Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 74, Issue 1–2, pp 163–180 | Cite as

Inferring the thermal-infrared hemispheric emission from a sparsely-vegetated surface by directional measurements

  • J. Otterman
  • J. Susskind
  • T. Brakke
  • D. Kimes
  • R. Pielke
  • T. J. Lee
Article
Revised:

Abstract

The thermal-infrared (longwave) emission from a vegetated terrain is generally anisotropic, i.e., the emission temperature varies with the view direction. If a directional measurement of temperature is considered to be equal to the effective temperature of the hemispheric emission, then the estimate of the latter can be significantly in error. The view-direction (zenith angleθ eq ) at which the emission equivalence does hold is determined in our modeling study. In a two-temperature field-of-view (soil and plants),θ eq falls in a narrow range depending on plant density and canopy architecture.θ eq does not depend on soil and (uniform) plant temperatures nor on their ratio, even though the pattern of emission vs. the view direction depends crucially on this ratio. For a sparse canopy represented as thin, vertical cylindrical stalks (or vertical blades uniformly distributed in azimuth) with horizontal facets,θ eq ranges from 48 to 53° depending on the optical density of the vertical elements alone. When plant elements are modeled as small spheres,θ eq lies between 53 to 57° (for the same values of the canopy optical density). Only for horizontal leaves (a truly planophile canopy) is the temperature measured from any direction equal to the temperature of the hemispheric emission. When the emission temperature changes with optical depth within the canopy at a specified rate,θ eq depends to some extent on that rate. For practically any sparsely vegetated surface, a directional measurement at the zenith angle of 50° offers an appropriate evaluation of the hemispheric emission, since the error in the estimate will, at most, only slightly exceed 1% (around 4 W m−2). Estimates of the hemispheric emission through a nadir measurement, on the other hand, can be in error in some cases by about 10%, i.e., on the order of 40 W m−2.

Keywords

Azimuth Optical Depth Plant Density Zenith Angle Effective Temperature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anton, Ya. A. and Ross, Yu. K.: 1990, ‘Emissivity of a Soil-Vegetation System’,Sov. J. Remote Sens. 7, 859–869.Google Scholar
  2. Balick, L. K. and Hutchinson, B. A.: 1986, ‘Directional Thermal Infrared Exitance Distributions from a Leafless Deciduous Forest’,IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. GE-24, 693–698.Google Scholar
  3. Deering, D. W., Eck, T. F., and Otterman, J.: 1990, ‘Bidirectional Reflectances of Selected Desert Surfaces and Their Three-Parameter Soil Characterization’,Agricultural Forest Meteorol. 52, 71–93.Google Scholar
  4. Federer, C. A.: 1971, ‘Solar Radiation Absorption by Leafless Hardwood Forests’,Agricultural Meteorol. 9, 3–20.Google Scholar
  5. Fuchs, M., Kanemasu, E. T., Kerr, J. P., and Tanner, C. B.: 1967, ‘Effect of Viewing Angle on Canopy Temperature Measurement with Infrared Thermometers’,Agron. J. 59, 494–496.Google Scholar
  6. Hall, F. G., Huemmrich, K. F., Goetz, S. J., Sellers, P. J., and Nickeson, J. E.: 1992, ‘Satellite Remote Sensing of Surface Energy Balance: Success, Failures, and Unresolved Issues in FIFE’,J. Geophys. Res. 97, 19061–19089.Google Scholar
  7. Huband, N. D. S. and Monteith, J. L.: 1986a, ‘Radiative Surface Temperature and Energy Balance of a Wheat Canopy, 1: Comparison of Radiative and Aerodynamic Temperatures’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 36, 1–17.Google Scholar
  8. Huband, N. D. S. and Monteith, J. L.: 1986b, ‘Radiative Surface Temperature and Energy Balance of a Wheat Canopy, 2: Estimating Fluxes of Sensible and Latent Heat’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 36, 107–116.Google Scholar
  9. Kimes, D. S.: 1980, ‘Effects of Vegetation Canopy Structure on Remotely Sensed Canopy Temperatures’,Remote Sens. Environ. 10, 165–174.Google Scholar
  10. Kimes, D. S.: 1981, ‘Azimuthal Radiometric Temperature Measurements of Wheat Canopies’,Appl. Opt. 7, 1119.Google Scholar
  11. Kimes, D. S. and Kirchner, J. A.: 1983, ‘Directional Radiometric Measurements of Row-Crop Temperature’,Int. J. Remote Sens. 4, 299–311.Google Scholar
  12. Kimes, D. S. and Sellers, P. J.: 1985, ‘Inferring Hemispherical Reflectance of the Earth's Surface for Global Energy Budgets from Remotely Sensed Nadir or Directional Radiance Values’,Remote Sensing Environ. 18, 205–223.Google Scholar
  13. Otterman, J.: 1981, ‘Plane with Protrusions as an Atmospheric Boundary’,J. Geophys. Res. 86, 6627–6630.Google Scholar
  14. Otterman, J.: 1983, ‘Absorption of Insolation by Land Surfaces with Sparse Vertical Protrusions’,Tellus 35B, 309–318.Google Scholar
  15. Otterman, J.: 1985, ‘Bidirectional and Hemispheric Reflectivities of a Bright Soil Plane and a Sparse Dark Canopy’,Int. J. Remote Sens. 6, 897–902.Google Scholar
  16. Otterman, J. and Tucker, J.: 1985, ‘Satellite Measurements of Surface Albedo and Temperatures in Semi Desert’,J. Climate Appl. Meteorol. 4, 228–235.Google Scholar
  17. Otterman, J., Brakke, T. W., and Susskind, J.: 1992, ‘A Model for Inferring Canopy and Underlying Soil Temperatures from Multi-Directional Measurements’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 61, 81–97.Google Scholar
  18. Rosenberg, N. J.: 1974, ‘Microclimate: The Biological Environment’, John Wiley and Sons, N. Y., 315 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Smith, J. A. and Goltz, S. M.: 1994, ‘A Thermal Exitance and Energy Balance Model for Forest Canopies’,IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 32, 1060–1066.Google Scholar
  20. Suits, G. H.: 1972, ‘The Calculation of the Directional Reflectance of a Vegetative Canopy’,Remote Sens. Environ. 2, 117–125.Google Scholar
  21. Vining, R. C. and Blad, B. L.: 1992, ‘Estimation of Sensible Heat Flux from Remotely Sensed Canopy Temperatures’,J. Geophys. Res. 97, 951–954.Google Scholar
  22. Wolfe, W. L. and Zissis, G.: 1978, ‘The Infrared Handbook’, Department of the Navy, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  23. Wu, M.-L. C. and Susskind, J.: 1990, ‘Outgoing Longwave Radiation Computed from HIRS2/MSU Soundings’,J. Geophys. Res. 95D 7579–7602.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Otterman
    • 1
  • J. Susskind
    • 2
  • T. Brakke
    • 3
  • D. Kimes
    • 3
  • R. Pielke
    • 4
  • T. J. Lee
    • 4
  1. 1.Land-Atmosphere-Ocean ResearchGreenbelt
  2. 2.Laboratory for AtmospheresNASA/GSFCGreenbeltUSA
  3. 3.Laboratory for Terrestrial PhysicsNASA/GSFCGreenbeltUSA
  4. 4.Dept. of Atmospheric SciencesColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations