Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 10, Issue 11, pp 1959–1970 | Cite as

The annealing of solution-crystallized polyethylene mats: an X-ray diffraction study

  • A. H. Windle
Papers

Abstract

Both low- and wide-angle X-ray diffraction measurements have been made on solution-crystallized mats of high density polyethylene which have been annealed for different periods at 125° C. The low-angle data, in addition to showing the rapid increase in both long period and density defect at each fold surface for the first stages of annealing, also indicate that after annealing for times in excess of 105 sec the density defect is reduced and approaches the value for the unannealed crystal. The wide-angle X-ray studies have centred around the Fourier analysis of the 0 0 2 diffraction peak. The results of this type of measurement on unannealed mats have already been reported [20]. In extending the work to annealed material evidence has been obtained for preferred chain stem lengths which are multiples of the unannealed length. The combination of these observations with the low-angle results has led to the formulation of a model for crystal thickening which invokes the unlooping mechanism proposed by Dreyfuss and Keller [15], but also envisages thickening occurring preferentially from one fold surface to give an asymmetric crystal profile in the [0 0 1] direction.

Keywords

Polyethylene High Density Polyethylene Density Defect Diffraction Measurement Stem Length 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Keller,Phil. Mag. 2 (1957) 1171.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. W. Fischer,Z. Naturforsche 12a (1957) 753.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Keller andA. O'Conner,Discuss. Faraday Soc. 25 (1958) 114.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. O. Statton,J. Appl. Phys. 32 (1961) 2332.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. J. Balta Calleja, D. C. Bassett andA. Keller,Polymer 4 (1963) 269.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. O. Statton andP. H. Geil,J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 3 (1960) 357.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Nagai andN. Kajikawawa,Polymer 9 (1968) 177.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ryong-Joon Roe, C. Gieniewski andR. G. Vadimski,J. Polymer Sci. 11 (1973) 1653.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. M. Sinnott,J. Appl. Phys. 37 (1966) 3385.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. N. Lowell andN. G. Mccrum,Polymer Letters 5 (1967) 1145.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. Mandelkern andA. L. Allan,J. Polymer Sci. 134 (1966) 447.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. E. Bair, R. Salovey andT. W. Huseby,Polymer 8 (1967) 9.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. H. Reneker,J. Polymer Sci. 59 (1962) 39.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Peterlin,Polymer 6 (1965) 25.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. Dreyfuss andA. Keller,Polymer Letters 8 (1970) 253.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. W. Fischer andG. F. Schmidt,Angew Chem. 74 (1962) 551.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. A. Blackadder andP. A. Lewell,Polymer 11 (1970) 147.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    W. O. Statton, in “Newer Methods of Polymer Characterisation”, edited by B. Ke (Interscience, New York, 1964) Ch. 6.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Y. Kobayashi andA. Keller,J. Mater. Sci. 9 (1974) 2056.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. H. Windle,J. Mater. Sci. 10 (1975) 252.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    G. R. Strobl,J. Appl. Cryst. 6 (1973) 365.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. R. Strobl andN. Müller,J. Polymer Sci. 11 (1973) 1219.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. R. Stokes,Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) A61 (1948) 382.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    B. E. Warren andB. L. Averbach,J. Appl. Phys. 21 (1950) 595.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd. 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. H. Windle
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Metallurgy and Materials ScienceImperial College of Science and TechnologyLondonUK

Personalised recommendations