Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 28, Issue 1–4, pp 17–31 | Cite as

Underwater observations of piranhas in western Brazil

  • Ivan Sazima
  • Francisco A. Machado
Article

Synopsis

The behaviour of three piranha species,Serrasalmus marginatus, S. spilopleura, andPygocentrus nattereri, and their prey fishes was studied underwater in the Pantanal region, Mato Grosso, Brazil. General habits, predatory tactics, feeding behaviour, and social interactions while foraging, as well as defensive tactics of prey fishes were observed.S. marginatus is solitary whereas the other two species live in shoals; their agonistic behaviour varies accordingly, the simplest being displayed by the solitary species. Predatory tactics and feeding behaviour also vary:S. spilopleura shows the most varied diet and highly opportunistic feeding strategy, which includes aggressive mimicry. The solitaryS. marginatus, besides fin and scale-eating, occasionally cleans larger individuals ofP. nattereri. Several cichlid species display defensive tactics clearly related to piranha attacks: tail protecting, watching, and confronting the predator are the most commonly observed behaviours. Piranhas seem to strongly influence use of habitat, social structure, and foraging mode of the fish communities.

Key words

Characiformes Serrasalmus Pygocentrus Predatory tactics Fin and scale-eating Cleaning Social interactions Prey fish Cichlidae Anti-predatory behaviour 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Brockmann, H.J. & J.P. Jailman. 1976. Fish cleaning symbiosis: notes on juvenile angelfishes (Pomacanthus, Chaetodontidae) and comparisons with other species. Z. Tierpsychol. 42: 129–138.Google Scholar
  2. Chinery, M. 1979. Killers of the wild. Salamander Books Ltd., London. 224 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Curio, E. 1976. The ethology of predation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 249 pp.Google Scholar
  4. DeMartini, E.E. & J.A. Coyer. 1981. Cleaning and scale-eating in juveniles of the kyphosid fishes,Hermosilla azurea andGirella nigricans. Copeia 1981: 785–789.Google Scholar
  5. Dozier, T.A. 1976. Dangerous sea creatures. Time-Life Films, Inc. and Vineyard Books, Inc. (no place). 128 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Edmunds, M. 1974. Defence in animals: a survey of anti-predator defences. Longman, Harlow. 357 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Ehrlich, P.R. 1975. The population biology of coral reef fishes. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Systemat. 6: 211–247.Google Scholar
  8. Endler, J.A. 1986. Defense against predators. pp. 109–134.In: M.E. Feder & G.V. Lauder (ed.) Predator-Prey Relationships: Perspectives and Approaches From the Study of Lower Vertebrates, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  9. Fink, W.L. 1988. Evolutionary biology of piranhas. pp. 13–14.In: G.H. Dalrymple, W.F. Loftus & F.S. Bernardino, Jr. (ed.) Wildlife in the Everglades and Latin America wetlands, Proc. 1st. Everglades Nat. Park Symp., Fl. Int. Univ., Miami.Google Scholar
  10. Foxx, R.M. 1972. Attack preferences of the red-bellied piranha (Serrasalmus nattereri). Anim. Behav. 20: 280–283.Google Scholar
  11. Goldman, B. & F.H. Talbot. 1976. Aspects of the ecology of reef fishes. pp. 125–154.In: O.A. Jones & R. Endean (ed.) Biology and Geology of Coral Reefs, vol. 3, Biology 2, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Gorlick, D.L., P.D. Atkin & G.S. Losey, Jr. 1978. Cleaning stations was water holes, garbage dumps, and sites for the evolution of reciprocal altruism? Amer. Natur. 112: 341–353.Google Scholar
  13. Goulding, M. 1980. The fishes and the forest: explorations in Amazonian natural history. University of California Press, Berkeley. 280 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Helfman, G.S. 1981. Twilight activities and temporal structure in a freshwater fish community. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38: 1405–1420.Google Scholar
  15. Helfman, G.S. 1986. Behavioral responses of prey fish during predator-prey interactions. 135–156.In: M.E. Feder & G.V. Lauder (ed.) Predator-Prey Relationships: Perspectives and Approaches from the Study of Lower Vertebrates, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. Hobson, E.S. 1971. Cleaning symbiosis among California inshore fishes. U.S. Fish. Bull. 69: 491–523.Google Scholar
  17. Keenleyside, M.H.A. 1979. Diversity and adaptation in fish behaviour. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 208 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Lehner, P.N. 1979. Handbook of ethological methods. Garland STPM Press, New York. 403 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Leviton, A.E., R.H. Gibbs, Jr., E. Heal & C.E. Dawson. 1985. Standards in herpetology and ichthyology: Part I. Standard symbolic codes for institutional resource collections in herpetology and ichthyology. Copeia 1985: 802–832.Google Scholar
  20. Losey, G.S., Jr. 1971. Communication between fishes in cleaning symbiosis. pp. 45–76.In: T.C. Cheng (ed.) Aspects of the Biology of Symbiosis, University Park Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  21. Losey G.S., Jr. 1978. The symbiotic behavior of fishes. pp. 1–31.In: D.I. Mostofsky (ed.) The Behavior of Fish and Other Aquatic Animals, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Lucas, J.R. & K.A. Benkert. 1983. Variable foraging and cleaning behavior by juvenile leatherjackets,Oligoplites saurus (Carangidae). Estuaries 6: 247–250.Google Scholar
  23. Machado-Allison, A. & C. Garcia. 1986. Food habits and morphological changes during ontogeny in three serrasalmine fish species of the Venezuelan floodplains. Copeia 1986: 193–196.Google Scholar
  24. Malta, J.C.O. 1982. The argulids (Crustacea: Branchiura) from the Brazilian Amazon. Aspects of ecology ofDolops discoidalis Bouvier, 1899 andDolops bidentata Bouvier, 1 Acta Amazonica 12: 521–528. (In Portuguese).Google Scholar
  25. Markl, H. 1972. Aggression und Beuteverhalten bei Piranhas (Serrasalminae, Characidae). Z. Tierpsychol. 30: 190–216.Google Scholar
  26. Menezes, N.A. 1988. Aquatic life in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil, with special reference to fishes. p. 12.In: G.H. Darlymple, W.F. Loftus & F.S. Bernardino, Jr. (ed.) Wildlife in the Everglades and Latin American Wetlands, Proc. 1st. Everglades Nat. Park Symp., Fl. Int. Univ., Miami.Google Scholar
  27. McKaye, K.R. 1977. Competition for breeding sites between the cichlid fishes of Lake Jiloā, Nicaragua. Ecology 58: 291–302.Google Scholar
  28. Migdalsky, E.C. & G.S. Fichter. 1976. The fresh and saltwater fishes of the world. Greenwich House, New York. 315 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Myers, G.S. (ed.) 1972. The piranha book. T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City, 128 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Nico, L.G. & D.C. Taphorn. 1986. Those bitin' fish from South America. Trop. Fish. Hobb. 34: 24–27, 30–34, 36, 40–41, 56–57.Google Scholar
  31. Nico, L.G. & D.C. Taphorn. 1988. Food habits of piranhas in the low llanos of Venezuela. Biotropic 20: 311–321.Google Scholar
  32. Northcote, T.G., M.S. Archifa & O. Froehlich. 1987. Fin-feeding by the piranha (Serrasalmus spilopleura Kner): the cropping of a novel renewable resource. Proc. 5th Congr. Europ. Ichthyol., Stockholm 1985: 133–143.Google Scholar
  33. Northcote, T.G., R.G. Northcote & M.S. Arcifa. 1986. Differential cropping of the caudal fin lobes of prey fishes by the piranha,Serrasalmus spilopleura Kner. Hydrobiologia 141: 199–205.Google Scholar
  34. Pitcher, T.J. 1986. Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. pp. 294–337.In: T.J. Pitcher (ed.) The Behaviour of Teleost Fishes, Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  35. POtts, G.W. 1983. The predatory tactics ofCaranx melampygus and the response of its prey. pp. 181–191.In: D.L.G. Noakes, D.G. Lindquist, G.S. Helfman & J.A. Ward (ed.) Predators and Prey in Fishes, Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar
  36. Prance, G.T. & G.B. Schaller. 1982. Preliminary study of some vegetation types of the Pantanal, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Britonia 34: 228–251.Google Scholar
  37. Ribbink, A.J. 1984. The feeding behaviour of a cleaner and scale, skin and fin eater from Lake Malawi (Docimodus evelynae; Pisces, Cichlidae). Neth. J. Zool. 34: 182–196.Google Scholar
  38. Ribbink, A.J., B.A. Marsh, A.C. Marsh, A.C. Ribbink & B.J. Sharp. 1983. A preliminary survey of the cichlid fishes of rocky habitats in Lake Malawi. S. Afr. J. Zool. 18: 149–310.Google Scholar
  39. Ringler, N.H. 1983. Variation in foraging tactics of fishes. pp. 159–171.In: D.L.G. Noakes, D.G. Lindquist, G.S. Helfman & J.A. Ward (ed.) Predators and Prey in Fishes, Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar
  40. Sale, P.E. 1980. The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 18: 367–421.Google Scholar
  41. Sazima, I. 1983. Scale-eating in characoids and other fishes. Env. Biol. Fish. 9: 87–101.Google Scholar
  42. Sazima, I. 1986. Similarities in feeding behaviour between some marine and freshwater fishes in two tropical communities. J. Fish Biol. 29: 53–65.Google Scholar
  43. Sazima, I. 1988. Territorial behaviour in a scale-eating and a herbivorous neotropical characiform fish. Revta. bras. Biol. 48: 189–194.Google Scholar
  44. Sazima, I. & S.A. Guimarāes. 1987. Scavenging on human corpses as a source for stories about man-eating piranhas. Env. Biol. Fish. 20: 75–77.Google Scholar
  45. Sazima, I. & J.P. Pombal, Jr. 1988. Fin-clipping by the piranha,Serrasalmus spilopleura, on the Brazilian eartheater,Geophagus brasiliensis. Revta. bras. Biol. 48: 477–483. (In Portuguese).Google Scholar
  46. Sazima, I. & C. Zamprogno. 1985. Use of water hyacinths as shelter, foraging place, and transport by young piranhasmSerrasalmus spilopleura. Env. Biol. Fish. 12: 237–240.Google Scholar
  47. Schaller, G.B. & P.G. Crawshaw, Jr. 1982. Fishing behavior of Paraguayan caiman (Caiman crocodilus). Copeia 1982: 66–72.Google Scholar
  48. Shellis, R.P. & B.K.B. Berkowitz. 1976. Observations on the dental anatomy of piranhas (Characidae) with special reference to tooth structure. J. Zool., Lond. 180: 69–84.Google Scholar
  49. Sire, J. 1982. Régénération des écailles d' un cichlidé,Hemichromis bimaculatus (Gill) (Téléostéen, Perciforme). I. Morphogenèse, structure et minéralisation. Ann. Scien. Natur. Zool. 4: 153–169.Google Scholar
  50. Suckdorff, A. 1985. Pantanal, a lost paradise? Ed. Rio Gráfica & Ed. Siciliano, Rio de Janeiro. 160 pp. (In Portuguese).Google Scholar
  51. Sulak, K.J. 1975. Cleaning behaviour in the centrarchid fishesLepomis macrochirus andMicropterus salmoides. Anim. Behav. 23: 331–334.Google Scholar
  52. Winemiller, K.O. 1989a. Ontogenetic diet shifts and resource partitioning among piscivorous fishes in the Venezuelan llanos. Env. Biol. Fish. 26: 177–199.Google Scholar
  53. Winemiller, K.O. 1989b. Caudal eyespots as deterrents against fin predation in the Neotropical cichlidAstronotus ocellatus. Copeia. (in press).Google Scholar
  54. Zbinden, K. 1973. Verhaltensstudien anSerrasalmus nattereri. Rev. Suisse Zool. 80: 521–542.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivan Sazima
    • 1
  • Francisco A. Machado
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de ZoologiaUniversidade Estadual de CampinasCampinasBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de BiologiaUniversidade Federal de Mato GrossoCuiabáBrazil

Personalised recommendations