Topoi

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 107–121

Externalism, proper inferentiality and sensible evidentialism

  • Stephen J. Wykstra
Article
  • 58 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alston, Williams: 1983, ‘Christian experience and Christian belief’, in Alvin Plantinga and Nicholas Wolterstorff (eds.),Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 103–134.Google Scholar
  2. Alston, William: 1988a, ‘Religious diversity and perceptual knowledge of God’,Faith and Philosophy 5, 433–448.Google Scholar
  3. Alston, William: 1988b, ‘The perception of God’, in Michael Beaty and Richard Lee (eds.),Philosophical Topics 16, Fall 1988, 23–52.Google Scholar
  4. Alston, William: 1991,Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Alston, William: 1993a, ‘On knowing that we know: the application to religious knowledge’, in C. Stephen Evans and Merold Westfal (eds.),Christian Perspectives on Religious Knowledge, Eerdmans, Grand Rapid, Michigan, pp. 15–39.Google Scholar
  6. Alston, William: 1993b, ‘Epistemic desiderata’,Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LIII, 527–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Audi, Robert: 1986, ‘Direct justification, evidential dependence, and theistic belief’, in Robert Audi and William J. Wainwright (eds.),Rationality, Religious Belief, and Moral Commitment, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 139–166.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, Kelly James: 1990,Return to Reason: A Critique of Enlightenment Evidentialism and a Defense of Reason and Belief in God, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, Michigan.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, Kelly James, ed.: 1992,Our Knowledge of God, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  10. Duncan, David James: 1983,The River Why, Sierra Club Books, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  11. Engel, Mylan Jr.: 1992, ‘Personal and doxastic justification in epistemology’,Philosophical Studies 67: 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans, C. Stephen: 1990, ‘Apologetics in a new key: relieving protestant anxieties over natural theology’, in William L. Craig and Mark S. McLeod (eds.),The Logic of Rational Theism, Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, N.Y., pp. 66–75.Google Scholar
  13. Evans, C. Stephen, and Westphal, Merold, ed.: 1993,Christian Perspectives on Religious Knowledge, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, Michigan.Google Scholar
  14. Hasker, William: 1986, ‘On justifying the Christian practice’,The New Scholasticism 60, 139–155.Google Scholar
  15. Hoitenga, Dewey: 1991,Faith and Reason from Plato to Plantinga: An Introduction to Reformed Epistemology, SUNY Press, Albany, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Konyndyk, Kenneth: 1986, ‘Faith and evidentialism’, in Robert Audi and William J. Wainwright (eds.),Rationality, Religious Belief, and Moral Commitment, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 82–108.Google Scholar
  17. Kretzmann, Norman: 1992, ‘Evidence against evidentialism’, in Kelly James Clark (ed.),Our Knowledge of God, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mavrodes, George: 1983, ‘Jerusalem and Athens revisited’, in Alvin Plantinga and Nicholas Wolterstorff (eds.),Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 192–218.Google Scholar
  19. Mitchell, Basil: 1973,The Justification of Religious Belief, Seabury, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Pappas, George S.: 1979, ‘Basing relations’, in George Pappas (ed.),Justification and Knowledge, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Phillips, D. Z.: 1988,Faith After Foundationalism, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Plantinga, Alvin: 1983, ‘Reason and belief in God’, in Alvin Plantinga and Nicholas Wolterstorff (eds.),Faith and Rationality, University of Notre Dam Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 16–93.Google Scholar
  23. Plantinga, Alvin: 1986, ‘Coherentism and the evidentialist objection to belief in God’, in Robert Audi and William J. Wainwright (ed.),Rationality, Religious Belief, and Moral Commitment, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 109–129.Google Scholar
  24. Plantinga, Alvin: 1991, ‘The prospects for natural theology’, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.),Philosophical Perspectives 5: Philosophy of Religion, 1991, Ridgeview Publishing, Atascadero, California, pp. 287–316.Google Scholar
  25. Plantinga, Alvin: 1993a,Warrant: The Current Debate, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  26. Plantinga, Alvin: 1993b,Warrant and Proper Function, Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Plantinga, Alvin: (forthcoming),Warranted Christian Belief, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  28. Pojman, Louis: 1987, ‘Can religious belief be rational?’, in Louis P. Pojman (ed.),Philosophy of Religion: An Anthology, Wadsworth, Belmont, California, pp. 480–490.Google Scholar
  29. Quinn, Philip L.: 1991, ‘Epistemic parity and religious argument’, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.),Philosophical Perspectives 5: Philosophy of Religion, 1991, Ridgeview Publishing, Atascadero, California, pp. 317–341.Google Scholar
  30. Radcliffe, Elizabeth S., and White, Carol J., eds.: 1993,Faith and Practice: Essays on Justifying Religious Belief, Open Court, Chicago.Google Scholar
  31. Reid, Thomas: 1970,An Inquiry into the Human Mind, ed. Timothy J. Duggan, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  32. Reiter, David: 1994, ‘Engel on internalism and externalism in epistemology’, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  33. Sennett, James: 1993, ‘Reformed epistemology and epistemic duty’, in Elizabeth S. Radcliffe and Carol J. White (eds.),Faith and Practice: Essays on Justifying Religious Belief, Open Court, Chicago, pp. 196–207.Google Scholar
  34. Swinburne, Richard: 1979,The Existence of God, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  35. Williams, Clifford: 1994, ‘Kierkegaardian suspicion and properly basic beliefs’,Religious Studies 30, 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wolterstorff, Nicholas: 1983, ‘Can belief in God be rational if it has no foundations?’, in Alvin Plantinga and Nicholas Wolterstorff (eds.),Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 135–186.Google Scholar
  37. Wolterstorff, Nicholas: 1986, ‘The migration of the theistic arguments: from natural theology to evidentialist apologetics’, in Robert Audi and William J. Wainwright (eds.),Rationality, Religious Belief, and Moral Commitment, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 38–81.Google Scholar
  38. Wolterstorff, Nicholas: 1987,Lament for a Son, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, Michigan.Google Scholar
  39. Wolterstorff, Nicholas: 1988, ‘Once more: evidentialism — this time, social’, in Michael Beaty and Richard Lee (eds.),Philosophical Topics 16, Fall 1988, 53–74.Google Scholar
  40. Wolterstorff, Nicholas: 1992, ‘What reformed epistemology is not’,Perspectives 7, November, 14–16.Google Scholar
  41. Wykstra, Stephen J.: 1989, ‘Toward a sensible evidentialism: on the notion of “Needing Evidence”’, in William L. Rowe and William J. Wainwright (eds.),Philosophy of Religion: Selected Readings, second edition, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, pp. 426–437.Google Scholar
  42. Wykstra, Stephen J.: 1990, ‘Reasons, redemptions and realism: the axiological roots of rationality in science and religion’, in Michael D. Beaty (ed.),Christian Theism and the Problems of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 118–161.Google Scholar
  43. Zagzebski, Linda, ed.: 1993,Rational Faith: Catholic Responses to Reformed Epistemology, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen J. Wykstra
    • 1
  1. 1.Calvin CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations