Community Mental Health Journal

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 46–55 | Cite as

The least restrictive alternative: Hidden meanings and agendas

  • Robert D. Miller
Articles

Abstract

The concept of least restrictive alternative is used by professionals in legal, social, political, and clinical specialties, often without realizing that it may have very different meanings in these different contexts. The author examines these different meanings and argues that the various definitions and hidden meanins must be made overt if professionals in the various fields are to be able to work together to serve the best interests of patients.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramson M.F. The criminalization of mentally disordered behavior.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 1972,23, 101–105.Google Scholar
  2. Abroms G.M. Setting limits:Archives of General Psychiatry, 1968,19, 113–119.Google Scholar
  3. Ashbaugh J.W., & Bradley V.J. Linking deinstitutionalization of patients with hospital phasedown: The difference between success and failure.Hospital & Community Psychiatry 197930, 105–110.Google Scholar
  4. Aviram U., & Segal S.P. Exclusion of the mentally ill—reflection on an old problem in a new context.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1973,29, 126–131.Google Scholar
  5. Bachrach L.L. Deinstitutionalization of mental health services in rural areas.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 1977,28, 669–672.Google Scholar
  6. Bachrach L.L. Deinstitutionalization: An analytical review and sociological perspective. National Institutes of Mental Health, Series D #4, DHEW Publication # (ADM) 79-351, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, 1979.Google Scholar
  7. Bachrach L.L. The least restrictive environment is always the best? Sociological and semantic implications.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 1980,31, 97–103.Google Scholar
  8. Bachrach L.L. Concepts and issues in deinstitutionalization. In Barofsky I. Budson R.D. (Eds),The Chronic Psychiatric Patient in the Community: Principles of Treatment, New York, Spectrum Publications, in press.Google Scholar
  9. Bachrach L.L. Continuity of care for chronic mental patients: A conceptual analysis.American Journal of Psychiatry, in press.Google Scholar
  10. Becker A., & Schulberg H.C. Phasing out state hospitals—a psychiatric dilemma.New England Journal of Medicine, 1976,294, 255–261.Google Scholar
  11. Bentz W.K., & Edgerton J.W. Consensus on attitudes toward mental illness between leaders and the public in a rural community.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1970,22, 468–473.Google Scholar
  12. Bleicher B.K. Compulsory community care for the mentally ill.Cleveland-Marquette Law Review, 1967,16, 93–115.Google Scholar
  13. Bonovitz J.C., & Guy E.B. Impact of restrictive civil commitment procedures on a prison psychiatric service.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1979,136, 1045–1048.Google Scholar
  14. Caldwell M. The expanding role of the lawyer and the court in securing psychiatric treatment for patients confined pursuant to civil commitment procedures.Houston Law Review, 1969,6, 519–533.Google Scholar
  15. California Senate Report says state hospitals remain indispensible.Hospita' & Community Psychiatry, 1974,25, 489–492.Google Scholar
  16. Chase J. Where have all the patients gone?,Human Behavior, 1973,2, 10–18.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen F. The function of the attorney and the commitment of the mentally ill,Texas Law Review, 1966,44, 424–469.Google Scholar
  18. Covington v. Harris 410 F.2d 617, 623 (D.C. Cir. 1969).Google Scholar
  19. Cramer P. K. Report on the current state of deinstitutionalization: Period of retrenchment. Commentaries on Human Service Issues. Philadelphia, May 1978.Google Scholar
  20. Development in the Law: Civil commitment of the mentally ill.Harvard Law Review, 1974,87, 1191–1401.Google Scholar
  21. Dittmar N.D., & Franklin J.L. State hospital patients discharged to nursing homes: Are hospitals dumping their more difficult patients?Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 1980,31, 251–258.Google Scholar
  22. Fischer A., & Weinstein M.R. Mental hospitals, prestige, and the image of enlightenment.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 1971,25, 41–48.Google Scholar
  23. Fox R.P., & Potter D.N. Using inpatient staff for aftercare of severely disturbed chronic patients.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 1973,24, 482–484.Google Scholar
  24. Friedman H.J. Some problems of inpatient management with borderline patients.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1969,126, 299–304.Google Scholar
  25. Hersch C. Social history, mental health, and community control.American Psychologist, 1972,27, 749–754.Google Scholar
  26. Herz M.I. Views on the current role of psychiatric hospitalization.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 1972,23, 210–211.Google Scholar
  27. Herz M.I., Endicott J., & Spitzer R.L. Brief hospitalization: A two-year follow-up.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1977,135, 502–507.Google Scholar
  28. Johnson C.E. Due process in involuntary civil commitment and incompetency adjudication proceedings: Where does Colorado stand?Denver Law Journal, 1969,46, 516–578.Google Scholar
  29. Jones M. Community care for chronic mental patients: The need for a reassessment.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 1975,26, 94–98.Google Scholar
  30. Kirk S.A., & Therrien M.E. Community mental health myths and the fate of former hospitalized patients.Psychiatry, 1975,24, 209–217.Google Scholar
  31. Kubie L.S. The retreat from patients; an unanticipated penalty of the full-time system.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1971,24, 98–106.Google Scholar
  32. Lake v. Cameron 364 F.2d 657 (D.C. Cir. 1966).Google Scholar
  33. Lebensohn Z.M. Pilgrim's progress, or the tortuous road to mental health.Comprehensive Psychiatry, 1975,16, 415–426.Google Scholar
  34. Leeman C.P. Involuntary admissions to general hospitals: Progress or threat?Hospital & Community Psychiatry 1980,31, 315–318.Google Scholar
  35. Lessard v. Schmidt 349 F. Supp. 1078, 1972.Google Scholar
  36. Manasse G. Self-regard as a function of environmental demands in chronic schizophrenia.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1965,70, 310.Google Scholar
  37. Michaux M.H., Chelst M.R., Foster S.A., et al. Day and full-time psychiatric treatment: a controlled comparison.Current Therapy Research, 1972,14, 279–292.Google Scholar
  38. Miller R.D. The psychiatrist as public defender.Psychiatric Opinion, 1979,16, 34–36.Google Scholar
  39. Miller R.D. Beyond the old state hospital: new opportunities head.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 1981a,32, 27–31.Google Scholar
  40. Miller R.D. Psychiatric units in general hospitals — elitism revisited.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 1981b,32, 804–805.Google Scholar
  41. Miller R.D. Confidentiality or communication in the treatment of the mentally ill.Bulletin of American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 1981c9, 54–59.Google Scholar
  42. Miller R.D., & Fiddleman P.B. Outpatient commitment—a less restrictive alternative? Submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  43. Mosher L.R., Menn A.Z., & Matthews S. Soteria: Evaluation of home-based treatment for schizophrenia.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1975,45, 455–469.Google Scholar
  44. New York Civil Liberties Union. Objections to involuntary admission to mental hospitals.Psychoanalytic Review, 1971,58, 385–394.Google Scholar
  45. O'Connor v. Donaldson 95 Supreme Ct 2486 (1975).Google Scholar
  46. Peele R., Luisada P.V., Lucas M.J. et al., Asylums revisited.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1977,134 1077–1081.Google Scholar
  47. Perr I.N. The most beneficial alternative: a counterpoint to the least restrictive alternative.Bulletin American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 1978,6, iv-vii.Google Scholar
  48. Polak P.R., & Kirby M.W. A model to replace psychiatric hospitals.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1976,162, 13–22.Google Scholar
  49. Projects: Civil commitment of the mentally ill.UCLA Law Review 1967,14, 822–869.Google Scholar
  50. Pulice R.T., Dziokonski W. People vs. the mental health centers: Legal and administrative effects of community resistance. Presented at N. Council Comm. Mental Health Centers, annual meeting. April 22, 1981.Google Scholar
  51. Rachlin S.On the need for a closed ward in an open hospital: The psychiatric intensive-care unit.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 1973,24, 829–833.Google Scholar
  52. Rachlin S. With liberty and psychosis for all.Psychiatric Quarterly, 1974,48, 410–420.Google Scholar
  53. Reich R. Care of The chronically mentally ill—a national disgrace.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1973,130, 911–912.Google Scholar
  54. Reich R., & Siegel L. Psychiatry under siege: the chronically mentally ill shuffle to oblivion.Psychiatric Annals 1973,3, 35.Google Scholar
  55. Report of the President's Commission on Mental Health, U.S. Goverment Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1978.Google Scholar
  56. Rich R. Court screenings and patient advocacy. Presented as part of a panel at the N. Council Comm. Mental Health Centers, annual meeting, April 23, 1981.Google Scholar
  57. Rittenhouse J.D. Without hospitalization: An experimental study of psychiatric care in the home. Denver: Swallow Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  58. Rosen I.M. In further defense of the state hospital: Its rehabilitative function.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 1976,27, 820–821.Google Scholar
  59. Ryan J.H. Litigating the right to treatment: Wyatt v. Stickney.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 1974,25, 460–463.Google Scholar
  60. Shah S.A. Some interactions of law and mental health in the handling of social deviance.Catholic U Law Review, 1973,23, 674–719.Google Scholar
  61. Shelton v. Tucker 364 U.S. 479 (1960).Google Scholar
  62. Slovenko R., & Luby, E.D. On the emancipation of mental patients.Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 1975,3 Google Scholar
  63. Sosowsky, L. Exploring the increased arrest rate among mental patients: A cautionary note.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1980,137, 1602–1605.Google Scholar
  64. Spensley J., Edwards D.W., & White E. Patient satisfaction and involuntary treatment.American Journal of Orthopschychiatry, 1980,50, 725–727.Google Scholar
  65. Steadman H.F., Cocozza J.J., & Melich M.E. Explaining the increased arrest rate among mental patients: The changing clientele of state hospitals.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1978,135, 816–820.Google Scholar
  66. Stelovich S. From the hospital to the prison: A step forward in deinstitutionalization?Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 1979,30, 618–620.Google Scholar
  67. Szasz T.S.Law, Liberty and Psychiatry: An Inquiry into the Social Uses of Mental Health Practices, New York: MacMillian, 1963.Google Scholar
  68. Talbott J.A. Deinstitutionalization: Avoiding the disasters of the past.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 1979,30, 621–624.Google Scholar
  69. Test M.A., & Stein L.I. Community treatment of the chronic patient: Research overview.Schizophrenia Bulletin, 1978,4, 350–364.Google Scholar
  70. Toews J., El-Guebaly N., & Leckie A. Patients' reactions to their commitment.Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 1981,26, 251–254.Google Scholar
  71. Wilder J.F., Levin G. & Zwerling J. A two-year follow-up of acute psychotic patients treated in a day hospital.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1966,122, 1095–1101.Google Scholar
  72. Wyatt v. Stickney 325 F. Supp. 781 (MD Ala 1971).Google Scholar
  73. Zitrin A., Hardesty A.S., & Burdock E.T. Crime and violence among mental patients.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1976,133, 142–149.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert D. Miller
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.John Umstead HospitalButner
  2. 2.Duke University Medical CenterDurham

Personalised recommendations