Catalysis Letters

, Volume 9, Issue 3–4, pp 311–328 | Cite as

Directions of theoretical and experimental investigations into the mechanisms of heterogeneous catalysis

  • G. A. Somorjai
Article

Abstract

The roles of the atomic structure and the electronic structure of the active surface sites in bonding of reactants and causing bond breaking or bond formation have been the focus of theoretical studies. In addition to calculations on static systems, usually clusters, modelling of the transition states and the dynamics of elementary reaction steps (adsorption, dissociation, surface diffusion, desorption) have been performed. Variations of electronic structure of elements across the periodic table have been shown to be responsible for the unique importance of transition metals in catalysis.

Experimental studies utilize catalysts with well-characterized structure (zeolites, crystal surfaces) and information about surface structure, composition and chemical bonding of adsorbates becomes available on the molecular level. Deliberate alteration of catalyst structure, surface composition by alloying and electronic structure by addition of electron donor and electron acceptor promoters have been utilized to modify reaction rates and selectivity. This way many of the molecular ingredients of heterogeneous catalytic reactions have been identified.

In recent years evidence has been accumulating that indicates periodic and long term restructuring of the catalyst surface as necessary for chemical change and reaction turnover. These findings point to the need of time resolved studies and in-situ investigations of both the substrate and the adsorbate sides of the surface chemical bonds simultaneously on a time scale shorter than the reaction turnover frequency.

Close collaboration between theorists and experimentalists is essential if we are to succeed in designing heterogeneous catalysts.

Keywords

Concepts of catalysis activity trends surface restructuring cluster-like bonding rough surface reactivity building complex catalyst systems bimetallic systems oxide-metal interfaces 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J.H. Sinfelt, Adv. Catal. 23 (1973) 91.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    W.M.H. Sachtler and J. Fahrenfort, in:Proc. 12th Int. Congress of Catalysis, (1960) p. 831.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    G.A. Somorjai in:Chemistry in Two Dimensions: Surfaces (Cornell Univ. Press. 1981), p. 300.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    M. Boudart, Adv. Catal. 20 (1969) 153.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    F. Zaera, A. Gellman and G.A. Somorjai, Acct. of Chemical Research 19 (1986) 24.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    S.W. Wang, D.F. Ogletree, M.A. Van Hove and G.A. Somorjai, Adv. in Quantum Chem. 20 (1989) 2.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    S. Bouwens, P.C. Konigsberger, V. deBeer and R. Prins, Catal. Lett., 5 (1990) 273.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    C.M. Mate, M.R. Lorenz and V.J. Novatay, J. Chem. Phys. 90 (1989) 7550.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    R.Y. Shen, Nature, 337 (1989) 6207.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    J.K. Nørskov, Rep. Prog. Phys. 53 (1990) 1253.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    L. Salem, J. Phys. Chem. 89 (1985) 576.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    R. Hoffman, Revs. Mod. Phys. 60 (1988) 601.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    W.J. Hunt, P.I. Hay and W.A. Goddard III, J. Chem. Phys. 57 1972) 738.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    R.D. Levine and G.A. Somorjai, Surf. Sci 232 (1990) 407.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    L.M. Falicov and G.A. Somorjai, Proc. Natl. Acad. of Sci. 82 (1985) 2207.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    J.C. Tully, J. Chem. Phys. 93 (1990) 1061.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    I. Panes, P. Siegbahn and U. Wahlgren, J. Chem. Phys. 112 (1987) 325.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    P. Sautet, Cat. Lett., this issue, p. 245.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    P.J. Feibelman and D.R. Hamann, Surf. Sci. 234 (1990) 377.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    A.B. Anderson, JACS 99 (1977) 696.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    E. Schustorovich and R. Baetzold, Science 227 (1985) 876.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    M.A. Van Hove, in:Chemistry and Physics of Solid Surfaces VII, eds. R. Vanselow and R.F. Howe (Springer, Heidelberg, 1988)Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    J.B. Pendry, R.W. Joyner and G.R. Darling, Surf. Sci. 221 (1989) 69.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    F. Jona and P.M. Marcus, in:The Structure of Surfaces (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1988) p. 80.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    B. Bent and G.A. Somorjai, J. Adv. Colloid and Interface Sci. 29 (1989) 223.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    M.A. Van Hove and G.A. Somorjai, Prog. in Surf. Sci. 30 (1989) 201.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    M.A. Van Hove and G.A. Somorjai, Catal. Lett. 1 (1988) 433.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    G.A. Somorjai, Phys. Chem. 94 (1990) 1013.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    H. Conrad, G. Ertl, J. Koch and E.E. Latta, Surf. Sci. 43 (1974) 462.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    E.L. Garfunkel and G.A. Somorjai, in:Alkali Adsorption on Metals and Semiconductors (Elsevier, 1989) p. 319.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    C.M. Mate, C.T. Kao and G.A. Somorjai, Surf. Sci. 206 (1988) 145.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    J.E. Crowell, W.T. Tysoe and G.A. Somorjai, J. Phys. Chem. 89(1986) 1598.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    D.R. Strongin and G.A. Somorjai, J. Catal. 109 (1988) 51.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    D.F. Ogletree, R.Q. Hwang, D.M. Zeglinski, A. Lopez Vazquez-de-Parga, G.A. Somorjai and M. Salmeron, JVST (1991) in press.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Y.L. Lam, J. Criado and M. Boudart, Nouv. J. Chim. 1 (6) (1977) 461.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    K.J. Williams, A.B. Boffa, M.E. Levin, M. Salmeron, A.T. Bell and G.A. Somorjai, Catal. Lett. 5 (1990) 385.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© J.C. Baltzer A.G. Scientific Publishing Company 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. A. Somorjai
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Chemistry DepartmentUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeley
  2. 2.Lawrence Berkeley LaboratoryBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations