Advertisement

Contemporary Crises

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 65–79 | Cite as

The purpose of knowledge: pragmatism and the praxis of marxist criminology

  • Pat O'Malley
Article

Abstract

This paper revives and revises the argument that there is no place for a concept of crime in marxist theory, and consequently that there is no theoretical justification for the development of marxist criminology. However, earlier essays along these lines have adopted a rationalist epistemology in advancing this case — with its attendant difficulties of idealism, privileged conceptualization and inflexibility. The present paper attempts to escape such problems, and to extend the critique of criminological theorization, by developing its case on the basis of a pragmatist epistemology. It is argued that the conflicting aims of marxist theory and the bourgeois legal theory from which ‘crime’ is transferred make it difficult for marxist criminology to generate a unified theory to guide political practice and research. Moreover, Marxists' privileging of the concept of crime may be systematically blinding them to political developments which render criminology historically obsolescent.

Keywords

Unify Theory International Relation Legal Theory Political Development Theoretical Justification 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abel, R. (1981). ‘A critique of American tort law’,British Journal of Law and Society 8: 199–231.Google Scholar
  2. Abel, R. (1982). ‘The contradictions of informal justice’, in: R. Abel (ed.)The politics of informal justice. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, P. (1980).Arguments within English marxism. London: NLB/Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Balbus, I. (1977). ‘Commodity from and legal form. An essay on the relative autonomy of the law’,Law and Society Review 11: 571–588.Google Scholar
  5. Bankowski, Z., Mungham, G. and Young, P. (1977). ‘Radical criminology or radical criminologist?’Contemporary Crises 1: 37–52.Google Scholar
  6. Barnett, H. (1979). ‘Wealth, Crime and Capital Accumulation’,Contemporary Crises 3: 171–180.Google Scholar
  7. Block, A. and Chambliss, W. (1981).Organizing crime. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  8. Boehringer, G., Brown, D., Edgeworth, B., Hogg, R. and Ramsay, I. (1983). ‘Law and order for progressives? An Australian response’,Crime and Social Justice 9: 2–12.Google Scholar
  9. Cain, M. (1985). ‘Beyond informal justice’,Contemporary crises 9: 287–327.Google Scholar
  10. Carson, W. (1980). ‘The ambiguity of white collar crime’, in: M. Fitzgerald et al. (eds)Crime and Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Carson, W. (1981).The other price of Britain's oil. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
  12. Charney, J. (1974). ‘The need for constitutional protections for defendants in civil penalty cases’,Cornell Law Review 59: 478–497.Google Scholar
  13. Clarke, D. (1978). ‘Marxism, justice and the justice model’,Contemporary Crises 2: 27–62.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, S. (1979). ‘The punitive city. Notes on the dispersal of social control’,Contemporary Crises 3: 339–363.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, S. (1984).Visions of social control. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Cutler, A., Hindess, B., Hirst, P. and Hussain, A. (1977).Marx's ‘Capital’ and capital today. Vol. 1. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  17. Fitzpatrick, P. (1983). ‘Marxism and legal pluralism’,Australian Journal of Law and Society 1: 46–58.Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (1977).Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  19. Frankel, B. (1983).Beyond the state? Dominant theories and socialist strategies. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Freese, L. and Sell, J. (1980). ‘Constructing axiomatic theories in sociology’, in: L. Freese (ed.)Theoretical methods in sociology. Seven essays. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  21. Freiberg, A. (1984).The civil offense. Melbourne: Monash University. Unpublished LLM Thesis.Google Scholar
  22. Freiberg, A. and O'Malley, P. (1984). ‘State intervention and the civil offense’,Law and Society Review 18: 373–394.Google Scholar
  23. Garland, D. (1985). ‘The Criminal and His Science’,British Journal of Criminology 25: 109–137.Google Scholar
  24. Greenberg, D. (1981).Crime and capitalism. Readings in marxist criminology. New York: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  25. Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J. and Roberts, B. (1978).Policing the crisis. Mugging, the state, and law and order. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Henry, S. (1985). ‘Community justice, capitalist society and human agency’,Law and Society Review 19: 303–321.Google Scholar
  27. Hinch, R. (1983). ‘Marxist criminology in the 1970s: Clarifying the clutter’,Crime and Social Justice 19: 65–74.Google Scholar
  28. Hindess, B. and Hirst, P. (1977).Mode of Production and Social Formation. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  29. Hirst, P. (1975). ‘Marx and Engels on law, crime and morality’, in: I. Taylor, P. Walton and J. Young (eds) (1975).Critical criminology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  30. Hulsman, L. (1986). ‘Critical Criminology and the Concept of Crime’,Contemporary Crises 10: 63–80.Google Scholar
  31. Kerruish, V. and Duncanson, I. (1986). ‘The regulation of civil liberty’,Law in Context 4: 1–28.Google Scholar
  32. Lea, J. and Young, J. (1984).What is to be done about law and order? London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  33. Linebaugh, P. (1976). ‘Karl Marx, the theft of wood and working class composition’,Crime and Social Justice 6: 36–53.Google Scholar
  34. Matza, D. (1969).Becoming deviant. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  35. O'Malley, P. (1979). ‘Class struggle, land and social banditry’,Social Problems 26: 271–283.Google Scholar
  36. O'Malley, P. (1982a). ‘The invisible censor. Civil law and the state delegation of press control 1890–1952’,Media, Culture and Society 4: 323–337.Google Scholar
  37. O'Malley, P. (1982b). ‘Historical practice and the production of marxist legal theory’,Crime and Social Justice 18: 53–61.Google Scholar
  38. O'Malley, P. (1985). ‘The illegal sector of capital. A theoretical examination of “Organizing crime”’,Contemporary Crises 9: 81–92.Google Scholar
  39. O'Malley, P. (1987a). ‘Marxist Theory and Marxist Criminology’,Crime and Social Justice.Google Scholar
  40. O'Malley, P. (1987b). ‘Regulating contradictions. The Australian Press Council and the dispersal of social control’,Law and Society Review 21: 101–126.Google Scholar
  41. O'Malley, P. (Forthcoming). ‘The Place of Crime in Popular History’, in: V. Burgmann and J. Lee (eds)Australia Since the British invasion, Vol. 3. Melbourne: McPhee Gribble.Google Scholar
  42. Pashukanis, E. (1978).Law and marxism. A general theory. London: Ink Links.Google Scholar
  43. Reasons, C., Ross, L. and Patterson, C. (1982). ‘Your money or your life. Workers' health in Canada’,Crime and Social Justice 17: 55–60.Google Scholar
  44. Rorty, R. (1982).Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  45. Schwendinger, J. and Schwendinger, H. (1975). ‘Defenders of order or guardians of human rights?’, in: I. Taylor et al. (eds)Critical criminology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  46. Spitzer, S. (1980). ‘Left Wing’ Criminology — An Infant Disorder?’, in: J. Inciardi (ed.)Radical Criminology: The Coming Crisis. Beverly Hills: Sage publications.Google Scholar
  47. Spitzer, S. (1982). ‘The dialectics of formal and informal control’, in: R. Abel (ed.)The politics of informal justice. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  48. Steinert, H. (1986). ‘Beyond crime and punishment’,Contemporary Crises 10: 21–38.Google Scholar
  49. Sutherland, E. (1949).White Collar Crime. New York: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
  50. Taylor, I. (1981).Law and order. Arguments for socialism. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  51. Taylor, I. and Walton, P. (1975). ‘Radical Deviancy Theory: A Reply to Paul Q. Hirst’, in: I. Taylor, P. Walton and J. Young (eds) (1975).Critical Criminology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  52. Taylor, I. (1975). ‘Critical Criminology in Britain. Review and Prospects’, in: I. Taylor et al. (eds)Critical criminology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  53. Thompson, E. (1975).Whigs and hunters. The origins of the Black Act. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  54. Thompson, E. (1978). ‘The poverty of theory’, in: E. Thompson (ed.)The poverty of theory and other essays. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
  55. Winslow, C. (1975). ‘Sussex smugglers’, in: D. Hay, P. Linebaugh, J. Rule, E. Thompson and C. Winslow (eds)Albion's fatal tree. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  56. Young, J. (1975). ‘Working Class Criminology’, in: I. Taylor et al. (eds)Critical criminology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pat O'Malley
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Legal StudiesLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations