Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 259–281 | Cite as

Memory in mathematical understanding

  • Victor Byers
  • Stanley Erlwanger


Whatever cognitive processes are involved in understanding mathematics, it is clear that one of them is learning. No one is born with an understanding of measure theory, abstract algebra or general topology; the very name ‘mathematics’ means “that which is to be learned” (Boyer, 1968). One of the outcomes of learning is remembered knowledge. Indeed it is our contention that memory plays an essential role in the understanding of mathematics, However, what it is that is remembered by students who ‘understand mathematics’ in contrast to those who do not is by no means a trivial question. In fact, we would like to suggest that there is a gap in this connection between recent developments in memory research and the theory and practice of mathematics education. A second purpose of the present article is to survey briefly the orgins of this gap.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allport, D. A.: 1980, ‘Patterns and actions: cognitive mechanisms are content-specific’, in G.Claxton (ed.):Cognitive Psychology: New Directions, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 26–64.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. R. and Bower, G. H.: 1973,Human Associative Memory, Wiley, Halstead Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ausubel, D. P.: 1968,Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 113–114.Google Scholar
  4. Ausubel, D. P.: 1971, ‘Some psychological and educational limitations of learning by discovery’, in D. B. Aichele and R. E. Reyes (eds.):Reading in Secondary School Mathematics, Prindle, Weber and Schmidt, pp. 193–209.Google Scholar
  5. Baddeley, A. D.: 1976,The Psychology of Memory, Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Bartlett, F. C.: 1932,Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bell, A. W.: 1976,The Learning of General Mathematical Strategies, Ph.D. Thesis, Centre for Mathematical Education, University of Nottingham, p. 9.18.Google Scholar
  8. Boyer, C. B.: 1968,A History of Mathematics, Wiley, p. 53.Google Scholar
  9. Branca, N. A.: 1980, ‘Communication of mathematical structure and its relationship to achievement’,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 11, 37–49.Google Scholar
  10. Bruner, J. S.: 1961, ‘The act of discovery’,Harvard Educational Review 31, 21–32.Google Scholar
  11. Bruner, J. S.: 1962,The Process of Education, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bruner, J. S.: 1973,Beyond the Information Given: Studies in the Psychology of Knowing, Norton.Google Scholar
  13. Burton, L.: 1984, ‘Mathematical thinking: the struggle for meaning’,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 15, 1, 35–49.Google Scholar
  14. Butler, H. C. and Wren, F.: 1941,The Teaching of Secondary Mathematics, 1 st ed., McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Byers, V.: 1980, ‘What does it mean to understand mathematics?’,International Journal of Mathematics Education Science and Technology 11, 1, 1–10.Google Scholar
  16. Byers, V. and Erlwanger, S. H.: 1984, ‘Content and form in mathematics’,Educational Studies in Mathematics 15, 259–275.Google Scholar
  17. Byers, V. and Herscovics, N.: 1977, ‘Understanding school mathematics’,Mathematics Teaching 81.Google Scholar
  18. Carry, L. B., Lewis, C. and Bernard, J. F.: 1980,Psychology of Equation Solving: An Information Processing Study, Final Technical Report, Dept. of Curriculum & Instruction, University of Texas At Austin.Google Scholar
  19. Claxton, G.: 1980, ‘Remembering and understanding’, in G. Claxton (ed.):Cognitive Psychology: New Directions, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 197–235.Google Scholar
  20. Claxton, G.: 1980, ‘Cognitive psychology: a suitable case for what sort of treatment?’, in G. Claxton (ed.):Cognitive Psychology: New Directions, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
  21. Collins, A. M. and Quillian, M. R.: 1972, ‘How to make a language user’, in E. Tulvig and W. Donaldson (eds.):Organization of Memory, Academic Press, pp. 309–351.Google Scholar
  22. Davis, E. J.: 1978, ‘A model for understanding understanding in mathematics’,Arithmetic Teacher, September.Google Scholar
  23. Davis, R. R.: 1983, ‘Complex mathematical cognition’, in H. P.Ginsburg (ed.):The Development of Mathematical Thinking, Academic Press, New York, pp. 254–290.Google Scholar
  24. Erlwanger, S. H.: 1973, ‘Benny's conception of rules and answers in IPI mathematics’,Journal of Childrens' Mathematical Behaviour 1, 2.Google Scholar
  25. Flavell, J. H.: 1977,Cognitive Development, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  26. Freemont, H.: 1971, ‘New mathematics and old dilemmas’, in D. B. Aichele and R. E. Reyes (eds.):Readings in Secondary School Mathematics, Prindle, Weber and Schmidt, p. 4.Google Scholar
  27. Gagné, R. M.: 1968, ‘Learning hierarchies’,Educational Psychologist 6, 1–9.Google Scholar
  28. Gagné, R. M.: 1970,Conditions of Learning, 2nd Ed., Holt Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  29. Gagné, R. M.: 1983, ‘Some issues in the psychology of mathematics instruction’,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 14, 7–18.Google Scholar
  30. Gagné, R. M. and White, R. T.: 1978, ‘Memory structures and learning outcomes’,Review of Educational Research,48, 2, 187–222.Google Scholar
  31. Geeslin, W. E. and Shavelson, R. J.: 1975, ‘Comparison of content structure and cognitive structure in high school students' learning of probability’,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 6, 109–120.Google Scholar
  32. Ginsburg, H.: 1977,Children's Arithmetic: The Learning Process, D. van Nostrand, pp. 128–129.Google Scholar
  33. Greeno, J. G.: 1973, ‘The structure of memory and the process of solving problems’, in R. L. Solso, (ed.):Contemporary Issues in Cognitive Psychology: The Loyola Symposium, Winston, pp. 103–134.Google Scholar
  34. Greer, B.: 1981, ‘Cognitive psychology and mathematical thinking’,For the Learning of Mathematics 1, 3, 22–24.Google Scholar
  35. Hebb, D. O.: 1972,Textbook of Psychology, 3rd ed., Saunders, p. 99.Google Scholar
  36. Hilgard, E. R.: 1957,Introduction to Psychology, 2nd ed., Harcourt Brace, pp. 285–302.Google Scholar
  37. Jenks, S. M., Peck, D. M. and Chatterley, L. J.: 1980, ‘Why blame the kids? We teach mistakes!’,Arithmetic Teacher 28, 2, 38–41.Google Scholar
  38. Krutetskii, V. A.: 1976,The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in School Children, in J. Kilpatrick and I. Wirszup (eds.): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Langford, F. G.: 1972,Some Computational Strategies of Seventh Grade Pupils, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.Google Scholar
  40. Lehman, H.: 1977, ‘On understanding mathematics’,Educational Theory 27, 2.Google Scholar
  41. Mandler, G.: 1972, ‘Organization and recognition’, in E. Tulvig and W. Donaldson (eds.):Organization of Memory, Academic Press, pp. 146–167.Google Scholar
  42. Mayer, R. E.: 1977,Thinking and Problem Solving: An Introduction to Human Cognition and Learning, Scott, Foresman & Co.Google Scholar
  43. Mayer, R. E. and Greeno, J. G.: 1972, ‘Structural differences between learning outcomes produced by different instructional methods’,Journal of Educational Psychology 63, 165–173.Google Scholar
  44. Michener, E. R.: 1978, ‘Understanding understanding mathematics’,Cognitive Science 2, 361–383.Google Scholar
  45. Miller, G. A.: 1956, ‘The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information’,Psychological Review 63, 81–96.Google Scholar
  46. Morgan, C. T. and Deese, J.: 1957,How to Study, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  47. Morris, J.: 1981, ‘Math anxiety: teaching to avoid it’,Mathematics Teacher 74, 6, 414.Google Scholar
  48. Neisser, U.: 1978, ‘What are the important questions?’, in M. M. Guneberg, P. E. Morris, and R. N. Sykes (eds.):Practical Aspects of Memory, Academic Press, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
  49. Osgood, C. E.: 1953,Method and Theory in Experimental Psychology, Oxford, p. 570.Google Scholar
  50. Paivio, A.: 1971,Imagery and Verbal Processes, Holt, Reinhart & Winston.Google Scholar
  51. Postman, L.: 1972, ‘A pragmatic view of organization theory’, in E. Tulvig and W. Donaldson (eds.):Organization of Memory, Academic Press, pp. 3–48.Google Scholar
  52. Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B.: 1973,Memory and Intelligence, Basic Books.Google Scholar
  53. Radatz, H.: 1979, ‘Error analysis in mathematics education’,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 10, 163–171.Google Scholar
  54. Resnick, L. B.: 1983, ‘A developmental theory of number understanding’, in H. P.Ginsburg (ed.):The Development of Mathematical Thinking, Academic Press, New York, pp. 109–151.Google Scholar
  55. Riley, M. S., Green, J. G. and Heller, J. I.: 1983, ‘Development of children's problem-solving ability in arithmetic’, in H. P.Ginsburg (ed.):The Development of Mathematical Thinking, Academic Press, New York, pp. 153–196.Google Scholar
  56. Sadowski, B. R. and McIlveen, D. H.: 1982, ‘Diagnosis and remediation of sentence-solving error patterns’,Arithmetic Teacher 31, 5, 42–45.Google Scholar
  57. Scopes, P. G.: 1973,Mathematics in Secondary Schools—A Teaching Approach, Cambridge University Press, p. 86.Google Scholar
  58. Shavelson, R. J.: 1972, ‘Some aspects of the correspondence between content structure and cognitive structure in physics instruction’,Journal of Educational Psychology 63, 225–234.Google Scholar
  59. Shavelson, R. J.: 1974, ‘Methods for examining representations of a subject-matter structure in a student's memory’,Journal of Research in Science Teaching 11, 231–249.Google Scholar
  60. Shulman, L. S.: 1970, ‘Psychology of mathematics education’, inMathematics Education, Yearbook 69, National Society for the Study of Education, Part I, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  61. Skemp, R. R.: 1976, ‘Relational understanding and instrumental understanding’,Mathematics Teaching 77.Google Scholar
  62. Skemp, R. R.: 1979, ‘Goals of learning and qualities of understanding’,Mathematics Teaching 88.Google Scholar
  63. Skemp, R. R.: 1979,Intelligence, Learning and Action, Wiley, pp. 259–260.Google Scholar
  64. Suydam, M. N. and Dessart, D. J.: 1980, ‘Skill learning’, in R. J.Shumway (ed.):Research in Mathematics Education, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, pp. 207–243.Google Scholar
  65. Tulvig, E.: 1972, ‘Episodic and semantic memory’, in E. Tulvig and W. Donaldson (eds.):Organization of Memory, Academic Press, pp. 381–403.Google Scholar
  66. Vinner, S.: 1981, Personal communication.Google Scholar
  67. Wertheimer, M.: 1959,Productive Thinking, enl. ed., Harper, p. 11.Google Scholar
  68. Wittrock, M. C.: 1974, ‘A generative model of mathematics learning’,Journal of Research in Mathematics Education 5, 181–196.Google Scholar
  69. Woodworth, R. S. and Schlossberg, H.: 1954,Experimental Psychology, 2nd ed., Holt, p. 730.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor Byers
    • 1
  • Stanley Erlwanger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations