Advertisement

Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

, Volume 3, Issue 3–4, pp 225–228 | Cite as

Collaborative writing and technological change: Implications for writing practice and system design

  • Mike Sharples
  • Bertram C. Bruce
Article

Keywords

System Design Technological Change Collaborative Writing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bruce, B. C. (in press): Current Issues and Future Directions. In J. Flood, S. B. Heath, & D. Lapp (eds.),A handbook for literacy educators: Research on teaching the communicative and visual arts. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  2. Burbules, N. C., and Bruce, B. C. (1995): This is not a paper.Educational Researcher. Available on the World Wide Web [http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/coe/eps/papers/paper.1.html/].Google Scholar
  3. Chandler, D. (1994): Who Needs Suspended Inscription?Computers and Composition, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 191–201.Google Scholar
  4. Flower, L. S. (1981):Problem-solving Strategies for Writing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  5. Flower, L. S., and Hayes, J. R. (1981): A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing.College Composition and Communication, vol. 32, pp. 365–387.Google Scholar
  6. Haas, C. (1995):Writing Technology: Studies on the Materiality of Literacy. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  7. Hartman, K., Neuwirth, C. M., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., Cochran, C., Palmquist, M., and Zubrow, D. (1991): Patterns of Social Interaction and Learning to Write: Some Effects of Network Technologies.Written Communication, vol. 8, pp. 79–113.Google Scholar
  8. Hawisher, G. E. and Sullivan, P. (in press): Women on the Networks: Searching for e-spaces of Their Own. In S. Jarratt and L. Worsham (eds.),Feminism and Composition. New York: Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
  9. Kramarae, C. and Kramer, J. (1995, February): Net Gains, Net Losses.Women's Review of Books, pp. 33–35.Google Scholar
  10. Miller, J. D. (1993): Script Writing on a Computer Network: Quenching the Flames or Feeding the Fire. In B. Bruce, J. K. Peyton and T. Batson (eds.),Network-based Classrooms: Promises and Realities. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 124–137.Google Scholar
  11. Sharples, M. and van der Geest, T. (eds.) (in press):The New Writing Environment: Writers at Work in a World of Technology. London: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Van Waes, L. (1992): The Influence of the Computer on Writing Profiles. In H. P. Maat and M. Steehouder (eds.)Studies of Functional Text Quality. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi.Google Scholar
  13. Zuboff, S. (1988):In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. Oxford: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mike Sharples
    • 1
  • Bertram C. Bruce
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Cognitive and Computing SciencesUniversity of SussexBrighton
  2. 2.College of Education, MC 708University of IllinoisChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations