Densification during the hot pressing of magnesium oxide with additions
- 41 Downloads
Summary
- 1.
The effect of various additions depends on the type of magnesium oxide. Thus, the additions investigated fail to raise the density of hot-pressed specimens from “p” magnesium oxide for luminophores, but enable the final pressing temperature to be lowered by 100–300°C. For extra-light magnesium oxide, the additions have practically no effect on the limiting temperature securing the maximum densification of specimens, but increase the density of the latter.
- 2.
It was established that many of the additions lower the density of hot-pressed specimens at limiting pressing temperatures above 1600–1700°C (“p” magnesium oxide for luminophores) or above 1400°C (extra-light magnesium oxide) because of an increase of sealed porosity, which is probably due to the generation of excess vacancies on pressure removal.
- 3.
When the amount of an addition is raised from 0.5 to 4 mol.%, densification shifts into the region of lower temperatures, while the density may actually increase.
- 4.
The densification kinetics during the hot pressing of the two grades of magnesium oxide with additions are characterized by proportionality between ΔD/D0 and t1/3. It is shown that the increase in the width of the nonporous crust of periclase crystals at the final stages of hot pressing is also proportional to t1/3. This indicates a diffusion mechanism of the elimination of sealed (intragranular) pores during hot pressing and confirms the diffusion character of densification at the last stages of the hot pressing of magnesium oxide.
Keywords
Oxide Porosity Magnesium Final Stage Diffusion MechanismPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature cited
- 1.M.S. Koval'chenko and G.V. Samsonov, Poroshkovaya Met., No. 2, 3 (1961).Google Scholar
- 2.M.S. Koval'chenko and G.V. Samsonov, Poroshkovaya Met., No. 5, 3 (1961).Google Scholar
- 3.M.S. Koval'chenko and G.V. Samsonov, Poroshkovaya Met., No. 1, 20 (1961).Google Scholar
- 4.D.N. Poluboyarinov and E.I. Shal'nov, Zh. Vses. Khim. Obshch. im. Mendeleeva,8, 2 (1963).Google Scholar
- 5.R.M. Spriggs, L.A. Brissette, and T. Vasilos, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.,10, 508 (1963).Google Scholar
- 6.A.S. Berezhnoi, Sb. Tr. 3 Veses. Seveshch. po Ogneuporn. Mater., Izd. AN SSSR (1947).Google Scholar
- 7.J.W. Nelson and I.B. Cutler, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.,44, 10, 406 (1958).Google Scholar
- 8.I. Jones, R.K. Maitra, and I.B. Cutler, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.,41, 9, 353 (1958).Google Scholar
- 9.P.P. Budnikov, T.N. Keshishyan, and V. K. Yanovskii, DAN SSSR,138, 2, 665 (1961).Google Scholar
- 10.Y.K. Layden and M.C. Meguaric, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.,42, 2, 89 (1959).Google Scholar
- 11.Collection: Ceramic Production Processes (ed. W.D. Kingery) [Russian translation], IL, Moscow (1960), p. 107.Google Scholar
- 12.Ya.E. Geguzin, Microscopic Defects in Metals, Metallurgizdat (1962).Google Scholar
- 13.L.M. Atlas, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.,40, 6 (1957).Google Scholar
- 14.C.M. Schloudt and D.M. Roy, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull.,47, 4, 271 (1964).Google Scholar
- 15.V.A. Bron, Poroshkovaya Met., No. 5, 36 (1962).Google Scholar
- 16.V.A. Bron, Tr. V Soveshch. po Éksperim. i Tekhn. Miner, i Petrografii, Izd. AN SSSR (1958), p. 471.Google Scholar
- 17.É.V. Degtyareva, Neorgan. Mater.,1, 2, 281 (1961).Google Scholar
- 18.I.L. Livshits and V.V. Slezov, Fiz. Metal, i Metalloved.,13, 6 (1962).Google Scholar
- 19.I.L. Livshits and V.V. Slezov, Éksperim. i Teor. Fiz.,8, 352 (1958).Google Scholar
- 20.T. Vasilos and R.M. Spriggs, JACS,46, 10, 493 (1963).Google Scholar
- 21.F.R.N. Nabarro, Ref. Conf. on Strength of Solids (London, Phys. Soc., Vol. 47, 1947); C. Herring, J. Appl. Phys.,21, 473 (1950).Google Scholar
- 22.B.Ya. Pines, Essays on Metal Physics, Kharkov State Univ. Press (1962).Google Scholar
- 23.Ya.E. Geguzin, L.O. Markon, and B.Ya. Pines, DAN SSSR,47, 4, 577 (1952).Google Scholar