Zur Histo- und Cytotopik der unspezifischen alkalischen Phosphatase

Enzymhistochemische Untersuchung an der Placenta und ihren Zellfraktionen
  • G. Strauss
  • G. Stark
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Barter, R.: Diffusion of alkaline phosphatase to characteristic intracytoplasmatic sites of activity. Nature (Lond.)173, 1233–1234 (1954).Google Scholar
  2. Bélanger, L. F.: Zit. nachGoebel u.Puchtler, Zbl. allg. Path. path. Anat.92, 159–171 (1954)Google Scholar
  3. Berenbom, M., H. O. Yokoyama andR. E. Stowell: Chemical and enzymatic-changes in liver following freezing-drying and acetone fixation. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N. Y.)81, 125–128 (1952).Google Scholar
  4. Berg, N. O.: A histological study of masked lipids Stainability, distribution and functional variations. Acta path. microbiol. scand. Suppl.90 (1951).Google Scholar
  5. Bodansky, M.: Zit. nachThomsen, Arch. Gynäk.187, 1–19 (1955).Google Scholar
  6. Burstone, M. S.: The relationship between fixation and techniques for the histochemical localisation of hydrolytic enzymes. J. Histochem. Cytochem.6, 322–339 (1958).Google Scholar
  7. Cleland, K. W.: A study of the alkaline phosphatase reaction in tissue sections. Part. II. The histological and cytological validity. Proc. Linnean Soc. N. S. Wales75, 54–69 (1950).Google Scholar
  8. Coons, A. H., E. H. Leduc, andM. H. Kaplan: Localization of antigen in tissue cells. VI. The fate of ingested foreign proteins in the mouse. J. exp. Med.93, 173–188 (1951).Google Scholar
  9. Danielli, J. T.: A critical study of techniques for determining the cytological position of alkaline phosphatase. J. exp. Biol.22, 110–117 (1946).Google Scholar
  10. Dempsey, E. W., andG. B. Wislocki: Histochemical reactions associated with basophilia and acidophilia in the placenta and pituitary gland. Amer. J. Anat.76, 277–301 (1945).Google Scholar
  11. Dempsey, E. W., andG. B. Wislocki: Further observations on the Distribution of phosphatases in Mammalian placentas. Amer. J. Anat.80, 1–22 (1947).Google Scholar
  12. Doyle, W. L.: Some properties of phosphatases in the salivary glands of Drosophila. Anat. Rec.99, 633–634 (1947).Google Scholar
  13. Eger, W., u.H. F. Geller: Zum Nachweis der alkalischen und sauren Phosphatase in der Leber am nativen Gefrierschnitt. Virchows Arch. path. Anat.322, 645–661 (1952).Google Scholar
  14. Eger, W., M. Gottesleben u.M. Tietjen: Über das Verhalten der alkalischen und sauren Phosphatase bei funktioneller Belastung der Nebenniere. Virchows Arch. path. Anat.324, 173–192 (1953).Google Scholar
  15. Emery, A. J., andA. L. Dounce: Intrazellular distribution of alkaline phosphatase in rat liver cells. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol.1, 315–330 (1955).Google Scholar
  16. Emery, A. J., andA. L. Dounce: Studies of two types of alcaline Phosphatase in nuclei isolated from the livers of fed and fasted rats by a modification of the Behrens technique. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol.1, 331–338 (1955).Google Scholar
  17. Feigin, J., andA. Wolf: Artifacts in the histochemical localisation of alkaline Phosphatase and other enzymes. J. Neuropath. exp. Neurol.12, 93 (1953).Google Scholar
  18. Feigin, J., andA. Wolf: Artifactual nuclear staining in the Gomori method for demonstrating alkaline Phosphatase; differing mechanism with Cobalt and Silver visualization technics. Lab. Invest.2, 115–123 (1953).Google Scholar
  19. Feigin, J., andA. Wolf: The effect of Mg on nuclear staining in the Gomori method for localizing alkaline phosphatase activity. Proc. Histochem. Soc. 1954. Ref. J. Histochem. Cytochem.2, 434–484 (1954).Google Scholar
  20. Feigin, J., A. Wolf andE. A. Kabat: Histochemical studies on tissue enzymes. VI. A difficulty in the histochemical localisation of alkaline phosphatase in nuclei. Amer. J. Path.26, 647–659 (1950).Google Scholar
  21. Feyrter, F.: Über die Pathologie der vegetativen nervösen Peripherie und der ganglionären Reaktionsstätten, S. 183–185. Wien: Wilhelm Maudrich 1951.Google Scholar
  22. Firket, H., etJ. P. Michel: Suppression par l'emploi du freezing-drying de la diffusion et de l'adsorption sur les noyaux dans la mise en evidence de la phosphatase alcaline. Bull. Micr. appl., II. s.4, 1–5 (1954).Google Scholar
  23. Fiske, C. H., andY. Subarrow: The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. J. biol. Chem.66, 375–400 (1925).Google Scholar
  24. Gedigk, P.: Diskussionsbemerkung zum VortragM. Eder: Histochemische Fermentnachweise. Ihre Bedeutung in der Pathologie. Verh. dtsch. Ges. Path.42, 374–394 (1959).Google Scholar
  25. Gedigk, P., u.R. Fischer: Über die Entstehung von Lipopigmenten in Muskelfasern. Untersuchungen beim experimentellen Vitamin-E-Mangel der Ratte und an Organen des Menschen. Virchows Arch. path. Anat.332, 431–468 (1959).Google Scholar
  26. Goebel, A., u.H. Puchtler: Untersuchungen zur Methodik des histochemischen Nachweises der alkalisehen Phosphatase. Zbl. allg. Path. path. Anat.92, 159–171 (1954).Google Scholar
  27. Gössner, W.: Histochemischer Nachweis hydrolytischer Enzyme mit Hilfe der Azofarbstoffmethode. Untersuchungen zur Methodik und vergleichenden Histotopik der Esterasen und Phosphatasen bei Wirbeltieren. Histochemie1, 48–96 (1958).Google Scholar
  28. Goetsch, J. B., P. M. Reynolds andH. Bunting: Modification of Gomori method for alkaline and acid phosphatase avoiding artefact staining of nucleus. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.)80, 71–75 (1952).Google Scholar
  29. Gomori, G.: Microtechnical demonstration of Phosphatase in tissue sections. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.)42, 23–26 (1939).Google Scholar
  30. Gomori, G.: Histochemical specifity of phosphatases. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.)70, 7–11 (1949).Google Scholar
  31. Gomori, G.: Sources of error in encymatic histochemistry. J. Lab. clin. Med.35, 802–809 (1950).Google Scholar
  32. Gomori, G.: Microscopic histochemistry. Chicago, Ill.: Chicago University Press 1952.Google Scholar
  33. Gomori, G., andE. P. Benditt: Precipitation of Calcium-Phosphate in the histochemical method for Phosphatase. J. Histochem. Cytochem.1, 114–122 (1953).Google Scholar
  34. Gomori, G.: Histochemistry of human esterases. J. Histochem. Cytochem.3, 479–484 (1955).Google Scholar
  35. Hess, R.: Die histochemische Analyse enzymatischer Vorgänge im Nierentubulus. In: Diurese und Diuretica, S. 121–136. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1959.Google Scholar
  36. Hörmann: Ein Beitrag zur funktionellen Morphologie der menschlichen Placenta. Arch. Gynäk.184, 109–123 (1953/54).Google Scholar
  37. Holtfreter, J.: Observations on the physio-chemical properties of isolated nuclei. Exp. Cell. Res.7, 95–102 (1954).Google Scholar
  38. Jakoby, F., andB. F. Martin: The histochemical test for alkaline phosphatase. Nature (Lond.)163, 875–876 (1949).Google Scholar
  39. Johansen, G., andK. Linderstrøm-Lang: Liberation, diffusion and precipitation of Phosphate in the Gomori test. J. Histochem. Cytochem.1, 442–446 (1953).Google Scholar
  40. Lang, K., u.G. Siebert: Die chemischen Leistungen der morphologischen Zellelemente. InFlaschenträger-Lehnartz, Teil I, Bd. b. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1954.Google Scholar
  41. Linderstrøm-Lang, K., andK. R. Mogensen: Studies on encymatic histochemistry, XXXI. Histological control of histochemical investigation. C. R. Lab. Carlsberg, Sér. chim.23, 27–35 (1938–1941).Google Scholar
  42. Lison, L.: La recherche histochimique des phosphatases. Étude Critique. Bull. Histol. appl. physiol. Path.25, 23–41 (1948).Google Scholar
  43. Lison, L.: Histochimie et cytochimie animales. Paris: Gauthier Villard 1953.Google Scholar
  44. Longley: Disk.-Bem. zum VortragJ. Feigin u.A. Wolf. in Proc. of the fifth Meet. of the Histochem. Soc. J. Histochem. Cytochem.2, 435 (1954).Google Scholar
  45. Loveless, A., andJ. F. Danielli: A dye phosphate for the histo-and cytochemical demonstration of alcaline Phosphatase with some observations of the differential behavior of nuclear and extranuclear enzymes. Quart. J. micr. Sci.90, 57–66 (1949).Google Scholar
  46. Maengwyn-Davies, G. D., andJ. S. Friedenwald: Histochemical studies of alkaline phosphatases in the tissues of the rat using frozen sections. J. cell comp. Physiol.36, 421–459 (1950).Google Scholar
  47. Martin, B. F., andF. Jakoby: Diffusion phenomenon complicating the histochemical reaction for alkaline phosphatase. J. Anat. (Lond.)83, 351–363 (1949).Google Scholar
  48. Mathies: Zit. nachTaft, Disk.-Bem. zum VortragJ. Feigin u.A. Wolf, Proc. Histochem. Soc. J. Histochem. Cytochem.2, 437 (1954).Google Scholar
  49. Menten, M. L., J. Junge andM. H. Green: A coupling histochemical Azo-dye test for alkaline phosphatase in the kifdney. J. biol. Chem.153, 471–477 (1944).Google Scholar
  50. Moog, F.: Non diffusibility of alkaline phosphatase in fixed tissues. Science114, 109 (1951).Google Scholar
  51. Nachlas, M. M., A. C. Young andA. M. Seligman: Problems of encymatic localisation by chemical reactions applied to tissue sections. J. Histochem. Cytochem.5, 565–583 (1957).Google Scholar
  52. Novikoff, A. B.: The validity of histochemical Phosphatase methods on the intracellular level. Science113, 320–325 (1951).Google Scholar
  53. Novikoff, A. B.: Histochemical demonstration of nuclear enzymes. Exp. Cell Res. Suppl.2, 123–140 (1952).Google Scholar
  54. Novikoff, A. B., andE. Padber: The contribution of differential centrifugation to the intracellular localisation of enzymes. J. Histochem. Cytochem.5, 552–564 (1957).Google Scholar
  55. Pearse, A. G. E.: Histochemistry. Theoretical and applied. London: Churchill 1953.Google Scholar
  56. Richterich, R.: Zit. nachP. Gedigk undE. Bontke, Z. Zellforsch.44, 495 (1956).Google Scholar
  57. Ruyter, J. H. C., andH. Neumann: A critical examination of the histochemical demonstration of alkaline phosphomonoesterase. Biochem. biophys. Acta3, 125–135 (1949).Google Scholar
  58. Schultz-Brauns, O.: Die Vorteile des Gefrierschneidens unfixierter Gewebe für die histologische Technik. Zbl. allg. Path. path. Anat.50, 273–277 (1931).Google Scholar
  59. Schultz-Brauns, O.: Verbesserungen und Erfahrungen bei Anwenden der Methode des Gefrierschneidens unfixierter Gewebe für die histologische Technik. Zbl. allg. Path. path. Anat.54, 225–243 (1932).Google Scholar
  60. Seki, M.: Untersuchungen mit nichtwässerigen Flüssigkeiten. I. Fixierung von Geweben in nichtwässerigen Flüssigkeiten. Z. Zellforsch.26, 305–320 (1937).Google Scholar
  61. Snoek, J.: Le placenta humain, S. 142. Paris: Masson & Cie. 1958.Google Scholar
  62. Spanner, R.: Neue Befunde über den mütterlichen und foetalen Kreislauf der Placenta. Münch. med. Wschr.1934, 1257.Google Scholar
  63. Stafford, R. O., andW. B. Atkinson: Effect of acetone and alcohol fixation and paraffin embedding on activity of acid and alkaline phosphatases in rat tissue. Science107, 279–281 (1948).Google Scholar
  64. Stark, G., u.W. Jung: Phosphatasen in der Placenta und ihren einzelnen Zellfraktionen. Arch. Gynäk.187, 398–405 (1956).Google Scholar
  65. Stieve, H.: Arch. Gynäk.174, 452 (1943). Zit. nachHörmann.Google Scholar
  66. Tahmisian: Antwort aufNovikoff: Histochemical demonstration of nuclear enzymes. Exp. Cell. Res., Suppl.2, 123 (1952).Google Scholar
  67. Takamatsu, H.: Histologische und biochemische Studien über die Phosphatase. Trans. Soc. Path. Jap.29, 492–498 (1939).Google Scholar
  68. Thomsen, K.: Über die Aktivität der alkalischen Phosphatase in der menschlichen Placenta. Arch. Gynäk.187, 1–19 (1955).Google Scholar
  69. Watson, M. L.: The nuclear envelope, its structure and relation to cytoplasmic membranes. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol.1, 257–270 (1955).Google Scholar
  70. Willstätter, R., u.M. Rohdewald: Über Desmo-Pepsin und Desmo-Kathepsin. Hoppe-Seylers Z. physiol. Chem.208, 258–272 (1932).Google Scholar
  71. Yokoyama, H. O., R. E. Stowell andR. M. Methews: Evaluation of histochemical alkaline phosphatase technics. Anat. Rec.109, 139–157 (1951).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1960

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Strauss
    • 1
  • G. Stark
    • 1
  1. 1.Aus der Universitäts-Frauenklinik MainzGermany

Personalised recommendations