On the origin of irreversibility in classical electrodynamic measurement processes
- 42 Downloads
We present a new formalism for the microscopic classical electrodynamics of point charges in which the dynamic absence of self-interactions is enforced by the action principle, without eliminating the field degrees of freedom. In this context, free local radiation fields are dynamically prohibited. Instead radiation is carried by charge-field functionals of the current which have a negative parity under mathematical time reversal. This leads to the dynamic requirement of a physical time arrow in the equations of motion in order to preserve the overall mathphysical time-reversal symmetry of the formalism. Since this physical time arrow emerges electrodynamically without the need of external thermodynamic or cosmological criteria, it offers a dynamical explanation for the origin of irreversibility in classical electrodynamic measurement processes.
“Science, like the arts, admits aesthetic criteria; it seeks theories that display ‘a proper conformity of the parts to one another and to the whole’ while still showing some strangeness in their proportion”—S. Chandrasekar.
KeywordsRadiation Radiation Field Measurement Process Action Principle Point Charge
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.F. Rohrlich,Classical Charged Particles (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massahcusetts, 1965), pp. 134–137.Google Scholar
- 2.J. D. Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1962).Google Scholar
- 3.D. Leiter, inFoundations of Radiation Theory and Quantum Electrodynamics, A. O. Barut, ed. (Plenum Press, New York, 1980), p. 195.Google Scholar
- 4.K. Gödel,Mon. Math. Phys. 38, 173 (1931).Google Scholar
- 5.D. R. Hofstadter,Gödel, Escher, Bach, An Eternal Golden Braid (Vintage Books, 1979), pp. 698–699.Google Scholar
- 6.J. A. Wheeler and R. P. Feynman,Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 157 (1945).Google Scholar
- 7.J. Huschilt, W. E. Baylis, D. Leiter, and G. Szamosi,Phys. Rev. D 7, 2844 (1973).Google Scholar
- 8.W. E. Baylis and J. Huschilt,Phys. Rev. D 13, 3237, 3256, 3262 (1976).Google Scholar
- 9.W. E. Baylis and J. Huschilt,Phys. Rev. D 17, 985 (1978).Google Scholar
- 10.E. J. Moniz and D. H. Sharp,Phys. Rev. D 15, 2850 (1977).Google Scholar
- 11.D. Leiter, “On Einstein Locality and the Physical Arrow of Time in Quantum Electrodynamic Measurement Processes,” submitted toFound. Phys. (1984).Google Scholar
- 12.B. Gal-Or,Cosmology, Physics, and Philosophy (Springer, New York, 1981), p. 306.Google Scholar
- 13.J. D. Bjorken and D. D. Drell,Relativistic Quantum Field Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965), Sections 15 and 16.Google Scholar