Clinical Social Work Journal

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 99–113 | Cite as

Ph.D. envy: A psychoanalytic case study (panel)

  • William A. Behr
Panels

Conclusion

I have tried to show how a patient who presented with debilitating anxiety around getting her Ph.D. and with concomitant feelings of envy for those with, and disdain for those without a Ph.D. has a psychical equivalent to what has been described in the literature as penis envy. Although the interpretation of penis envy was seen as a crucial part of the initial stages of the work together, the fact that it emerged from the outset as preconscious suggested that its understanding would have only limited value. Further I have tried to demonstrate how Freud's (1937) interpretation of penis envy and the patient's acceptance of the same as being “bedrock” is potentially harmful since it has the function of distorting the patient's psychic reality. Furthermore the importance of penis envy as a resistance to the exploration of a more primitive disturbance in the mother-daughter dyad is discussed. Further evidence for the understanding of this case in terms of a pre-Oedipal disturbance has to do with the patient's use of masochism with its anal-sadistic components and profound difficulties with eating. The understanding of penisenvy as a metaphor is emphasized and in particular its expression as an example of severe narcissistic injury has been a way of understanding this patient's own sense of maternal deprivation. References were also made to the patient's relationship to the penis as being a metaphor for the same conflicts toward the maternal breast, trapped between the desire to be loved and the wish to destroy the one who stands in her way.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bergmann, M. (1971). Psychoanalytic observations on the capacity to love.Separation-Individuation: Essays in honor of Margaret S. Mahler, International Universities Press: New York (J.P. McDevitt, C.G. Settlage eds.)Google Scholar
  2. Brenner, C. (1959). The masochistic character: Genesis and treatment.Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 7:197–226.Google Scholar
  3. Fairbairn, W.R.D. (1964). A note on the origin of male homosexuality.British Journal of Medical Psychology 37:31–32.Google Scholar
  4. Fenichel, O. (1945).The psychoanalytic theory of neurosis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  5. Freud, S. (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexuality.Standard Edition 7:125–244. London: Hogarth Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  6. Freud, S. (1924). The economic problem of masochism.Standard Edition 19:159–170. London: Hogarth Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  7. Freud, S. (1937). Analysis terminable and interminable.Standard Edition 23:216–253. London: Hogarth Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  8. Glover, E. (1931). The therapeutic effect of inexact interpretation.International Journal of Psychoanalysis 12:347–411.Google Scholar
  9. Greenacre, P. (1953). Penis awe and its relation to penis envy.Emotional Growth: Psychoanalytic Studies of the Gifted and a Great Variety of Other Individuals, vol. 1, International Universities Press. New York, 1971, pp. 31–49.Google Scholar
  10. Grossman, William I. and Stewart, Walter A. (1976). Penis envy: From childhood wish to development metaphor.Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, (Supplement) vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 193–212.Google Scholar
  11. Grunberger, B. (1956). Psychodynamic theory of masochism,Perversions-psychodynamics and therapy, (S. Lorand and M. Balint eds.) New York: Gramercy Books.Google Scholar
  12. Loewenstein, Rudolph (1957). Some thoughts on interpretation in the theory and practice of psychoanalysis.Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, Volume 12, p. 145.Google Scholar
  13. Meyers, H. (1987).Current concepts in masochism. New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • William A. Behr
    • 1
  1. 1.New York

Personalised recommendations