Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 38, Issue 1–3, pp 117–125

Predation on elasmobranch eggs

  • David L. Cox
  • Thomas J. Koob
Article

Synopsis

Predation on large, energy rich eggs is common in terrestrial and freshwater communities with the eggs of amphibians, reptiles and birds figuring as prominant prey. We might predict that predation on large eggs would also be widespread in marine communities. However, little information is available to test this prediction. We present new evidence for such predation on elasmobranch eggs based on examination of capsules held in museum collections, those collected from beaches, long-term incubations of caged egg capsules, and SCUBA observation. The principal egg predators appear to be gastropods, though vertebrates contribute to mortality of embryonic elasmobranchs. As yet we can only speculate about the effects of egg predation for populations of oviparous elasmobranchs, or about the direct and indirect consequences predation upon their energy-rich eggs may have for marine communities.

Key words

Chondrichthyes Batoidei Rajidae Reproduction Egg capsules 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Carriker, M.R. & E.L. Yochelson. 1968. Recent gastropod boreholes and Ordovician cylindrical borings. Contributions to Paleontology, Geological Survey Professional Paper 593-B, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington. 26 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Clark, R.S. 1922. Rays and skates (Raiae). I. Egg-capsules and young. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 12: 577–643.Google Scholar
  3. Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, London. 513 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Grover, C.A. 1972. Predation on egg-cases of the swell shark Cephaloscyllium ventriosum. Copeia 1972: 871–872.Google Scholar
  5. Jensen, A.S. 1914. The selachians of Greenland. pp. 1–40. In: H.F.E. Jungersen & E. Warming (ed.) Mindeskrift i Anledning af Hundredaaret for Japetus Steenstrups Fodsel, Vol. 2, Bianco Lunos Bogtrykkeri, Kobenhavn.Google Scholar
  6. McEachran, J.D., D.F. Boesch & J.A. Musick. 1976. Food division within two sympatric species-pairs of skates (Pisces: Rajidae). Marine Biology 35: 301–317.Google Scholar
  7. McLaughlin, R.H. & A.K. O"Gower. 1971. Life history and underwater studies of a heterodont shark. Ecol. Monogr. 41: 271–289.Google Scholar
  8. Morejohn, G.V. & D.M. Baltz. 1970. Contents of the stomach of an elephant seal. J. Mammalogy 51: 173–174.Google Scholar
  9. Nichols, J.T. 1931. Egg capsule of Scyliorhinus retifer. Copeia 1931: 38–39.Google Scholar
  10. Read, L.J. 1968. Urea and trimethylamineoxide levels in elasmobranch embryos. Biol. Bull. 135: 537–547.Google Scholar
  11. Smith, B.G.1942. the heterodontid sharks: their natural history, and the external development of Heterodontus japonicus based on notes and drawings by Bashford Dean. pp. 647–770+ 7 plates. In: E.W. Gudger (ed.) Bashford Dean Memorial Volume, Archaic Fishes, American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Springer, S. 1967. Social-organization of shark populations. pp. 149–171. In: P.W. Gilbert, R.F. Mathewson & D.P. Rall. Sharks, skates, and rays. The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • David L. Cox
    • 1
  • Thomas J. Koob
    • 1
  1. 1.The Mount Desert Island Biological LaboratorySalsbury CoveU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations