–339.Google Scholar
  15. Riddle, P. K. (1980). Attitudes, belief, behavioral intentions, and behaviors of women and men toward regular exercise.Res. Q. Exercise Sport 51: 663–674.Google Scholar
  16. Wankel, L. M. (1985). Personal and situational factors affecting exercise involvement: The importance of enjoyment.Res. Q. Exercise Sport 56: 275–282.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre Valois
    • 1
  • Raymond Desharnais
    • 2
  • Gaston Godin
    • 3
  1. 1.Département de Mesure et EvaluationUniversité LavalSte-FoyCanada
  2. 2.Département d'Education PhysiqueUniversité LavalSte-FoyCanada
  3. 3.Ecole des Sciences InfirmiŕesUniversité LavalSte-FoyCanada

Personalised recommendations