Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 175, Issue 2, pp 97–108 | Cite as

The life cycle and growth ofIsoperla grammatica andI. difformis (Plecoptera) in southernmost Sweden: intra- and interspecific considerations

  • Björn Malmqvist
  • Per Sjöström
Article

Abstract

Studies on the life cycle and growth ofIsoperia grammatica andI. difformis from eight southern Swedish streams demonstrated that the former species shows greater between-stream differences than the latter species.I. grammatica larvae had typically two periods of rapid growth, autumn and spring, whileI. difformis larvae grew mainly in autumn-winter. In one of the streams, however,I grammatica grew rapidly throughout all winter. Maximum larval size differed between streams, and so did the timing of the first appearance of nymphs and nymphal maturation. Temperature was probably the most influential factor explaining all these differences. While sexual dimorphism inI. grammatica is slight but significant, it is very prominent inI. difformis. The sizes of larvae overlapped little between species as well as sexes suggesting that intra- and interspecific competition was, or had been, important. InI. grammatica this reduced overlap was expressed in several size-classes of males and females successively replacing each other, resulting in a meandering pattern of the size distribution charts. There were additional indications of possible interactions, such as a significant negative correlation between the densities of the two species.

Key words

Plecoptera Isoperla life cycles growth competition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allan, J. D., A. S. Flecker & N. L. McClintock, 1987. Prey size selection by carnivorous stoneflies. Limnol. Oceanogr. 32 (in press).Google Scholar
  2. Brinck, P., 1949. Studies on Swedish stoneflies. Opusc. Ent., Suppl. 11: 1–250.Google Scholar
  3. Grant, P. R. & R. J. Mackay, 1969. Ecological segregation of systematically related stream insects. Can. J. Zool. 47: 691–694.Google Scholar
  4. Harper, P. P., 1973. Emergence, reproduction, and growth of setipalpian Plecoptera in southern Ontario. Oikos 24: 94–107.Google Scholar
  5. Hawkins, C. P., 1986. Variation in individual growth rates and population densities of ephemerellid mayflies. Ecology 67: 1384–1395.Google Scholar
  6. Hynes, H. B. N., 1941. The taxonomy and ecology of the nymphs of British Plecoptera with notes on the adults and the eggs. Trans. R. Ent. Soc. London 91: 459–557.Google Scholar
  7. Hynes, H. B. N. & M. MacPhie, 1970. The maxillae of the British species ofIsoperla (Plecoptera: Perlodidae). Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A). 45: 123–124.Google Scholar
  8. Illies, J., 1978. Limnofauna Europaea. 2nd edition. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  9. Jop, K. & S. W. Szczytko, 1984. Life cycle and production ofIsoperla signata (Banks) in a Central Wisconsin trout stream. Aquat. Insects 6: 81–100.Google Scholar
  10. Malmqvist, B., 1978. Population structure and biometry ofLampetra planeri (Bloch) from three different watersheds in South Sweden. Arch. Hydrobiol. 84: 65–86.Google Scholar
  11. Malmqvist, B. & C. Otto, 1987. The influence of substrate stability on the composition of stream benthos: An experimental study. Oikos 48: 33–38.Google Scholar
  12. Malmqvist, B. & P. Sjöström, 1984. The microdistribution of some lotic predators in relation to their prey and to abiotic factors. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 649–656.Google Scholar
  13. Minshall, G. W. & J. N. Minshall, 1966. Notes on the life history and ecology ofIsoperla clio (Newman) andIsogenus decisus Walker (Plecoptera: Perlodidae). Am. Midl. Nat. 76: 340–350.Google Scholar
  14. Peckarsky, B. L. & M. A. Penton, 1985. Is predaceous stonefly behavior affected by competition. Ecology 66: 1718–1728.Google Scholar
  15. Schwarz, P., 1970. Autökologische Untersuchungen zum Lebenszyklus von Setipalpia-Arten (Plecoptera). Arch. Hydrobiol. 67: 103–140.Google Scholar
  16. Sheldon, A. L., 1972. Comparative ecology ofArcynopteryx andDiura (Plecoptera) in a California stream. Arch. Hydrobiol. 69: 521–546.Google Scholar
  17. Sheldon, A. L., 1980. Coexistence of perlid stoneflies (Plecoptera): predictions from multivariate morphometrics. Hydrobiologia 71: 99–105.Google Scholar
  18. Sjöström, P., 1983. Prey consumption by nymphs ofDinocras cephalotes (Perlidae). pp 7–19. PhD. Dissertation, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden. 67 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Sjöström, P., 1985. Territoriality in nymphs ofDinocras cephalotes (Plecoptera). Oikos 45: 353–357.Google Scholar
  20. Svensson, P. -O., 1966. Growth of nymphs of stream living stoneflies (Plecoptera) in northern Sweden. Oikos 17: 197–206.Google Scholar
  21. Sweeney, B. W. & R. L. Vannote, 1978. Size variation and the distribution of hemimetabolous aquatic insects: Two thermal equilibrium hypotheses. Science 200: 444–446.Google Scholar
  22. Townsend, C. R., A. G. Hildrew & J. Francis, 1983. Community structure in some southern English streams: the influence of physicochemical factors. Freshwat. Biol. 13: 521–544.Google Scholar
  23. Ulfstrand, S., 1968. Life cycles of benthic insects in Lapland streams (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Diptera Simuliidae). Oikos 19: 167–190.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Björn Malmqvist
    • 1
  • Per Sjöström
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Animal EcologyUniversity of LundLundSweden

Personalised recommendations