Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 14, Issue 10, pp 2343–2352 | Cite as

An experimental study of end effects in the extensional deformation of polymers

  • E. L. V. Lewis
Papers

Abstract

The sample geometry and the constraints of grips used in measurements of mechanical properties affect the values of the elastic constants obtained. This is known to be more serious for anisotropic materials. Three polymers have been examined in extension: oriented polyethylene terephthalate, isotropic low-density polyethylene, and oriented nylon 6. The results all show a linear increase of compliance with increasing reciprocal sample length. Subtracting the displacements of samples so short that the grips were initially in contact (“zero-length” samples) indicates that the effect is caused mainly by shear in the grips. Extrapolation of the results to zero reciprocal length gives the true sample compliance, and this removes discrepancies in comparing shear compliances derived from extensional and torsional methods.

Keywords

LDPE Draw Ratio Horizontal Straight Line Draw Direction Extensional Compliance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W. T. Read,J. Appl. Mech. 17 (1950) 349.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. L. V. Lewis, I. D. Richardson andI. M. Ward,J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 12 (1979) 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. O. Horgan,J. Elasticity 2 (1972) 169; 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. G. C. Arridge andM. J. Folkes,Polymer 17 (1976) 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. G. C. Arridge, P. J. Barham.C. J. Farrell andA. Keller,J. Mater. Sci. 11 (1976) 788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. J. Folkes andR. G. C. Arridge,J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 8 (1975) 1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. L. V. Lewis andI. M. Ward, to be published.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. H. Ladizesky andI. M. Ward,J. Mater. Sci. 8 (1973) 980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    I. Wilson, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leeds (1977).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. Wilson, N. H. Ladizesky andI. M. Ward,J. Mater. Sci. 11 (1976) 2177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    I. Wilson, A. Cunningham andI. M. Ward,ibid. 11 (1976) 2181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    I. Wilson, A. Cunningham, R. A. Duckett andI. M. Ward,ibid. 11 (1976) 2189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. B. Gupta andI. M. Ward,J. Macromol. Sci.-Phys. B1 (1967) 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    N. H. Ladizesky andI. M. Ward,ibid. B5 (1971) 661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Idem. ibid. B5 (1971) 745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Idem, ibid. B9 (1974) 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. L. V. Lewis andI. M. Ward,J. Macromol. Sci.-Phys. (submitted).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    H. A. Ghur andH. DeVries,J. Polymer Sci: Polymer Phys. Ed. 13 (1975) 835.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Inoue andS. Hoshino,ibid. 14 (1976) 1513.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    D. G. Hunt andM. W. Darlington,Polymer 19 (1978) 977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd. 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. L. V. Lewis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations