Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 3–24 | Cite as

Geometrical constraints affecting crossbridge formation in insect flight muscle

  • John C. Haselgrove
  • M. K. Reedy


Computer-modelling studies have explored how rigor crossbridge interactions in insect flight muscle are affected by using a four-stranded helical thick filament and by restricting each myosin to forming one crossbridge with only one actin filament. Crossbridges searching over an axial range of ±7.2 nm, and within an azimuthal range around actin of ±45°, can simulate the actin-labelling patterns observed in thin electron microscope sections well. However, the number of crossbridges attached between any myosin filament and an adjacent actin filament depends on their relative axial and azimuthal positions, and can vary by a factor of two. The relative position that maximized the number of attached bridges also produced the best modelling of the ‘double chevron’ appearance of two crossbridge pairs attaching within target zones every 38.6 nm, as seen in thin longitudinal sections, and the ‘flared X’ of crossbridges extending to four out of six surrounding actins at each crossbridge level seen in thin cross-sections. Micrographs show that excellent lattice register of rigor crossbridges in longitudinal sections does not depend on lateral register of thick or thin filament ends. Our modelling suggests how the crossbridge lattice may be generated by filaments becoming mutually annealed to the axial and azimuthal positions at which most crossbridges can attach, at which time the actin filaments are arranged at the diad positions of the P64 crystalline lattice. When the actin filaments are so oriented, in a P64 lattice, two crossbridges on adjacent actin filaments will slew toward the same point on the myosin filament, producing the flared X appearance of origin from a common stem and a single myosin, even if they originate from distinct points and separate molecules.


Actin Filament Thin Filament Myosin Head Flight Muscle Thick Filament 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. BARRINGTON-LEIGH, J., GOODY, R., HOFFMAN, W., HOLMES, K., MANNHERZ, H. G., ROSENBAUM, G. & TREGEAR, R. (1977) The interpretation of X-ray diffraction from glycerinated flight muscle fibre bundles: New theoretical and experimental approaches. InInsect Flight Muscle (edited by TREGEAR, R. T.), pp. 137–146. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  2. BOREJDO, J. & OPLATKA, A. (1981) Heavy meromyosin cross-links thin filaments in striated muscle myofibrilsNature Lond.,231, 322–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. CLARK, E. S. & MUUS, L. T. (1962) The relationship between Bragg reflections and disorder in crystalline polymersZ. Krist. 117, 108–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. CRAIG, R., SZENT-GYORGYI, A. G., BEESE, L., FLICKER, P., VIBERT, P. & COHEN, C. (1980) Electron microscopy of thin filaments decorated with a Ca2+-regulated myosin.J. molec. Biol. 140, 35–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. GREENE, L. & EISENBERG, E. (1980) Cooperative binding of myosin subfragment-1 to the actin-troponin-tropomyosin complex.Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 2616–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. HASELGROVE, J. C. & REEDY, M. K. (1978) Modeling rigor cross-bridge patterns in muscle. Initial studies of the rigor lattice of insect flight muscle.,Biophys. J. 24, 713–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. HOLMES, K. C., TREGEAR, R. T. & BARRINGTON-LEIGH, J. (1980) Interpretation of the low-angle diffraction from insect flight muscle.Proc. R. Soc. 207, 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. HUXLEY, H. E. (1969) The mechanism of muscle contraction.Science 164, 1356–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. LOVELL, S. J., KNIGHT, P. J. & HARRINGTON, W. F. (1981) Fraction of myosin heads bound to thin filaments in rigor fibrils from insect flight and vertebrate muscles.Nature 293, 664–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. MILLER, A. & TREGEAR, R. T. (1972) Structure of insect fibrillar flight muscle in the presence and absence of ATP.J. molec. Biol. 70, 85–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MOORE, P. B., HUXLEY, H. E. & DE ROSIER D. J. (1970) Three-dimensional reconstruction of F actin, thin filaments and decorated thin filaments,J. molec. Biol. 50, 279–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. OFFER, G., COUCH, J., O'BRIEN, E. & ELLIOTT, A. (1981) Arrangement of cross-bridges in insect flight muscle.J. molec. Biol.,151, 663–702.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. OFFER, G. & ELLIOTT, A. (1978) Can a myosin molecule bind to two actin filaments?Nature,271, 325–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. REEDY, M. K. (1967) Cross-bridges and periods in insect flight muscle.Am. Zool.,7, 465–81.Google Scholar
  15. REEDY, M. K. (1968) Ultrastructure of insect flight muscle. I. Screw sense and structural grouping in the rigor cross-bridge lattice.J. molec. Biol. 31, 155–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. REEDY, M. K. & GARRETT, W. E. (1977) Electron microscope studies ofLethocerus flight muscle in rigor. InInsect Flight Muscle (edited by TREGEAR, R. T.), pp. 115–136. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  17. REEDY, M. K., GOODY, R. S., HOFMANN, W. & ROSENBAUM, G. (1983) Co-ordinated electron microscopy and X-ray studies of glycerinated insect flight muscle. I. X-ray diffraction monitoring during preparation for electron microscopy of muscle fibres fixed in rigor, in ATP and AMPPNP.J. Musc. Res. Cell Motility 4, 25–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. REEDY, M. K., LEONARD, K. R., FREEDMAN, R. & ARAD, T. (1981) Thick myofilament mass determination by electron scattering measurements with the scanning transmission electron microscope.J. Musc. Res. Cell Motility 2, 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. SQUIRE, J. M. (1972) General model of myosin filament structure II.J. molec. Biol. 72, 125–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. SQUIRE, J. M. (1979) Organisation of myosin in the thick filaments of muscle. InFibrous Proteins, Scientific, Industrial and Medical Aspects, Vol. I (edited by PARRY, D. A. D. and CREAMER, L. K.), pp. 27–70. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. SQUIRE, J. M. (1981)The Structural Basis of Muscle Contraction, New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  22. THOMAS, D. D., COOKE, R., BARNETT, V. A. & SOMERVILLE, L. (1981) Orientation and rotational dynamics of spin-labelled myosin heads. A comparison of vertebrate striated and insect flight muscles.Biophys. J. 33, 21a.Google Scholar
  23. TRINICK, J. A. & OFFER, G. (1979) Cross-linking of actin filaments by heavy meromyosin.J. molec. Biol. 133, 549–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. WRAY, J. (1979a) Structures of the backbone in myosin filament in muscle.Nature 277, 325–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. WRAY, J. (1979b) Filament geometry and the activation of flight muscles.Nature,280, 325–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. WRAY, J., VIBERT, P. J. & COHEN, C. (1978) Actin filaments in muscle: Pattern of myosin and tropomyosin/troponin attachments.J. molec. Biol. 124, 501–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • John C. Haselgrove
    • 1
  • M. K. Reedy
    • 2
  1. 1.Johnson Research Foundation, Department of Biochemistry and BiophysicsUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnatomyDuke University Medical SchoolDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations