Abstract
The culture of the powerful has yet to receive the scrutiny required for social science to build up a full picture of social relations. This paper attempts to examine the problems that confront the researcher in the study of powerful groups and institutions in our society. It is based on the author's experience of working on the first piece of independent social science research commissioned by the British Ministry of Defence — an enquiry into the relations between the military and the media at times of armed conflict, with particular reference to the Falklands conflict of 1982. Powerful interests will not provide the opportunity for social scientists to study their workings at first hand. However with the increased involvement of these interests in the sponsorship of research the social scientist is in a position to relate his or her dealings with the powerful as part of the research process. The paper focusses on four aspects of the research process: the commissioning of the project, the negotiation of access to the key figures and documentary material, the research techniques used, and the response to the findings of the study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, V.,The Media and the Falklands Campaign (London: MacMillan, 1986).
American Journal of Sociology, special editionOf Sociology and the Interview, September 1956, Volume LXII, Number 2.
Bell, C. and S. Encel,Inside the Whale: Ten Personal Accounts of Social Research (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1978).
Bell, C., “Studying the Locally Powerful,” in C. Bell and S. Encel, op cit.
Becker, H.,Sociological Work: Method and Substance (London: Allen and Lane, 1970).
Benney, M. and E. Hughes, “Of Sociology and the Interview”, editorial,American Journal of Sociology, op cit., 1956.
Burns, T.,The BBC: Public Institution, Private World (London: MacMillan, 1977).
Cockerell, M., P. Hennessy and D. Walker,Sources Close to the Prime Minister (London: MacMillan, 1984).
Dexter, L., “The Good Will of Important People: More on the Jeopardy of the Interview”Public Opinion Quarterly 1964 (28: 4).
Encel, S., “In Search of Power,” in C. Bell and S. Encel, (eds.), op cit., 1978.
Harris, R.,Gotcha! The Media, the Government and the Falklands Campaign (London: Faber and Faber, 1983).
House of Commons Select Defence Committee,The Handling of Press and Public Information during the Falkland Campaign (London: HMSO, Volume HC 17-1/2, 1982).
Lejeune, A., “The War of Words Behind the Fighting,”Daily Mail June 11, 1982.
McDermott, K., “In and Out of the Game,” in G. Clare Wenger, (ed.),The Research Relationship (London: Allen and Unwin, 1987).
Mercer, D., G. Mungham and K. Williams,The Fog of War (London: Heinemann, 1987).
Mungham, G. and P. Thomas, “Studying Lawyers: Aspects of the Theory, Method and Politics of Social Research,British Journal of Law and Society 1981 (8: 1).
Nader, L., “Up the Anthropologist — Perspectives Gained from Studying Up,” in D. Hymes, (ed.),Reinventing Anthropology (New York: Randon House, 1974).
Pincher, C.,Inside Story (London: Sidgwick and Jackson, 1978).
Pincher, C.,Secret Offensive (London: Sidgwick and Jackson, 1985).
Protheroe, A., “Why we Have Lost the Information War,”The Listener June 3, 1982.
Ponting, C.,Whitehall: Tragedy and Farce London (Sphere, 1986).
Royal United Services Institute,Defence and the Mass Media, Report of proceedings of seminar held on October 13, 1970.
Schlesinger, P., “Between Sociology and Journalism,” in H. Christian, (ed.),The Sociology of the Press and Journalism (Keele: Keele University Press, 1980).
Wenger, G. Clare (ed.)The Research Relationship (London: Allen and Unwin, 1987).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, K. Researching the powerful: Problems and possibilities of social research. Contemporary Crises 13, 253–274 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00729343
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00729343