Journal of Applied Electrochemistry

, Volume 23, Issue 6, pp 662–668 | Cite as

Transition layer thickness in microlaminar deposits

  • A. R. Despić
  • T. LJ. Trišović


A theoretical analysis was carried out on the change of composition of a deposit obtained by the dual pulse method of forming laminar metal foils, with transition from a low current to a high current pulse, both in the galvanostatic and the potentiostatic mode of deposition. It was shown that the existence of a transition layer of varying composition between a layer of pure metal 1 and a layer consisting predominantly of the metal 2 is an inherent consequence of the electrochemical process, primarily because of an induction period in the concentration polarization with respect to ions of metal 1. The importance of this transition layer increases as the thickness of the layers of the two metals decreases. Eventually this limits the possibility of obtaining a sharp boundary between the layers, when the nanometre region of layer thickness is reached. Equations are given for calculating the deposition current density and rate of stirring of the electrolyte which provide a deposit of a required level of metal 1 in the layer of metal 2, as well as a required sharpness of the boundary between two layers. Experimental proof of the correctness of the analysis was sought. It was found that significant changes in the properties of the deposit occur in the same range of layer thickness in which the transition of the composition takes places.


Layer Thickness Current Pulse Induction Period Transition Layer Concentration Polarization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


αc,1, αac,2

transfer coefficient of the cathodic processes


interfacial capacitance

C1, C2

concentration of the ions of metals 1 and 2 at the interface r

C01, C02

concentration of ions of the metals 1 and 2 in solution


diffusion coefficient for the diffusion of ions of the metal 1


reversible potentials of metals 1 and 2, respectively


the Faraday constant


exchange current density of the metals 1 and 2, respectively


atomic weights of the metals 1 and 2, respectively


kinematic viscosity of solution

ϱ1, ϱ2

densities of the metals 1 and 2 respectively


rotation speed (r.p.s.)


number of electrons exchanged in the deposition process


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    A. Brenner, ‘Electrodeposition of Alloys, Principles and Practice’, Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York (1963).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    E. Raub and K. Muller, in “Fundamentals of Metal Deposition,” Elsevier Pub. Co., New York (1967).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. S. Lashmore and O. Zadok,J. Mater. Sci. 22 (1987) 499.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. R. Despić and V. D. Jovic,J. Electrochem. Soc. 134 (1987) 3004.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    A. R. Despić, V. D. Jovic and S. Spaic,J. Electrochem. Soc. 136 (1989) 1651.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Despić, ‘Electrodeposition of Composite Structures’, Plenary lecture, 31st International Congress of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Sofia, Bulgaria (1987).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    D. Tench and J. White,Metall. Trans. A. 15 (1984) 2039.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    H. S. Carlslaw and J. C. Jaeger, ‘Conduction of Heat in Solids’, Oxford University Press, London (1947) p. 373.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, ‘Handbook of Mathematical Functions’, National Bureau of Standards, Applied Mathematics Series 55 (1964).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. R. Despić
    • 1
  • T. LJ. Trišović
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Technical Sciences of the Serbian Academy of Science and ArtsBelgradeYugoslavia

Personalised recommendations