Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 269–282 | Cite as

Detection of antimycin-binding subunits of Complex III by photoaffinity-labeling with an azido derivative of antimycin

  • Samuel H. K. Ho
  • Uttam Das Gupta
  • John S. Rieske
Research Articles

Abstract

Deformamidoazidoantimycin A (DAA), a photoactive derivative of antimycin A containing an azido group substituting for the formamido group attached to the phenyl ring, was synthesized. The ultraviolet spectrum of DAA was almost identical to that of antimycin A, indicating little alteration of the electronic structure of the substituted phenyl ring by the azido substitution. However, the inhibitory effectiveness of DAA toward ubiquinol-cytochromec reductase (Complex III) purified from bovine heart (K i =ca. 0.5 µM) was considerably less than that of antimycin (K i ≤3 pM), indicating a direct rather than a supporting role of the formamido group in the inhibitory activity of antimycin. Exposure of purified Complex III to [3H]DAA plus ultraviolet light caused a major labeling by tritium of SDS-PAGE band 7 (m=13 kDa by SDS-PAGE) and lesser but significant labeling of bands 3, 6, 8, and 9. Pretreatment of Complex III with antimycin greatly suppressed the labeling of bands 5, 6, and 7 but caused an apparent increased labeling of bands 8 and 9 by [3H]DAA, respectively. The labeling of band 7 by [3H]DAA also was strongly suppressed by reduction of Complex III by either sodium borohybride or ascorbate. Based on magnitude of labeling by [3H]DAA and the degree of suppression of labeling by antimycin, the protein of band 7 qualified as the principal component for specific binding of antimycin with the protein of band 6 (m=16 kDa) showing a lesser but significant amount of specific binding.

Key Words

Ubiquinol-cytochromec reductase Complex III subunits polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis antimycin-binding site photoaffinity labeling deformamidoazidoantimycin A 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baum, H., Silman, H. I., Rieske, J. S., and Lipton, S. H. (1967).J. Biol. Chem. 242, 4876–4887.Google Scholar
  2. Berden, J. A., and Slater, E. C. (1972).Biochim. Biophys. Acta 256, 199–215.Google Scholar
  3. Blakesley, R. W., and Boezi, J. A. (1977).Anal. Biochem. 82, 580–582.Google Scholar
  4. Capaldi, R. A., Bell, R. L., and Branchek, T. (1977).Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 74, 425–433.Google Scholar
  5. Das Gupta, U., and Rieske, J. S. (1973).Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 54, 1247–1254.Google Scholar
  6. Furthmayr, H., and Timpl, R. (1971).Anal. Biochem. 41, 510–516.Google Scholar
  7. Gornall, A. G., Bardawill, C. J., and David, M. M. (1948).J. Biol. Chem. 177, 751–766.Google Scholar
  8. Gurst, J. E. (1971). InThe Chemistry of the Azido Group (Patai, S., ed.), Interscience Publishers, New York, pp. 191–202.Google Scholar
  9. Ho, S. H. K. (1979). Ph.D. Thesis, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  10. Ho, S. H. K., Das Gupta, U., and Rieske, J. S. (1982).Fed. Proc. 41, Abst. 3650.Google Scholar
  11. Markwell, M. A., Hass, S. M., Bieber, L. L., and Tolbert, N. E. (1978).Anal. Biochem. 87, 206–210.Google Scholar
  12. Marres, C. A., and Slater, E. C. (1977).Biochim. Biophys. Acta 462, 531–548.Google Scholar
  13. Nalecz, M. J., Casey, R. P., and Azzi, A. (1983).Biochim. Biophys. Acta 724, 75–82.Google Scholar
  14. Neft, N., and Farley, T. M. (1971).J. Med. Chem. 14, 1169–1170.Google Scholar
  15. Rieske, J. S. (1967). InMethods in Enzymology (Colowick, S. P., and Kaplan, N. O., eds.), Academic Press, New York, Vol. 10, pp. 239–245.Google Scholar
  16. Rieske, J. S. (1980).Pharmacol. Ther. 11, 415–450.Google Scholar
  17. Rieske, J. S., Zaugg, W. S., and Hansen, R. E. (1964).J. Biol. Chem. 239, 3023–3030.Google Scholar
  18. Rieske, J. S., Baum, H., Stoner, C. D., and Lipton, S. H. (1967).J. Biol. Chem. 242, 4854–4866.Google Scholar
  19. Rieske, J. S., Ramesh, V., and Tripathy, B. C. (1984). InBiomedical and Clinical Aspects of Coenzyme Q (Folkers, K., and Yamamura, Y., eds.), Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, Vol. 4, pp. 99–108.Google Scholar
  20. Rodbard, D., and Chrambach, A. (1971).Anal. Biochem. 40, 95–134.Google Scholar
  21. Schägger, H., and von Jagow, G. (1983).Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem. 364, 307–311.Google Scholar
  22. Schilling, G., Berti, D., and Kluepfel, D. (1970).J. Antibiot. 23, 81–90.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, P. S. A., Hall, J. H., and Kan, R. O. (1962).J. Am. Chem. Soc. 84, 485–489.Google Scholar
  24. Van Tamelen, E. E., Dickie, J. P., Loomans, M. E., Dewey, R. S., and Strong, F. M. (1961).J. Am. Chem. Soc. 83, 1639–1646.Google Scholar
  25. Wakabayashi, S., Takeda, H., Matsubara, H., Kim, C. H., and King, T. E. (1982).J. Biochem. 91, 2077–2085.Google Scholar
  26. Weber, K., and Osborn, M. (1969).J. Biol. Chem. 244, 4406–4412.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel H. K. Ho
    • 1
  • Uttam Das Gupta
    • 1
  • John S. Rieske
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physiological Chemistry, College of MedicineThe Ohio State UniversityColumbus

Personalised recommendations