Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 1–14 | Cite as

Adoption of agroforestry practices: a case study from Andhra Pradesh, India

  • J. R. R. Alavalapati
  • M. K. Luckert
  • D. S. Gill
Article

Abstract

This study analyzes factors influencing the adoption of agroforestry practices using logit analysis. In particular, the proposition that agroforestry practices have not been adopted by poor households is tested using data from West Godavari in the province of Andhra Pradesh, India. Innovation-decision process was used to guide the selection of variables used in the analysis. The results support the criticism that higher income farmers are the main beneficiaries of agroforestry if only farm forestry is considered. The results, however, do not support the criticism in the case of adoption of home gardens.

Key words

logit innovation-decision home gardens farm forestry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alavalapati JRR (1990) An analysis of factors influencing social forestry adoption: implications for forestry extension. Unpublished MSc Thesis. University of Alberta, EdmontonGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes DF, Allen TC and Ramsey W (1982) Social forestry in developing nations. Resource Discussion Paper D-73 F. Resources for the Future, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Akiva M and Lerman SR (1987) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Biswas MR and Biswas AK (1985) The skrinking forests: a threat to survival. Development and Cooperation 3: 15–17Google Scholar
  5. Bose SP (1962) Peasant values and innovation in India. American Journal of Sociology 67: 552–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chou GC (1983) Applications of Econometrics. McGraw-Hill Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Chowdhry K (1983) Social forestry and the rural poor. Discussion Paper Series No 10, Ford Foundation, New Delhi, 33 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Chowdhry K (1986) Wasteland and the rural poor: India. In: FAO (ed) Five Perspectives on Forestry for Rural Development in the Asia-Pacific Region. Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  9. D'Souza G, Cyphers D and Phipps T (1993) Factors affecting the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review (October): 159–165Google Scholar
  10. Evans PT (1988) Designing agroforestry innovations to increase their adoptability: a case study from Paraguay. Journal of Rural Studies 4(1): 45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. FAO (1978) Forestry for local community development. Forestry Paper No 7, RomeGoogle Scholar
  12. FAO (Undated) Forests, trees and people. Forestry Topics Report No 2, RomeGoogle Scholar
  13. Foley G and Barnard G (1984) Farm and community forestry. Earthscan Technical Report, No 3, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Gregerson HM (1988) People, trees, and rural development: the role of social forestry. Journal of Forestry 86(10): 22–30Google Scholar
  15. Hebden J (1983) Applications of Econometrics. Philip Allan Publishers Ltd, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoffer CR and Strangland D (1958) Farmers' attitudes and values in relation to adoption of approved practices in corn growing. Rural Sociology 23: 112–120Google Scholar
  17. Jordan CBK (1988) Forestry program fights rural poverty. Journal of Forestry 86(5): 37–40Google Scholar
  18. Maddala GS (1983) Limited-Dependent and Quantitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Raiford W (1987) Social forestry: an answer to deforestation? Development and Cooperation 4: 15–17Google Scholar
  20. Raintree JB (1983) Strategies for enhancing the adoptability of agroforestry innovations. Agroforestry Systems 1: 173–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rogers EM (1983) Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Sen D and Das PK (1987) The management of people's participation in community forestry: some issues. Network Paper No 4d. Social Forestry Network, London, ODI, 12 ppGoogle Scholar
  23. Sen D and Das PK (1988) Extension in social forestry: Problem areas and needed solutions. In: Shingi PM (ed) Planning Forestry Extension Programs India, pp 11–18. Papers presented at IIMA/FAO-RFEDP Workshop, Indian Institute of Management, AhmedabadGoogle Scholar
  24. Shiva V, Sharatchandra HC and Bandyopadhyay J (1987) Social forestry for whom? In: Korten DC (ed) Community Management: Asian Experience and Perspectives. Kumarian Press, West Hartford, ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  25. Singh KA (1985) An evaluation study on the effectiveness of social forestry program in Andhra Pradesh. Unpublished MSc Thesis. Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Hyderabad, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  26. Trivedi G (1963) Measurement of analysis of socio-economic status of rural families. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  27. White JK (1993) SHAZAM User's Reference Manual 7.0. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. R. R. Alavalapati
    • 1
  • M. K. Luckert
    • 1
  • D. S. Gill
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Rural EconomyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations