Foundations of Physics

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 239–296

Tachyon kinematics and causality: A systematic thorough analysis of the tachyon causal paradoxes

  • Erasmo Recami
Article

Abstract

The chronological order of the events along a spacelike path is not invariant under Lorentz transformations, as is well known. This led to an early conviction that tachyons would give rise to causal anomalies. A relativistic version of the Stückelberg-Feynman “switching procedure” (SWP) has been invoked as the suitable tool to eliminate those anomalies. The application of the SWP does eliminate the motions backwards in time, but interchanges the roles ofsource anddetector. This fact triggered the proposal of a host of causal “paradoxes.” Till now, however, it has not been recognized that such paradoxes can be sensibly discussed (and completely solved, at least “in microphysics”)only after the tachyon relativistic mechanics has been properly developed. We start by showing how to apply the SWP, both in the case ofordinary special relativity and in the case with tachyons. Then we carefully exploit the kinematics of the tachyon exchange between to (ordinary) bodies. Being finally able to tackle the tachyon causality problem, we successively solve the paradoxes of : (i) Tolman-Regge, (ii) Pirani, (iii) Edmonds, and (iv) Bell. Finally, we discuss a further, new paradox associated with the transmission of signals by modulated tachyon beams.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. C. Tolman,The Theory of Relativity of Motion (Berkeley, 1917), p. 54.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    O. M. Bilaniuk, V. K. Deshpande, and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Am. J. Phys. 30, 718 (1962).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Recami,Found. Phys. 8, 329–340 (1978).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Caldirola and E. Recami, inItalian Studies in the Philosophy of Science, M. L. Dalla Chiara, ed. (Reidel, Boston, 1980), pp. 249–298.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Garuccio, G. D. Maccarrone, E. Recami, and J. P. Vigier,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 27, 60–64 (1980).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Mignani and E. Recami,Phys. Lett. B 65, 148–150 (1976).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Gödel, inA. Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, P. A. Schilpp, ed. (Open Court, La Salle, 1973), p. 558.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Recami, inAlbert Einstein, 1879–1979: Relativity, Quanta and Cosmology, F. de Finis and M. Pantaleo, eds. (Johnson Reprints, New York, 1979), Vol. 2, Chap. 16, pp. 537–597. This ref. appeared also in Italian:Centenario di Einstein: Astrofisica e Cosmologia, Gravitazione, Quanti e Relativitá, M. Pantaleo, ed. (Giunti-Barbera, Florence, 1979), Chap. 18, pp. 1021–1097; and in Russian:Astrofizika, Kvanti i Teoriya Otnositelnosti, F. I. Fedorov, ed. (Mir, Moscow, 1982), pp. 53–128.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Recami and R. Mignani,Riv. Nuovo Cimento 4, 209–290, 398 (1974).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Recami, inTachyons, Monopoles, and Related Topics, E. Recami, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978), pp. 3–25.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Recami and G. Ziino,Nuovo Cimento A 33, 205–215 (1976).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. C. G. Stückelberg,Helv. Phys. Acta 14, 321, 588 (1941); see also O. Klein,Z. Phys. 53, 157 (1929).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. P. Feynman,Phys. Rev. 76, 749, 769 (1949).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Mignani and E. Recami,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 18, 5–9 (1977).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Mignani and E. Recami,Nuovo Cimento A 24, 438–448 (1974).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Mignani and E. Recami,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 11, 421–426 (1974).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Mignani and E. Recami,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 12, 299–320 (1975).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Pavšič and E. Recami,Lett. Nuovo Cimento (1982)34, 357–362. Erratum:35, 354 (1983).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. Feinberg,Phys. Rev. 159, 1089 (1967).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. Arzeliès,C. R. Acad. Sc. (Paris) A 279, 535 (1974).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. G. Cawley,Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 54, 132 (1969).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. C. L. Barnard and E. A. Sallin,Phys. Today 22 (10), 9 (1969).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    E. Recami,Accad. Naz. Lincei Rendic. Sc. (Roma) 49, 77–91 (1970).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. Baldo, G. Fonte, and E. Recami,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 4, 241–247 (1970).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    E. Recami, “Classical Tachyons,” Report INFN/AE-84/8 (INFN, Frascati, 1984), pp. 1–178.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    E. Recami and E. Modica,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 12, 263–265 (1975).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    G. Galilei:Dialogo... sopra i due massimi sistemi del mondo: Tolemaico e Copernicano (G. B. Landini, Florence, 1632).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    G. Galilei:Dialogue on the Great World Systems: Salisbury Translation, G. de Santillana, ed. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1953), p. 199.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    G. D. Maccarrone and E. Recami,Found. Phys. 14, 367–407 (1984).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    G. D. Maccarrone and E. Recami, Report INFN/AE-82/12 (INFN, Frascati, 1982), pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    W. V. Igńatowski,Phys. Lett. 21, 972 (1910).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    P. Frank and H. Rothe,Ann. Phys. (Leipz.) 34, 825 (1911).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    E. Hahn,Arch. Math. Phys. 21, 1 (1913).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    V. Lalan,Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. 65, 83 (1937).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    F. Severi, inCinquant'anni di Relatività, M. Pantaleo, ed. Giunti-Editrice Universitaria (Florence, 1955).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    A. Agodi,Lezioni di Fisica Teorica (Catania University, unpublished).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    M. Di Jorio,Nuovo Cimento B 22, 70 (1974).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    W. Rindler,Essential Relativity (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1969), Sec. 38.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    N. Berzi and V. Gorini,J. Math. Phys. 10, 1518 (1969).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    V. Gorini and A. Zecca,J. Math. Phys. 11, 2226 (1970).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    L. Lugiato and V. Gorini,J. Math. Phys. 13, 665 (1972).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    T. S. Shankara,Found. Phys. 4, 97 (1974).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    G. D. Maccarrone, M. Pavšič, and E. Recami,Nuovo Cimento B 73, 91–111 (1983).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    A. O. Barut, G. D. Maccarrone, and E. Recami,Nuovo Cimento A 71, 509–533 (1982).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    E. Recami and R. Mignani,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 4, 144–152 (1972).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    D. Leiter,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 1, 395 (1971).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    L. Parker,Phys. Rev. 138, 2287 (1969).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    O. M. Bilaniuk and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Phys. Today 22 (5), 43 (1969).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    P. Castorina and E. Recami,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 22, 195 (1978).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    G. D. Maccarrone and E. Recami,Nuovo Cimento A 57, 85–101 (1980).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    E. Recami, inEnciclopedia EST Mondadori, Annuario 73 (Mondadori, Milano, 1973), pp. 85–94, in Italian.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    E. Recami,Scientia 109, 721–727 (1975).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    P. Caldirola and E. Recami,Epistemologia (Genova) 1, 263–304 (1978).Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    C. Gregory,Nature (London) 206, 702 (1965).Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    C. Gregory,Nature Phys. Sci. 239, 56–57 (1972).Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    C. Schwartz,Phys. Rev. D 25, 356 (1982). See also D. Korff and Z. Fried,Nuovo Cimento A 52, 173 (1967).Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    E. Recami and R. Mignani,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 8, 780–782 (1973).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    G. D. Maccarrone and E. Recami,Found. Phys. 10, 949–957 (1980).Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    M. E. Arons and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Phys. Rev. 173, 1622 (1968).Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    J. Dhar and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Phys. Rev. 174, 1808 (1968).Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    M. Glück,Nuovo Cimento A 62, 791 (1969).Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    M. Camenzind,Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 1, 41 (1970).Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    D. J. Thoules,Nature (London) 224, 506 (1969).Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    W. B. Rolnick,Phys. Rev. 183, 1105 (1969).Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    W. B. Rolnick,Phys. Rev. D6, 2300 (1972).Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    G. A. Benford, D. L. Book, and W. A. Newcomb,Phys. Rev. D 2, 263 (1970).Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    J. Strnad,Fortsch. Phys. 18, 237 (1970); J. Strnad and A. Kodre,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 12, 261 (1975).Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    J. S. Trefil, inTachyons, Monopoles and Related Topics, E. Recami, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978), pp. 27–30; R. G. Root and J. S. Trefil:Lett. Nuovo Cimento 3, 412 (1970).Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    P. L. Csonka,Nucl. Phys. B 21, 436 (1970).Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    E. C. G. Sudarshan, inSymposia on Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, Vol.10 (New York; 1970), p. 129.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    O. M. Bilaniuk and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Nature (London) 223, 386 (1969).Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    A. F. Antippa,Nuovo Cimento A 10, 389–406 (1972).Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    A. F. Antippa and A. E. Everett,Phys. Rev. D 8, 2352 (1973).Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    E. Recami and W. A. Rodrigues,Found. Phys. 12, 709–718 (1982); plus Erratum,13, 533 (1983).Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    M. Baldo and E. Recami,Lett. Nuovo Cimento (1st Ser.) 2, 643–646 (1969).Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    E. Recami, unpublished work and unpublished pieces of work in collaboration with H. B. Nielsenet al., 1974.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    E. Recami, inTopics in Theoretical and Experimental Gravitation Physics, V. De Sabbata and J. Weber, eds. (Plenum, New York, 1977), pp. 305–321.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Ø. Grøn,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 23, 97 (1978).Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    R. Mignani and E. Recami,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 7, 388–390 (1973).Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    H. Bondi,Relativity and Common Sense (Doubleday, New York, 1964).Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    E. Recami, G. D. Maccarrone, H. B. Nielsen, H. C. Corben, M. Rodonò, and S. Genovesi, unpublished work, 1976.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    R. Mignani and E. Recami,Nuovo Cimento A 14, 169–189 (1973); Erratum,16, 208 (1973).Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    H. Bacry,Phys. Today 25 (11), 15 (1972).Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    H. Bacry, Ph. Combe, and P. Sorba,Rep. Math. Phys. 5, 145 (1974).Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    A. O. Barut,Phys. Lett. A 67, 257 (1978).Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    K. L. Sala,Phys. Rev. A 19, 2377 (1979).Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    A. O. Barut, inTachyons, Monopoles, and Related Topics, E. Recami, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978), p. 143.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    A. Peres,Phys. Lett. A 31, 361 (1970).Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    J. Souček,J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 14, 1629–1640 (1981).Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    E. Recami and G. D. Maccarrone,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 37, 345 (1983).Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    D. Bohm,The Special Theory of Relativity (Benjamin, New York, 1965).Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    T. Regge,Cronache dell'Universo (Boringhieri, Torino, 1981), pp. 21–22.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    F. A. E. Pirani,Phys. Rev. D 1, 3224 (1970).Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    J. A. Parmentola and D. D. H. Yee,Phys. Rev. D 4, 1912 (1971).Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    E. C. G. Sudarshan, Report CPT-81/AEC-30 (Texas University, Austin, 1970); E. C. G. Sudarshan, inProceedings of the VIII Nobel Symposium, N. Swartholm, ed. (New York, 1970), p. 385.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    J. D. Edmonds,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 18, 498 (1977).Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    E. Recami,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 18, 501–502 (1977).Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    J. S. Bell, private communications (1979, 1985).Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    R. Fox, C. G. Kuper, and S. G. Lipson,Nature (London) 223, 597 (1969).Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    R. Fox, C. G. Kuper, and S. G. Lipson,Proc. R. Soc. London A 316, 515 (1970).Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    M. Pavšič and E. Recami,Nuovo Cimento A 36, 171 (1976); Erratum,46, 298 (1978).Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    J. A. Wheeler and R. P. Feynman,Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 157 (1945).Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    J. A. Wheeler and R. P. Feynman,Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 425 (1949).Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    J. R. Gott, III,Nuovo Cimento B 22, 49 (1974). See also M. Flato and M. Guenin,Helv. Phys. Acta 50, 117 (1977).Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    H. P. Stapp,Am. J. Phys. 53, 306 (1985); G. C. Hegerfeld,Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2395 (1985); E. P. Wigner, private communication (1976); J. P. Vigier,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 29, 476 (1980); B. d'Espagnat,Found. Phys. 11, 205 (1981); C. W. Rietdijk and F. Selleri,Found. Phys. 15, 303 (1985).Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    R. G. Newton,Phys. Rev. 162, 1274 (1967).Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    J. D. Edmonds,Found. Phys. 6, 33 (1976).Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    A. Einstein and P. Bergmann,Ann. Math. 39, 683 (1938).Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    J. D. Edmonds,Found. Phys. 4, 473 (1974).Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    K. Lake and R. C. Roeder,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 12, 641–644 (1975).Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    M. Pavšič and E. Recami:Lett. Nuovo Cimento 19, 273–278 (1977).Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    O. Costa de Beauregard, inThe Wave-Particle Dualism, S. Dineret al., eds. (Reidel, Dortrecht, 1984), p. 485.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erasmo Recami
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Dipartimento di FisicaUniversità Statale di CataniaCataniaItaly
  2. 2.I.N.F.N., Sezione di CataniaCataniaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Applied MathematicsState University of CampinasCampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations