The peak in the thermal conductivity of Cu-O superconductors: Electronic or phononic origin?
- 52 Downloads
- 19 Citations
Abstract
The thermal conductivityК of hole-doped Cu-O plane high-T c perovskites exhibits a dramatic increase belowT c which results in a pronounced peak nearT c /2. The origin of this peak was initially thought to arise from an enhancement in the mean-free path of phonons as the charge carriers undergo condensation. Indeed, excellent fits to the data can be obtained with physically reasonable parameters using the conventional theory of lattice conduction in superconductors. In contrast, a recently observed sharp decrease in the quasiparticle scattering rate of YBCO single crystals belowT c has motivated proposals for an electronic origin of the thermal conductivity peak. We shall critically examine experimental evidence and highlight relative advantages and shortcomings of the two contrasting interpretations. Furthermore, we shall draw attention to recently available data on the relaxation time of out-of-equilibrium carriers in Cu-O superconductors obtained using pump-probe femtosecond laser studies and what new light they shed on the controversy.
Key words
High-Tc superconductors thermal conductivity scattering ratePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.C. Uher, inPhysical Properties of High-Temperature Superconductors, D. M. Ginsberg, ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992), Vol. 3. p. 159.Google Scholar
- 2.C. Uher and A. B. Kaiser,Phys. Rev. B 36, 5680 (1987).Google Scholar
- 3.S. D. Peacor, J. L. Cohn, and C. Uher,Phys. Rev. B 43, 8721 (1991).Google Scholar
- 4.S. D. Peacor, D. Glick, U. Welp, and C. Uher, unpublished.Google Scholar
- 5.K. Mendelssohn and J. Olsen,Proc. Phys. Soc. A 63, 2 (1950).Google Scholar
- 6.B. T. Geilikman and V. Z. Kresin,Sov. Phys. Doklady 3, 116 (1958);Sov. Phys. JETP 9, 1385 (1959).Google Scholar
- 7.J. Bardeen, G. Rickayzen, and L. Tewordt,Phys. Rev. 113, 982 (1959).Google Scholar
- 8.L. G. Radosevich and W. S. Williams,Phys. Rev. 188, 770 (1969).Google Scholar
- 9.L. Tewordt and Th. Wölkhausen,Solid State Commun. 70, 839 (1989).Google Scholar
- 10.L. Tewordt and Th. Wölkhausen,Solid State Commun. 75, 515 (1990).Google Scholar
- 11.S. D. Peacor, R. A. Richardson, F. Nori, and C. Uher,Phys. Rev. B 44, 9508 (1991).Google Scholar
- 12.R. C. Yu, M. B. Salamon, J. P. Lu, and W. C. Lee,Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1431 (1992).Google Scholar
- 13.S. J. Hagen, Z. Z. Wang, and N. P. Ong,Phys. Rev. B 40, 9389 (1989).Google Scholar
- 14.M. Sera, S. Shamoto, and M. Sato,Solid State Commun. 74, 951 (1990).Google Scholar
- 15.Cao Shao-Chun, Zhang Dong-Ming, Zhang Dian-Lin, H. M. Duan, and A. M. Hermann,Phys. Rev. B 44, 12571 (1991).Google Scholar
- 16.N. V. Zavaritskii, A. V. Samoilov, and A. A. Yurgens,Sov. Phys. JETP Lett. 48, 242 (1988).Google Scholar
- 17.B. Salce, R. Calemczuk, C. Ayache, E. Bonjour, J. Y. Henry, M. Raki, L. Forro, M. Couach, A. F. Khoder, B. Barbara, P. Burlet, M. J. M. Jurgens, and J. Rossat-Mignod,Physica C 153–155, 1014 (1988).Google Scholar
- 18.C. M. Varma, P. B. Littlewood, S. Schmitt-Rink, E. Abrahams, and A. Ruskenstein,Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1996 (1989).Google Scholar
- 19.S. Wermbter and L. Tewordt,Physica C 183, 365 (1991).Google Scholar
- 20.D. A. Bonn, P. Dosanjh, R. Liang, and W. N. Hardy,Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2390 (1992).Google Scholar
- 21.D. A. Bonn, R. Liang, T. M. Riseman, D. J. Baar, D. C. Morgan, K. Zhang, P. Dosanjh, T. L. Duty, A. MacFarlane, G. D. Morris, J. H. Brewer, W. N. Hardy, C. Kallin, and A. J. Berlinsky,Phys. Rev. B 41, 11314 (1993).Google Scholar
- 22.L. P. Kadanoff and P. C. Martin,Phys. Rev. 124, 670 (1961); L. Tewordt,Phys. Rev. 128, 12 (1962).Google Scholar
- 23.G. L. Eesley,Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 2140 (1983).Google Scholar
- 24.J. M. Chwalek, C. Uher, J. F. Whitaker, G. A. Mourou, J. Agostinelli, and M. Lelental,Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 1696 (1990).Google Scholar
- 25.C. Uher and W.-N. Huang,Phys. Rev. B 40, 2694 (1989).Google Scholar