Wear resistance of refractory compounds in the continuous micromachining of titanium and nickel
Test Methods and Properties of Materials
Received:
- 30 Downloads
Conclusions
- 1.
Refractory compounds exhibiting a lower degree of physicochemical reaction with the material being machined possess better wear resistance at high machining speeds.
- 2.
The most wear resitant refractory compounds are hafnium and tungsten carbides in the micromachining of titanium, and aluminum oxide and tungsten carbide in the micromachining of nickel and iron.
- 3.
For the high-speed machining of titanium alloys, use should be made of WC-Co hard alloys, which are more wear resistant than WC-TiC-Co alloys.
Keywords
Oxide Iron Aluminum Titanium Nickel
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature cited
- 1.T. N. Loladze and G. V. Bokuchava, Wear of Diamonds and Diamong Wheels [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1967).Google Scholar
- 2.N. I. Volskii, Grindability of Metals [in Russian], Mashgiz, Moscow-Leningrad (1950).Google Scholar
- 3.R. D. Koester and D. P. Moak, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.,50, No. 6, 290 (1967).Google Scholar
- 4.W. D. Kingery, Property Measurement at High Temperatures, New York (1959).Google Scholar
- 5.L. G. Kuklin, V. I. Sagalov, et al., Increasing the Strength and Wear Resistance of Hard-Alloy Tools [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1968).Google Scholar
- 6.E. I. Duwell and W. I. McDonald, Metals Eng. Quart.,5, No. 2, 56 (1955).Google Scholar
- 7.C. T. Yang and M. C. Shaw, Trans. ASME,77, 645 (1955).Google Scholar
- 8.M. O. Yakobson, Surface Irregularities, Work-Hardening, and Residual Stresses in Machining [in Russian], Mashgiz, Moscow (1956).Google Scholar
- 9.W. A. Hohun, Trans. ASME, No. 4, 42 (1962).Google Scholar
- 10.W. Dawihl, Z. Tech. Phys., Nos. 2, 12 (1940).Google Scholar
- 11.V. S. Rakovskii, in: New Developments in the Uses of Hard Alloys [in Russian], No. 5, Metallurgizdat, Moscow (1946), p. 13.Google Scholar
- 12.K. F. Romanov, Tool Production in the USSR [in Russian], Moscow (1967), p. 215.Google Scholar
- 13.N. F. Kazakov, in: Advanced Engineering Technology [in Russian], Izd-vo AN SSSR, Moscow (1955).Google Scholar
- 14.K. I. Trigger and B. T. Chao, Trans. ASME,78, 1119 (1956).Google Scholar
- 15.H. Takeyama and T. Ono, Trans. ASME, No. 2, 121 (1968).Google Scholar
- 16.I. Stanislao, M. H. Richman, and C. F. James, Trans. ASME, No. 1, 92 (1968).Google Scholar
- 17.M. E. Merchant, E. I. Krabacher, et al., Am. Machinist,98, No. 14, 118 (1954).Google Scholar
- 18.N. F. Kazakov, Vacuum Diffusion Welding [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1968).Google Scholar
- 19.A. L. Burykina and O. V. Evtushenko, Poroshkovaya Met., No. 1, 87 (1965).Google Scholar
- 20.T. N. Loladze, Tool Wear [in Russian], Mashgiz, Moscow (1958).Google Scholar
- 21.N. N. Zorev and Z. M. Fetisova, Machinability of Refractory Alloys [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1966).Google Scholar
- 22.N. I. Bogomolov and L. N. Novikova, Tr. VNIIASh, No. 7, Mashinostroenie, Leningrad (1968).Google Scholar
- 23.T. Hidehiko, Bull. Japan, Sec. Precision Eng.,2, No. 3, 260 (1967).Google Scholar
- 24.E. I. Duwell and W. I. McDonald, Wear-Usura-Verschleiss,4, No. 5, 372 (1961).Google Scholar
- 25.A. P. Semenov and V. V. Pozdnyakov, Mashinovedenie, No. 1 (1967).Google Scholar
- 26.I. I. Kornilov, “Solubility of chemical elements in titanium,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Otd. Khim. Nauk, No. 3, 392 (1954).Google Scholar
- 27.V. N. Eremenko, Titanium and Its Alloys [in Russian], Izd-vo AN USSR, Kiev (1960).Google Scholar
- 28.H. C. Child and A. L. Dalton, Machinability, Iron and Steel Institute, London (1967), p. 139.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Consultants Bureau 1971