Erkenntnis

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 285–296

The no-slip condition of fluid dynamics

  • Michael A. Day
Article

Abstract

In many applications of physics, boundary conditions have an essential role. The purpose of this paper is to examine from both a historical and philosophical perspective one such boundary condition, namely, the no-slip condition of fluid dynamics. The historical perspective is based on the works of George Stokes and serves as the foundation for the philosophical perspective. It is seen that historically the acceptance of the no-slip condition was problematic. Philosophically, the no-slip condition is interesting since the use of the no-slip condition illustrates nicely the use of scientific models. But more importantly, both the use and justification of the no-slip condition illustrate clearly how theories can holistically approach the world through model construction. Further, since much of the debate over scientific realism occurs in the realm of models, a case is made that an understanding of the role of the no-slip condition has something to offer to this debate.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boyd, R. N.: 1983, ‘On the Current Status of the Issue of Scientific Realism’,Erkenntnis 19, 45–90.Google Scholar
  2. Batchelor, G. K.: 1967,An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  3. Cartwright, N.: 1983,How the Laws of Physics Lie, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Hacking, I.: 1983,Representing and Intervening, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Hesse, M.: 1967, ‘Models and Analogy in Science’, in P.Edward (ed.),The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 5., Macmillan, New York, pp. 354–359.Google Scholar
  6. Khurana, A.: 1988, ‘Numerical Simulations Reveal Fluid Flows Near Solid Boundaries’,Physics Today 41, No. 5, 17–19.Google Scholar
  7. Kramers, H. A. and Kistemaker, J.: 1943,Physica 10, 699–713.Google Scholar
  8. Lamb, H.: 1879,A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of the Motion of Fluids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  9. Lamb, H.: 1895,Hydrodynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  10. Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz, E. M.: 1959,Fluid Mechanics, Pergamon, London.Google Scholar
  11. Leinfellner, W.: 1974, ‘A New Epitheoretical Analysis of Social Theories’, in Leinfellner and Koehler (eds.),Developments in the Methodology of Social Sciences, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 3–43.Google Scholar
  12. McMullin, E.: 1985, ‘Galilean Idealization’,Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 16, 247–273.Google Scholar
  13. Moulines, C. U.: 1975, ‘A Logical Reconstruction of Simple Equilibrium Thermodynamics’,Erkenntnis 9, 101–130.Google Scholar
  14. Sneed, J. D.: 1971,The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, (2nd edition, 1979).Google Scholar
  15. Stegmüller, W.: 1976,The Structure and Dynamics of Theories, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg-Berlin, (German edition, 1973).Google Scholar
  16. Stokes, C. G.: 1880,Mathematical and Physical Papers, Vol. I., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  17. Stokes, C. G.: 1901,Mathematical and Physical Papers, Vol. III., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  18. Whetham, W. C. D.: 1890, ‘On the Alleged Slipping at the Boundary of a Liquid in Motion’,Proceedings of the Royal Society of London XLVIII, 225–230.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael A. Day
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of PhysicsLebanon Valley CollegeAnnvilleU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations