31P and119Sn high resolution solid state CP/MAS NMR study of Al2O3-SnO2 systems
- 172 Downloads
- 13 Citations
Abstract
A series of Al2O3-SnO2 catalysts with the mole ratio of Al2O3 to SnO2 equal to 1:1, 1 ∶ 0.5, 1 ∶ 0.1, 1 ∶ 0.05 and 1 ∶ 0.01 were characterized by31P NMR of adsorbed trimethyl phosphine (TMP) and119Sn MAS NMR spectroscopy. It was found from31P NMR that no Brønsted acid sites exist in these samples. Pure SnO2 shows two different types of Lewis acid sites; in the mixed oxide samples a Lewis peak characteristic of pure Al2O3 is always seen, together with either one or two other Lewis peaks, depending on the Sn concentration.119Sn CP/MAS NMR spectra of the highest Sn-content sample show one narrow line at −603 ppm superimposed on a very broad line, indicating a strong interaction between Al and Sn oxides.
Keywords
Al2O3-SnO2 catalysts acid sites Lewis acid trimethylphosphine 13P NMR 119Sn NMRPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]J.R. Baker, R.L. McCornik and H.W. Haynes Jr., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 26 (1987) 1895.Google Scholar
- [2]M. Absir-Halabi, A. Stanislaus and D.L. Trim, Appl. Catal. 72 (1991) 193.Google Scholar
- [3]R.L. McCornic, J.R. Baker and H.W. Haynes Jr., Energy & Fuels 2 (1988) 740.Google Scholar
- [4]B.C. Gates, J.R. Katzer and G.C.A. Schuit,Chemistry of Catalytic Processes (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979) pp. 259–260.Google Scholar
- [5]M.B. Fleisher, L.O. Golender and M.V. Shimanskaya, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 87 (1991) 745.Google Scholar
- [6]S.M. Riseman, F.E. Massoth, G.M. Dhar and E.M. Eyring, J. Phys. Chem. 86 (1982) 1760.Google Scholar
- [7]S.H.C. Liang and I.D. Gay, J. Catal. 66 (1980) 249.Google Scholar
- [8]I.D. Gay and S.H.C. Liang, J. Catal. 44 (1976) 306.Google Scholar
- [9]I.D. Gay, J. Catal. 48 (1977) 430.Google Scholar
- [10]W.P. Rothwell, W.X. Shen and J.H. Lunsford, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106 (1984) 2452.Google Scholar
- [11]J.H. Lunsford, W.P. Rothwell and W. Shen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107 (1985) 1540.Google Scholar
- [12]P.-J. Chu, A. de Mallmann and J.H. Lunsford, J. Phys. Chem. 95 (1991) 7362.Google Scholar
- [13]P. Kirszensztejn, Mater. Chem. Phys. 27 (1991) 117.Google Scholar
- [14]P. Kirszensztejn, W. Przystajko and T.N. Bell, Catal. Lett. 18 (1993) 391.Google Scholar
- [15]I.D. Gay, J. Magn. Reson. 58 (1984) 413.Google Scholar
- [16]L. Baltusis, J.S. Frye and G.E. Maciel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109 (1987) 40.Google Scholar
- [17]P.-J. Chu, J.H. Lunsford and D.J. Zalewski, J. Magn. Reson. 87 (1990) 68.Google Scholar
- [18]L. Baltusis, J.S. Frye and G.E. Maciel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108 (1986) 7119.Google Scholar
- [19]P.G. Harrison,Chemistry of Tin (Chapman and Hall, New York, 1989) p. 11.Google Scholar
- [20]R. Srinivasan, R.J. DeAngelis and B.H. Davis, J. Catal. 106 (1987) 449.Google Scholar
- [21]F.J.C.M. Todenaer, F. Stoop and V. Ponec, J. Catal. 82 (1983) 1.Google Scholar
- [22]T.C. Sheng and I.D. Gay, J. Catal., in press.Google Scholar
- [23]N.J. Clayden, C.M. Dobson and A. Fern, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. (1989) 843.Google Scholar
- [24]C. Crossement, J. Darville, J.-M. Gilles, J.B. Nagy, C. Fernandez and J.-P. Amoureux, Magn. Reson. Chem. 30 (1992) 263.Google Scholar