Contemporary Crises

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 157–178 | Cite as

Anomie and corporate deviance

  • Nikos Passas
Articles

Abstract

This paper elaborates on Merton's theory of anomie, while aiming at the enhancement of our understanding of processes conducive to corporate deviance. It attempts to consolidate points made by theorists operating in diverse, often considered as conflicting, orientations or perspectives. A “synthetic” or “integrated scheme” is, thus, put forward, which can help appreciate the background against which corporate deviance is likely to occur. Moreover, it is argued that contemporary societies are inherently conducive to anomic trends. Such trends bring about not only lower-class deviance and crime — to which anomie theory has been traditionally applied — but also high-class and corporate deviance. Against claims by some scholars that the former is a matter of greater concern, it is suggested that the latter is at least as serious a problem and that it has significant implications for the social order.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arlacchi, P.,Mafia Business: The Mafia Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (London: Verso, 1986).Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, J.S., “Social Irresponsibility in Management”,Journal of Business Research 1977 (5), 185–213.Google Scholar
  3. Aubert, V., “White-Collar Crime and Social Structure”, in G. Geis (ed.),White-Collar Criminal: The Offender in Business and the Professions (New York: Atherton Press, 1968), 173–184.Google Scholar
  4. Baumhart, R.C., “How Ethical Are Businessmen?” in G. Geis (ed.),White-Collar Criminal: The Offender in Business and the Profession (New York: Atherton Press, 1968), 119–135.Google Scholar
  5. Bequai, A.,White-Collar Crime: A Twentieth Century Crisis (Lexington and Toronto: D.C. Heath, 1978).Google Scholar
  6. Bowles, S. and R. Edwards,Understanding Capitalism (New York: Harper and Row, 1985).Google Scholar
  7. Box, S.,Ideology, Crime and Mystification (London and New York: Tavistock, 1983).Google Scholar
  8. Bradley, D. and R. Wilkie,The Concept of Organisation (Glasgow and London: Blackie, 1974).Google Scholar
  9. Braithwaite, J., “The Myth of Social Class and Criminality Reconsidered”.American Sociological Review 1981 (46: 1), 36–57.Google Scholar
  10. Braithwaite, J., “Enforced Self-Regulation: A New Strategy for Corporate Crime Control”.Michigan Law Review 1982 (80: 7), 1466–1507.Google Scholar
  11. Braithwaite, J.,Corporate Crime in the Pharmaceutical Industry (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, [1984], 1986).Google Scholar
  12. Carson, W.G., “White-Collar Crime and the Enforcement of Factory Legislation,” in W.G. Carson and P. Wiles (eds.),The Sociology of Crime and Delinquency in Britain (London: Martin Robertson, [1971], 1975), Vol. 1, 220–236.Google Scholar
  13. Carson, W.G.,The Other Price of Britain's Oil: Safety and Control in the North Sea (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1982).Google Scholar
  14. Chambliss, W.J., “Vice, Corruption, Bureaucracy and Power,” in W.J. Chambliss and M. Mankoff (eds.),Whose Law? What Order? A Conflict Approach to Criminology (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1976), 162–183.Google Scholar
  15. Clinard, M.B.,Corporate Ethics and Crime (London: Sage, 1983).Google Scholar
  16. Clinard, M.B. and D.J. Abbott,Crime in Developing Countries: A Comparative Perspective (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1973).Google Scholar
  17. Clinard, M.B. and R. Quinney,Criminal Behavior Systems: A Typology (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973).Google Scholar
  18. Clinard, M.B., P.C. Yeager, J. Brissette, D. Petrashek and E. Harries,Illegal Corporate Behavior (Washington, D.C.: Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, 1979).Google Scholar
  19. Clinard, M.B. and P.C. Yeager,Corporate Crime (New York: The Free Press, 1980).Google Scholar
  20. Conklin, J.,Illegal But Not Criminal: Business Crime in America (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1977).Google Scholar
  21. Cressey, D.R.,Other People's Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement (Glencoe: The Free Press, 1953).Google Scholar
  22. Cullen, F.T.,Rethinking Crime and Deviance Theory: The Emergence of a Structuring Tradition (Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman & Allanheld, 1984).Google Scholar
  23. Cullen, F., B.G. Link, and C.W. Polanzi, “The Seriousness of Crime Revisited: Have Attitudes Towards White-Collar Crime Changed?”Criminology 1982 (20: 1), 83–102.Google Scholar
  24. Cullen, F.T., W.J. Maakestad, and G. Cavender, “The Ford Pinto Case and Beyond: Corporate Crime, Moral Boundaries and the Criminal Sanction”, in E. Hochstedler (ed.),Corporations as Criminals (Beverly Hills, London and New Delhi: Sage, 1984), 107–130.Google Scholar
  25. Cullen, F.T., W.J. Maakestad, and G. Cavender,Corporate Crime Under Attack (Cincinnati: Anderson, 1987).Google Scholar
  26. Dahrendorf, R.,Law and Order: The Hamlyn Lectures (London: Stevens & Son, 1985).Google Scholar
  27. Denzin, N.K., “Notes on the Criminogenic Hypothesis: A Case Study of the American Liquor Industry”,American Sociological Review 1977 (42: 6), 905–920.Google Scholar
  28. Durkheim, E.,Suicide (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, [1930], 1983).Google Scholar
  29. Ermann, M.D. and R.J. Lundman,Corporate Deviance (New York: Holt, Rinchart & Winston, 1982).Google Scholar
  30. Finney, H.C. and H.R. Lesieur, “A Contingency Theory of Organizational Crime”, in S.B. Bacharach (ed.),Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1982).Google Scholar
  31. Foucault, M.,Surveiller et Punir (Paris: Gallimard, 1975).Google Scholar
  32. Geis, G., “The Heavy Electrical Equipment Antitrust Cases of 1961”, in G. Geis (ed.),White-Collar Criminal: The Offender in Business and the Professions (New York: Atherton Press, 1968), 103–118.Google Scholar
  33. Getschow, G., “Some Middle Managers Cut Corners to Achieve High Corporate Goals”,The Wall Street Journal, 1979 (Nov. 8: 1).Google Scholar
  34. Gibbons, D.C.,Society, Crime and Criminal Behavior, 5th ed. (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1987).Google Scholar
  35. Green, M.J.,The Closed Enterprise System: Ralph Nader's Study Group Report on Antitrust Enforcement (New York: Grossman, 1972).Google Scholar
  36. Gross, E., “Organisational Crime: A Theoretical Perspective”, in N. Denzin (ed.),Studies in Symbolic Interaction (Greenwich: JAI Press, 1978a), 55–85.Google Scholar
  37. Gross, E., “Organisations as Criminal Actors”, in J. Braithwaite and P. Wilson (eds.),The Two Faces of Deviance (St. Lucia, Queensland: Queensland University Press, 1978b), 199–213.Google Scholar
  38. Hall, R.H.,Organisations: Structure and Process (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1977).Google Scholar
  39. Jackall, R., “Crime in the Suites”,Contemporary Sociology 1980 (9: 3), 354–358.Google Scholar
  40. Kellens, G., “Sociological and Psychological Aspects [of Economic Crime]”, in European Committee on Crime Problems,Criminological Aspects of Economic Crime (Strasbourg, 1977), 69–111.Google Scholar
  41. Kinsey, R., J. Lea and J. Young,Losing the Fight Against Crime (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986).Google Scholar
  42. Kramer, R.C., “Corporate Criminality: the Development of an Idea” in E. Hochstedler (ed.),Corporations as Criminals (Beverly Hills and London: Sage, 184), 13–37.Google Scholar
  43. Krisberg, B.,Crime and Privilege: Toward a New Criminology (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1975).Google Scholar
  44. Lea, J. and J. Young,What is to be done about Law and Order? (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1984).Google Scholar
  45. Leigh, L.H., “Policy and Punitive Measures in Respect of Economic Offences”, in European Committee on Crime Problems,Criminological Aspects of Economic Crime (Strasbourg, 1977), 113–180.Google Scholar
  46. Levi, M.,Regulating Fraud: White-Collar Crime and the Criminal Process (London and New York: Tavistock, 1987).Google Scholar
  47. Matza, D.,Becoming Deviant (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1969).Google Scholar
  48. McIntosh, M., “Changes in the Organisation of Thieving”, in S. Cohen (ed.),Images of Deviance (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, [1971], 1982).Google Scholar
  49. McIntosh, M.,The Organisation of Crime (London and Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1975).Google Scholar
  50. Merton, R.K., “Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science”,American Sociological Review 1957 (22: 6), 635–659.Google Scholar
  51. Merton, R.K.,Social Theory and Social Structure (New York: The Free Press, 1968).Google Scholar
  52. Passas, N., “Anomie and Relative Deprivation”, paper presented at the plenary session of the annual meeting of theEastern [American] Sociological Society (Boston, U.S.A., 1987).Google Scholar
  53. Passas, N., “Merton's Theory of Anomie and Deviance: an Elaboration”, (Ph. D. thesis, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, 1988).Google Scholar
  54. Passas, N., “Understanding High Status Occupational Deviance”, paper delivered at the AnnualSocio-Legal Conference (Edinburgh, Scotland, 1989).Google Scholar
  55. Pearce, F.,The Crimes of the Powerful: Marxism, Deviance and Crime (London: Pluto Press, 1976).Google Scholar
  56. Peters, T.J. and R.H. Waterman, Jr.,In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best Run Corporations (New York: Harper & Row, 1982).Google Scholar
  57. Scherer, F.M.,Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1980).Google Scholar
  58. Schrager, L.S. and J.F. Short, Jr., “Toward a Sociology of Organisational Crime”,Social Problems 1978 (25: 4), 407–419.Google Scholar
  59. Siegel, L.J.,Criminology (St. Paul: West, 1983).Google Scholar
  60. Silk, L. and D. Vogel,Ethics and Profits: The Crisis of Confidence in American Business (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1976).Google Scholar
  61. Simon, H.A., “Theories of Decision Making in Economics and Behavioural Science”, in F.G. Castles, D.J. Murray, C.J. Pollitt and D.C. Potter (eds.),Decisions, Organisations and Society (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1976), 30–48.Google Scholar
  62. Smart, A., “The Informal Regulation of Illegal Economic Activities: Comparisons between the Squatter Property Market and Organised Crime”,International Journal of the Sociology of Law 1988 (16: 1), 91–101.Google Scholar
  63. Smith, R.A., “The Incredible Electrical Conspiracy”, in M.E. Wolfgang, L. Savitz and N. Johnston (eds.),The Sociology of Crime and Delinquency (New York: Wiley, 1970), 529–548.Google Scholar
  64. Spencer, J.C., A Study of Incarcerated White-Collar Offenders, in G. Geis (ed.),White-Collar Criminal: The Offender in Business and the Professions (New York: Atherton Press, 1968), 335–346.Google Scholar
  65. Staw, B.M. and E. Szwajkowski, “The Scarcity-Munificence Component of Organisational Environments and the Commission of Illegal Acts”,Administrative Science Quarterly, 1975 (20: 3), 345–354.Google Scholar
  66. Stinchcombe, A.L., “Merton's Theory of Social Structure”, in L.A. Coser, (ed.),The Idea of Social Structure: Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1975), 11–23.Google Scholar
  67. Stouffer, S. and J. Toby, “Role Conflict and Personality”,American Journal of Sociology, 1951 (56: 5: 5), 395–406.Google Scholar
  68. Sutherland, E.H.,White Collar Crime (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, [1949], 1961).Google Scholar
  69. Sykes, G.M. and D. Matza, “Techniques of Neutralisation: A Theory of Delinquency”,American Sociological Review, 1957 (22: 6), 664–670.Google Scholar
  70. Szasz, A., “Corporations, Organized Crime, and the Disposal of Hazardous Waste: An Examination of the Making of a Criminogenic Regulatory Structure”,Criminology, 1986 (24: 1), 1–27.Google Scholar
  71. Tiedemann, K., “Phenomenology of Economic Crime”, in European Committee on Crime Problems,Criminological Aspects of Economic Crime (Strasbourg, 1977), 9–68.Google Scholar
  72. Vaughan, E., “Toward Understanding Unlawful Organizational Behavior”,Michigan Law Review, 1982 (80: 7), 1377–1402.Google Scholar
  73. Vaughan, E.,Controlling Unlawful Organizational Behavior: Social Structure and Corporate Misconduct (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, [1983], 1985).Google Scholar
  74. Whyte, W.F., “Social Organisation in the Slums”,American Sociological Review, 1943 (8), 34–39.Google Scholar
  75. Wilson, J.Q.,Thinking About Crime (New York: Vintage, 1975).Google Scholar
  76. Young, T., “Corporate Crime: A Critique of the Clinard Report”,Contemporary Crises, 1981 (5), 323–336.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikos Passas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations