Description of creep damage by means of stochastic geometry

  • H. Riesch-Oppermann
  • A. Brockner-Foit
Article
  • 22 Downloads

Conclusions

In this paper, some ideas concerning the statistical modelling of damage on a microstructural level and its relation to macroscopic quantities are given.

Two examples using different kinds of approaches for the damage modelling are presented. In the first part, creep damage of an austenitic steel is modelled in a phenomenological way according to experimental observations. This leads to patterns of simulated grain boundary failure, which are in qualitative agreement with experimental findings. A method is indicated how to incorporate micromechanical models in macroscopic relations for creep behavior.

In the second part, a micromechanical model for creep damage of alumina is incorporated into the simulated grain boundary structure. Characteristic patterns of the different simulation procedures are shown.

As a first step, the results seem to be encouraging. The advantages of the use of stochastic geometry methods in the light of the possible inclusion of more sophisticated models for grain boundary failure and the interaction effects of cavitated grain boundary facets are twofold:

Any kind of grain boundary failure can be handled by the stochastic model which is therefore applicable for different kinds of material.

Interaction effects of cavitated grain boundary facets can be handled in a very efficient way, which allows the simulation of realistic configurations without a prohibitively large amount of computing time.

The framework of the stochastic geometry seems therefore to be a very efficient tool for the development of micromechanical damage models and their relation to a macroscopic description of damage.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    M. F. Ashby and B. F. Dyson, Creep Damage Mechanisms and Micromechanisms, Advances in Fracture Research (Fracture 84), Vol. 1, 3–30.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. F. Dyson, Continuous Cavity Nucleation and Creep Fracture, Scripta Metall.,17, 31–37 (1983).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. W. Hutchinson,“Constitutive behavior and crack tip fields for materials undergoing creep-constrained grain boundary cavitation,” Acta Metall.,31, 1079–1083 (1983).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Riedel, Fracture at High Temperatures, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1987).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Stamm and U. von Estorff, “The use of creep damage measurements in combination with material models for residual lifetime assessment,” in: ECF 8 Fracture Behavior and Design of Materials and Structures, Turin (1990).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. J. Green and R. Sibson, “Computing Dirichlet tesselations in the plane,” The Computer Journal,21, 168–173 (1978).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. S. Chan and R. A. Page, “Continuous cavity nucleation by stochastic grain boundary sliding,” J. Mat. Sci.,25, 4622–4629 (1990).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Riesch-Oppermann
    • 1
  • A. Brockner-Foit
    • 1
  1. 1.Karlsruhe Nuclear Research CenterUniversity of KarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations