Advertisement

Bulletin géodésique

, Volume 65, Issue 3, pp 151–161 | Cite as

Analysis of tropospheric delay prediction models: comparisons with ray-tracing and implications for GPS relative positioning

  • H. W. Janes
  • R. B. Langley
  • S. P. Newby
Article

Abstract

Ray-tracing is used to examine the accuracy of several well known models for tropospheric delay prediction under varying atmospheric conditions. The models considered include the Hopfield zenith delay model and related mapping functions, the Saastamoinen zenith delay model and mapping function, and three empirical mapping functions based upon the Marini continued fraction form. Modelled delays are benchmarked against ray-tracing solutions for representative atmospheric profiles at various latitudes and seasons. Numerical results are presented in light of the approximations inherent in model formulation. The effect of approximations to the temperature, pressure and humidity structure of the neutral atmosphere are considered; the impact of surface layer anomalies (i.e., inversions) on prediction accuracy is examined; and errors resulting from the neglect of ray bending are illustrated. The influence of surface meteorological parameter measurement error is examined. Finally, model adaptability to local conditions is considered. Recommendations concerning the suitability of the models for GPS relative positioning and their optimal application are made based upon the results presented.

Keywords

Zenith Angle Tropospheric Delay Total Zenith Delay Zenith Delay Reference Atmosphere 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bean, B. R., B. A. Cahoon, C. A. Samson, & G. D. Thayer (1966). “A world atlas of atmospheric radio refractivity.” Environmental Sciences Services Administration, Monograph 1, US Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Berman, A. L. (1976). “The prediction of zenith range refraction from surface measurements of meteorological parameters.” JPL Technical Report 32-1602, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.Google Scholar
  3. Beutler, G., I. Bauersima, W. Gurtner, M. Rothacher, T. Schildknecht & A. Geiger (1988). “Atmospheric refraction and other important biases in GPS carrier phase observations.” Atmospheric Effects on Geodetic Space Measurements, Monograph 12, School of Surveying, University of New South Wales, pp. 15–43.Google Scholar
  4. Black, H. D. (1978). “An easily implemented algorithm for tropospheric range correction.”Journal of Geophysical Research, 38(B4), pp. 1825–1828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Black, H. D. & A. Eisner (1984). “Correcting satellite doppler data for tropospheric effects.”Journal of Geophysical Research, 89(D2), pp. 2616–2626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chao, C. C. (1972). “A model for tropospheric calibration from daily surface and radiosonde balloon measurements.” JPL Technical Memorandum 391-350, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.Google Scholar
  7. Chao, C. C. (1972A). “A new method to predict wet zenith range correction from surface measurements.” JPL Technical Report 32-1526, Vol. XIV, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., pp. 33–37Google Scholar
  8. Cole, A. E. & A. J. Kantor (1978). “Air force reference atmospheres.” US AFGL Technical Report 78-0051, Air Force Geophysics Laboratory, Hanscomb AFB, Mass.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, J. L. (1986). “Atmospheric propagation effects on radio interferometry.” AFGL Technical Report 86-0243, US Air Force Geophysical Laboratory, Hanscom AFB, Mass.Google Scholar
  10. Goad, C. C. & L. Goodman (1974). “A modified Hopfield tropospheric refraction correction model.” Presented Paper, AGU Annual Fall Meeting, San Francisco, Calif.Google Scholar
  11. Hopfield, H. S. (1972). “Tropospheric range error parameters: further studies.” Applied Physics Laboratory Technical Memorandum TG1291, Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, Md.Google Scholar
  12. Janes, H. W., R. B. Langley, & S. P. Newby (1989). “A comparison of several models for the prediction of tropospheric propagation delay.” Proceedings of the 5th International Geodetic Symposium on Satellite Positioning, Las Cruces, N.M., pp. 777–788.Google Scholar
  13. Marini, J. W. (1972). “Correction of satellite tracking data for an arbitrary tropospheric profile.”Radio Science, 7(2), pp. 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. NOAA (1966). “US Standard Atmosphere Supplements, 1966.” NTIS AD 659 543, National Technical Information Service, US Dept. of Commerce, Springfield, Va.Google Scholar
  15. NOAA (1976). “US Standard Atmosphere, 1976.” NOAA — S/T76 — 1562, NTIS ADA 035 728, National Technical Information Service, US Dept. of Commerce, Springfield, Va.Google Scholar
  16. Saastamoinen, J. (1973). “Contributions to the theory of atmospheric refraction.”Bulletin Geodesique, V105-107, pp. 279–298, 383-297, 13–34.Google Scholar
  17. Smith, W. L. (1966). “Note on the relationship between total precipitable water and surface dew point.”Journal of Applied Meteorology, Vol. 5, pp. 726–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yionoulis, S. M. (1970). “Algorithm to compute refraction effects on range measurements.”Journal of Geophysical Research, 75(36), pp. 7636–7637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. W. Janes
    • 1
  • R. B. Langley
    • 2
  • S. P. Newby
    • 2
  1. 1.Usher Canada LimitedEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Geodetic Research LaboratoryUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonCanada

Personalised recommendations