, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 7–15 | Cite as

Three measurement problems

  • Tim Maudlin


The aim of this essay is to distinguish and analyze several difficulties confronting attempts to reconcile the fundamental quantum mechanical dynamics with Born's rule. It is shown that many of the proposed accounts of measurement fail at least one of the problems. In particular, only collapse theories and hidden variables theories have a chance of succeeding, and, of the latter, the modal interpretations fail. Any real solution demands new physics.


Measurement Problem Bohmian Mechanic Hide Variable Theory Superselection Rule Modal Interpretation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albert, D. Z: 1992,Quantum Mechanics and Experience, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ballentine, L. E.: 1970, ‘The statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics’,Reviews of Modern Physics 42, 358–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, J. S.: 1987,Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, J. S.: 1990, ‘Against “measurement”’, in A. I. Miller (ed.),Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty, Plenum Publishing, pp. 17–31.Google Scholar
  5. Beltrametti, E. G. and Cassinelli, G.: 1981,The Logic of Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Bub, J.: 1989, ‘From micro to macro: a solution to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics’, in A. Fine and J. Leplin (eds.),PSA 1988, vol. 2, Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 151–9.Google Scholar
  7. Dürr, D., Goldstein, S. and Zhangi, N.: 1992, ‘Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty’,Journal of Statistical Physics 67, 843–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Everett, H.: 1957, ‘Relative state formulation of quantum mechanics’,Reviews of Modern Physics 29, 454–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feynman, R. P.: 1982, ‘Simulating physics with computers’,International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21, 467–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A. and Weber, T.: 1986, ‘Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic physics’,Physical Review D34, 470–91.Google Scholar
  11. Hepp, K.: 1972, ‘Quantum theory of measurement and macroscopic observables’,Helvetica Physica Acta 45, 237–48.Google Scholar
  12. Maudlin, T.: 1994, ‘The unbuttoned empiricist: van Fraassen speculates on the quantum world’,Philosophical Books 35, 94–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Perle, P.: 1990, ‘Toward a relativistic theory of statevector reduction’, in A. I. Miller (ed.),Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty, Plenum Publishing, pp. 193–214.Google Scholar
  14. Redhead, M.: 1987,Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  15. van Fraassen, B. C.: 1991,Quantum Mechanics: an Empiricist View. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. von Neumann, J.: 1955,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Trans. R. T. Beyer. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim Maudlin
    • 1
  1. 1.Rutgers UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations