Clinical Social Work Journal

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 375–383 | Cite as

Containing and the patient's observation of the therapist's countertransference

  • Laurence Green


Projective identification has received much attention for its ability to elucidate certain types of countertransference reactions. However, many severely disturbed patients are unable to benefit from the insight derived from interpretations based on projective identification. For many of these patients, the initial benefit of therapy is based on the containing provided by the therapist tolerating the countertransference rather than insight based on interpretation. Denis Carpy (1989) has written that the patient's observation of the therapist's tolerance of the countertransference helps to build psychic structure in the patient. In this article, the author reviews Carpy's position and then illustrates the value of the patient witnessing the therapist manage his countertransference using the case example of an adolescent in residential treatment.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bion, W.R. (1959). Attacks on linking.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 40: 308–315. Reprinted inSecond thoughts. London: Heinemann, 1967, pp. 93–109.Google Scholar
  2. Bion, W.R. (1962).Learning from experience. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  3. Brenman Pick, I. (1985). Working through in the countertransference.International Journal of Psychoanalysis. 66: 157–166.Google Scholar
  4. Carpy, D. (1989) Tolerating the countertransference: A mutative process.International Journal of Psychoanalysis. 70: 287–294.Google Scholar
  5. Freud, S. (1910). The future prospects of psychoanalytic therapy.Standard Edition. (11): 141–151). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  6. Freud, S. (1912). Recommendations for physicians on the psychoanalytic method of treatment.Standard Edition (12): 111–120). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  7. Grinberg, L. (1962). On a specific aspect of counter-transference due to the patient's projective identification.International Journal of Psychoanalysis. 43: 436–440.Google Scholar
  8. Heimann, P. (1950). On counter-transference.International Journey of Psychoanalysis. 31: 81–84.Google Scholar
  9. Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms.International Journey of Psychoanalysis., 27. Reprinted inThe writings of Melanie Klein 3. Hogarth, 1975. pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  10. Little, M. (1951). Counter-transference and the patient's response to it.International Journey of Psychoanalysis, 32:32–40.Google Scholar
  11. Malin, A. and Grotstein, J. (1966). Projective identification the therapeutic process.International Journey of Psychoanalysis, 47: 26–31.Google Scholar
  12. Ogden, T. (1979). On projective identification.International Journey of Psychoanalysis, 60: 357–73.Google Scholar
  13. Racker, H. (1953). A contribution to the problem of counter-transference.International Journey of Psychoanalysis, 34: 313–324.Google Scholar
  14. Racker, H. (1968). Transference and countertransference. New York: International University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Rosenfeld, H.A. (1971). Contribution to the psychopathology of psychotic states: The importance of projective identification in the ego structure and the object relations of the psychotic patient. InProblems of psychosis. ed. P. Doucet and C. Laurin. Amsterdam:Excerpta Medica pp. 115–128; republished (1988) in Bott Spillius, ed.Melanie Klein today: Development in theory and practice, Volume 1, Mainly Theory, pp. 239–255.Google Scholar
  16. Slatker, E. (1987).Countertransference. Northvale, New Jersey: Aronson.Google Scholar
  17. Winnicott, D.W. (1949) Hate in the counter-transference.International Journey of Psychoanalysis, 30: 69–74.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurence Green
    • 1
  1. 1.Los Angeles

Personalised recommendations