Space Science Reviews

, Volume 72, Issue 1–2, pp 137–148 | Cite as

The large-scale structure of the heliospheric current sheet during the Ulysses epoch

  • J. Todd Hoeksema
Session 2: Large-Scale Heliospheric Structure

Abstract

Ulysses is traversing the Sun's polar regions for the first time a year or two before solar minimum. If the heliospheric magnetic field behaves as we expect, the heliospheric current sheet (HCS) during this stage of the sunspot cycle should be quite stable and lie nearly flat, close to the equator. The high latitude solar fields should be unipolar and nearing their maximum strength. The overlying polar coronal holes should be well developed, producing a nearly uniform high-speed solar wind. Because the Sun's polar fields liver longer than any other solar magnetic phenomenon, Ulysses will remain within a single coronal hole for an extended period and probe its structures in a unique way.

Of course everything will almost certainly not turn out to be as quiet and well-ordered as we expect. We know now that the photospheric field strength in the northern polar cap is less than the south. What will this mean for the solar wind speed and the magnitude of the interplanetary magnetic field? Solar and coronal observations suggest that the first magnetic signatures of the next solar cycle may already be emerging at high latitudes. Will Ulysses sense these fields “leaking” into the heliosphere or is the interplanetary magnetic structure completely dominated by the large-scale field as the models currently predict? How will the sources of variations in field, velocity, density, and composition fit into our conceptual picture?

Ulysses' rapid dash from south to north provides a unique opportunity to determine the latitudinal width of the equatorial region influenced by the HCS. This rapid change in latitude over a short interval during which the structure should be stable, should provide a definitive measurement of the latitudinal gradients of various quantities relative to the heliomagnetic equator.

In the next several years Ulysses will gradually decrease in latitude, eventually meeting the HCS as it gradually expands away from the equator during the rising part of the cycle. It will then race the HCS to the poles as maximum approaches. The situation in six years, at solar maximum, will be radically different. There will be no unipolar high latitude field, the HCS will extend to the poles, existing structures will be less stable, and there will likely even be multiple current sheets. Ulysses will have another opportunity to confirm or disprove our understanding of the high latitude heliosphere in a much different environment. The extended mission is essential to advance our understanding of the heliospheric field at the extremes of the solar cycle.

Key words

Heliospheric Current Sheet Ulysses 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altrock, R.C.: 1988, ‘Variation of Solar Coronal Fe XIV 5303A Emission During Solar Cycle 21’, in R.C. Altrock, ed(s).,Solar and Stellar Coronal Structure and Dynamics, NSO/Sacramento Peak: Sunsport, New Mexico, 414.Google Scholar
  2. Altschuler, M.D. and Newkirk, G. Jr.: 1969, ‘Magnetic Fields and the Structure of the Solar Corona’,Solar Phys. 9, 131.Google Scholar
  3. Balogh, A., Erdos, G., Forsyth, R.J., and Smith, E.J.: 1993, ‘The Evolution of the Interplanetary Sector Structure in 1992’,Geophys. Res. L. 20, 2331.Google Scholar
  4. Behannon, K.W., Burlaga, L.F., Hoeksema, J.T., and Klein, L.W.: 1989, ‘Spatial Variation and Evolution of Heliosphere Sector Structure’,J. Geophys. Res. 94, 1245.Google Scholar
  5. Bogdan, T.J. and Low, B.C.: 1986, ‘The Three-Dimensional Structure of Magnetostatic Atmospheres II. Modeling the Large-scale Corona’,Astrophys. J. 306, 271.Google Scholar
  6. Bruno, R., Burlaga, L.F., and Hundhausen, A.J.: 1984, ‘K-Coronameter Observations and Potential Field Model Comparison in 1976 and 1977’,J. Geophys. Res. 89, 5381.Google Scholar
  7. Farnham, T.L. and Meech, K.J.: 1994, ‘Comparison of the Plasma Tails of Four Comets: P/Halley, Okazaki-Levy-Rudenko, Austin, and Levy’,Astrophys. J. 91, 419.Google Scholar
  8. Gazis, P.R., Mihalov, J.D., Barnes, A., and Lazarus, A.J., and Smith, E.J.: 1989, ‘Pioneer and Voyager Observations of the Solar Wind at Large Heliocentric Distances and Latitudes’,Geophys. Res. Let. 16, 223.Google Scholar
  9. Harvey, K.L.: 1992, ‘The Cyclic Behavior of Solar Activity’ in K. harvey, ed(s).,The Solar Cycle, A.S.P. Conf. Proc. 27: San Francisco, CA, 335.Google Scholar
  10. Hoeksema, J.T., and Scherrer, P.H.: 1987, ‘Rotation of the Coronal Magnetic Field’,Astrophys. J. 318, 428.Google Scholar
  11. Hoeksema, J.T., Wilcox, J.M., and Scherrer, P.H.: 1982, ‘Structure of the Heliospheric Current Sheet in the Early Portion of Sunspot Cycle 21’,J. Geophys. Res. 87, 10331.Google Scholar
  12. Hoeksema, J.T., Wilcox, J.M., and Scherrer, P.H.: 1983, ‘The Structure of the Heliospheric Current Sheet: 1978–1982’,J. Geophys. Res. 88, 9910.Google Scholar
  13. Levine, R.H.: 1982, ‘Open Magnetic Fields and the Solar Cycles, I’,Solar Phys 79, 203.Google Scholar
  14. Niedner, M.B. and Brandt, J.C.: 1978, ‘Interplanetary Gas XXIII: Plasma Tail Disconnection Events in Comets: Evidence for Magnetic Field Line Reconnection at Interplanetary Sector Boundaries?’,Astrophys. J. 223, 655.Google Scholar
  15. Phillips, J.L., Balogh, A., Bame, S.J., Goldstein, B.E., Gosling, J.T., Hoeksema, J.T., McComas, D.J., Neugebauer, M., Sheeley, N.R., and Wang, Y.-M.: 1994, ‘Ulysses at 50°S: Constant Immersion in the High-speed Solar Wind’,Geophys. Res. L., in press.Google Scholar
  16. Schatten, K.H.: 1971, ‘Current Sheet Magnetic Model for the Solar Corona’,Cosmic Electrodynamics 2, 232.Google Scholar
  17. Schatten, K.H., Wilcox, J.M., and Ness, N.F.: 1969, ‘A Model of Interplanetary and Coronal Magnetic Fields’,Solar Phys 6, 442.Google Scholar
  18. Sheeley, N.R. Jr., Wang, Y.-M., and Phillips, J.L.,: 1994, ‘Near-Sun Magnetic Fields and the High-Latitude Solar Wind’,Space Sci. Rev., this volume.Google Scholar
  19. Sime, D.G., and McCabe, M.K.: 1990, ‘The Structure of the White-light Corona and the Large-scale Solar Magnetic Field’,Solar Phys 126, 267.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, E.J., Neugebauer, M., Balogh, A., Bame, S.J., Erdos, G., Forsyth, R.J., Goldstein, B.E., Phillips, J.L., and Tsurutani, B.T.: 1993, ‘Disappearance of the Heliospheric Sector Structure at Ulysses’,Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 2327.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, E.J., Tsurutani, B.T., and Rosenberg, R.L.: 1978, ‘Observations of the Interplanetary Sector Structure up to Heliographic Latitudes of 16°: Pioneer 11’,J. Geophys. Res. 83, 717.Google Scholar
  22. Suess, S.T., McComas, D.J. and Hoeksema, J.T.: 1993, ‘Prediction of Heliospheric Current Sheet Tilt: 1992–1996’,Geophys. Res. L. 20, 161.Google Scholar
  23. Svalgaard, L., Duvall, T.L. Jr., and Scherrer, P.H.: 1978, ‘The Strength of the Sun's Polar Fields’,Solar Phys 58, 225.Google Scholar
  24. Wang, Y.-M.: 1994, ‘Latitude and Solar-Cycle Dependence of Radial IMF Intensity’,Space Sci. Rev, this volume.Google Scholar
  25. Wang, Y.-M., and Sheeley, N.R. Jr.: 1990, ‘Magnetic Flux Transport and the Sunspot-Cycle Evolution of Coronal Holes and Their Wind Streams’,Astrophys. J. 365, 372.Google Scholar
  26. Wang, Y.-M., and Sheeley, N.R., Jr.: 1991, ‘Why Fast Solar Wind Originates from Slowly Expanding Coronal Flux Tubes’,Astrophys. J.,372, L45.Google Scholar
  27. Wang, Y.-M., and Sheeley, N.R. Jr.: 1992, ‘On Potential Field Models of the Solar Corona’,Astrophys. J. 392, 310.Google Scholar
  28. Wilcox, J.M., and Hundhausen, A.J.: 1983, ‘Comparison of Heliospheric Current Sheet Structure Obtained from Potential Magnetic Field Computations and from Observed Maximum Coronal Brightness’,J. Geophys. Res. 88, 8095.Google Scholar
  29. Wolfson, R.: 1985, ‘A Coronal Magnetic Field Model with Volume and Sheet Currents’,Astrophys. J. 288, 769.Google Scholar
  30. Zhao, X.P. and Hoeksema, J.T.: 1994a, ‘Prediction of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field Strength’,Space Sci. Rev, this volume.Google Scholar
  31. Zhao, X.P. and Hoeksema, J.T.: 1994b, ‘Prediction of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field’,J. Geophys. Res., submitted.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Todd Hoeksema
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Space Science and AstrophysicsStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations