Acid-base properties and the directions of oxidative transformation of methane over nickel-based catalysts
- 92 Downloads
- 9 Citations
Abstract
Two completely different behaviors of the oxidative transformation of methane (OTM) were performed on nickel-based catalysts because of different acid-base properties of those catalysts. The relatively acidic LaNiOx and LiNiLaOx/Al2O3 catalysts exhibit excellent performances in the partial oxidation of methane to syngas (POM). However, the relatively basic LiNiLaOx catalyst has a good performance in the oxidative coupling of methane to C2 hydrocarbons (OCM). The redox behaviors of those catalysts and the states of the nickel present were investigated by TPR techniques. TPR results indicated that the active component nickel of the working LaNiOx and LiNiLaOx/Al2O3 catalysts existed in the reduced state, and that of the working LiNiLaOx catalyst existed in the oxidized state under the same reaction conditions. It can be concluded that the acidic property favors keeping the reduced nickel and the reduced nickel is necessary for the POM reaction, whereas the basic property favors keeping the oxidized nickel and the oxidized nickel is necessary for the OCM reaction.
Keywords
acid-base properties oxidative transformation of methane nickel-based catalysts oxidative coupling of methane C2 hydrocarbon partial oxidation of methane syngasPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]Y. Amenomiya, V.I. Briss et al., Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 32 (1990) 163.Google Scholar
- [2]R. Pitchai and K. Klier, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 28 (1986) 13.Google Scholar
- [3]A.M. Maitra, Appl. Catal. A 104 (1993) 11.Google Scholar
- [4]S.C. Tsang, J.B. Claridge and M.L.H. Green, Catal. Today 23 (1995) 3.Google Scholar
- [5]T. Seiyama, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 34 (1992) 281.Google Scholar
- [6]D.J. Driscoll, W. Martir, J.X. Wang and J.H. Lunsford, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107 (1985) 58.Google Scholar
- [7]X.-R. Xia, G.-X. Xiong and X.-X. Guo,Novel Production Methods for Ethylene, Light Hydrocarbons, and Aromatics, eds. L.F. Albright, B.L. Crynes and Nowak (Dekker, New York, 1992) pp. 107–120.Google Scholar
- [8]M. Hatano and K. Otsuka, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. I 85 (1989) 199.Google Scholar
- [9]Q. Miao, Study of the oxidative transformation of methane over the nickel-based catalysts modified by alkali metal oxide and rare-earth oxide, Doctoral Dissertation, Dalian (1995).Google Scholar
- [10]S.-Y. Yuan, B.-C. Liu and Z.-L. Yu, J. Natural Gas Chemistry 2 (1992) 166.Google Scholar
- [11]X.-S. Tang, S.-M. Huang and S.-S. Jing, Chem. J. Chinese Universities 12 (1991) 514.Google Scholar
- [12]J.R.H. Ross, M.C.F. Steel and A. Zeini-Isfahani, J. Catal. 52 (1978) 280.Google Scholar
- [13]Q. Miao, G. Xiong, S. Sheng, W. Chu and X. Guo, in:Proc. 11th Int. Congr. on Catalysis, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. (Elsevier, Amsterdam), in press.Google Scholar
- [14]D.A. Hickman and L.D. Schmidt, Science 259 (1993) 343.Google Scholar
- [15]J.A. Lapszewicz and X.-Z. Jiang, Prepr. Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Pet. Chem. 38 (1993) 815.Google Scholar
- [16]C.T. Au, Y.H. Hu and H.L. Wan, Catal. Lett. 27 (1994) 199.Google Scholar
- [17]Y.H. Hu and E. Ruckenstein, Catal. Lett. 34 (1995) 41.Google Scholar
- [18]T. Ito, J.X. Wang, C.H. Lin and J.H. Lunsford, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107 (1985) 5062.Google Scholar
- [19]D. Dissanyake, J.H. Lunsford and M.P. Rosynek, J. Catal. 146 (1994) 613.Google Scholar