Vasomotor reactions of the abdominal viscera at different arterial pressures

  • V. P. Kulagina
Article
Received:
  • 13 Downloads

Summary

A study was made of the vasomotor reactions of abdominal organs (the kidneys, spleen, intestine) by resistography in electric stimulation of the peripheral end of the splanchnic nerve with various intensity and frequency. It is shown that against the background of increased pressure, both vasodilatation and vasoconstriction occurred in lower intensity and frequency in comparison with the vascular reactions in the normal blood pressure level. Conversely, the thresholds of vasomotor reactions increase when the initial pressure level is diminished. This indicated that the vasomotor effects could be replaced by functionally opposite ones in the same nerve influences, depending on the initial state of vessels.

Keywords

Public Health Blood Pressure Lower Intensity Arterial Pressure Electric Stimulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    A. M. Blinova, G. N. Aronova, and K. E. Serebryanik. In the book: Problems in Experimental Hypertension and Hypertensive Disease [in Russian], No. 3, p. 46. Moscow, 1953.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. N. Gorev, M. A. Kondratovich, and M. F. Shuba. In the book: Problems in the Physiology and Pathology of Vascular Tone [in Russian], p. 17, Kiev, 1961.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. M. Rodionov and V. P. Kulagina. Byull. éksper. biol., 2, 13 (1962).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Z. T. Samoilova. In the book: Hypertensive Disease [in Russian], No. 5, p. 112. Moscow, 1958.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. L. Tarakhovskii and V. L. Fastovskii. Vrach. delo, 5, 489 (1960).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. M. Khayutin. Fiziol. zh. SSSR, 7, 645 (1958).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. C. Burton and F. Girling, J. physiol (Lond.), 1951., Vol. 115, p. 57.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Girling, Amer. journ Physiol., 1952, 170, 131.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. B. Gordon and A. Nogueira, Circulat. Res., 1962, Vol. 10, t. 1, p. 269.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. H. Page and R. D. Taylor, Circulation, 1950, Vol. 1, p. 1233.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Z. Supek and B. Uroic, Biol. glasnik. Hrvatsko pridodose drustvo, 1960, Vol. 13, p. 387.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Tripod and H. J. Bein, Helv. physiol. pharmacol. Acta, 1960, Vol. 18, p. 394.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau Enterprises, Inc. 1964

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. P. Kulagina
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of PathophysiologyInstitute of Therapy of the AMN SSSRMoscow

Personalised recommendations