Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 243–256 | Cite as

Intake, digestibility, nitrogen balance and certain rumen characteristics of Ethiopian Menz sheep fed teff straw supplemented with cotton seed cake, dry sesbania, dry leucaena or fresh leucaena

  • M. L. K. Bonsi
  • P. O. Osuji
  • A. K. Tuah
  • N. N. Umunna

Abstract

Twenty five rumen fistulated Ethiopian Menz sheep were used in a completely randomized block design to determine roughage utilization when different types of supplements (sesbania, leucaena, cotton seed cake (CSC)) and forms (fresh or dry leucaena) were fed. The chemical composition, intake, digestibility, nitrogen balance and rumen degradability coefficients were determined. Rumen pH and ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) levels were estimated in samples taken at 1, 2, 3, and 6 h after feeding.

There was substitution of teff straw dry matter by the supplements. Fresh leucaena effected the highest substitution. Supplementation enhanced (p<0.05) the dry matter degradation (DD) of teff straw at 6 and 12 hours of incubation but not (p>0.06) for the other incubation times. There were no significant differences (p>0.05) between treatments in the degradation constants: readily soluble component (a) slowly degradable fraction, (b) potential degradability (PD=a+b) and rate of degradation (C) and for rumen NH3-N concentration, the ranking was CSC > sesbania > dry leucaena > fresh leucaena > teff straw alone (p<0.05). The particularly high substitution rate observed with fresh leucaena might suggest that bulkiness may be a limiting factor in the intake of low quality roughages supplemented with tree leaves. The lower DM and OM digestibilities of the supplemented diets were attributed to substrate preference by rumen cellulolytic bacteria. Excessively high levels of rumen NH3−N (328 mg/l) in the CSC diet resulted in high urinary nitrogen losses (r2=0.32;p<0.001) leading to low N balance. This may suggest that for the utilization of poor quality tropical roughages, moderate levels of rumen NH3−N sustained over a longer period may be needed.

Key words

supplementation intake digetibility dry matter degradation nitrogen utilization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abule Ebro (1994) The effects of feeding various levels of cowpea (Vigna unguiculate) and Dolichos lablab (Lablab purpureus) with a basal diet of teff straw on the growth performance of cross-bred calves. MSc Thesis. Alemaya University, Dire Dawa, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Adejumo JO and Ademosun AA (1991) Utilization of leucaena as supplement for growing dwarf sheep and goats in the humid zone of West Africa. Small Rum Res 5: 75–82Google Scholar
  3. Ahn JH, Robertson BM, Elliot R, Gutteridge RC and Ford CW (1989) Quality assessment of tropical browse legumes. Tannin content and protein degradation. Anim Feed Sci Technol 27: 147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aitchinson EM, Gill M, Dhanoa MS and Osbourn DF (1986) The effect of digestibility and forage species on the removal of digesta from the rumen and the voluntary intake of hay by sheep. Br J Nutr 56:463–476Google Scholar
  5. Ash AJ (1990) The effect of supplementation with leaves from leguminous TreesSesbania grandiflora, Albizia chinensis andGliricidia sepium on the intake and digestibility of grass hay by goats. Anim Feed Sci Technol 28: 225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (1984) Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 12th ed. AOAC, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Balch CC and Campling RC (1962) Regulation of voluntary food intake in ruminants. Nutr Abstr and Rev 32(2): 669–686Google Scholar
  8. Bamualim A, Weston RH, Hogan JP and Murray RM (1984) The contribution of Leucaena leucocephala to post-ruminal digestible protein for sheep fed tropical pasture hay supplemented with urea and minerals. Anim Prod in Austr 15: 255–258Google Scholar
  9. Baumgardt BR (1970) Control of feed intake and regulation of energy balance. In: Phillipson AT (ed) Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminants, pp 235–253. Oriel Press, Newcastle upon TyneGoogle Scholar
  10. Blaxter KL, Graham N McC and Wainman FW (1956) Some observations on the digestibility of food by sheep and on related problems. Br J Nutr 10: 69–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bonsi MLK, Osuji PO, Nsahlai IV and Tuah AK (1994) Graded levels of sesbania and leucaena in the diet of Ethiopian Menz sheep fed teff straw. Anim Prod 59: 235–244Google Scholar
  12. Bonsi MLK, Osuji PO and Tuah AK (1995) Effect of sesbania and leucaena supplements on the degradability of teff straw, sesbania, leucaena, tagasaste and vernonia and on certain rumen and blood metabolites in Ethiopian Menz sheep fed teff straw. Anim Feed Sci Technol 52: 101–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Egan AR and Moir RJ (1965) Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. I. Effect of duodenally infused single dose of casein, urea and propionate upon voluntary intake of a low-protein roughage by sheep. Austr J Agric Res 16: 437–449Google Scholar
  14. Elliot R and McMeniman MP (1987) Supplement of ruminant diets with forage. In: Hacker JB and Ternouth JH (ed) The Nutrition of Herbivores. Academic Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  15. Freer M and Campling RC (1963) Factors affecting the voluntary intake of food by cows. 3. The relationship between the voluntary intake of food, the amount of digesta in the reticulorumen and the role of disappearance of digesta from the alimentary tract with diets of hay, dried grass or concentrates. Br J Nutr 17: 79–88Google Scholar
  16. Garg MR and Gupta BN (1992) Effect of different supplements on the degradability of organic matter, cell wall constituents, in vitro gas production and organic matter digestibility of wheat straw. Anim Feed Sci Technol 38: 187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goering HK and Van Soest OJ (1970) Forage fibre analysis (Apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agricultural Handbook, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) No 379. Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Goering HK and Waldo DR (1974) Proceedings of the 1974 Cornell Nutrition Conference, p 25. Cited by Kempton TJ, Nolan JV and Leng RA (1978) Principles for the Use of Nonprotein Nitrogen and By-pass Proteins in Diets of Ruminants. FAO Anim Prod and Health Paper 12Google Scholar
  19. Henning PH, Steyn DG and Meissner HH (1993) Effect of synchronization of energy and nitrogen supply on ruminal characteristics and microbial growth. J Anim Sci 71: 2516–2528PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoover WH (1986) Chemical factors involved in ruminal fibre digestion. J Dairy Sci 69: 2755–2766PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Huhtanen P, Khalili H and Jaakkola S (1992) The effect of the forage preservation method and the proportion of concentrate on digestion of cell wall carbohydrates and rumen digesta pool size. In: Khalili H (1992) Soluble carbohydrates in the utilization of forages by cattle. PhD Thesis, Univ of Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones DIH and Wilson AD (1987) Nutritive quality of forage. In: Hacker JB and Ternouth JH (eds) The Nutrition of Herbivores. Academic Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones RJ (1979) The value of Leucaena leucocephala as a feed for ruminants in the tropics. World Anim Rev, 31: 13–23Google Scholar
  24. Kempton TJ, Nolan JV and leng RA (1978) Principles for the use of non-protein nitrogen and by-pass proteins in diets of ruminants. FAO Anim Prod and Health Paper 12 FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  25. Khalili H (1992) Soluble carbohydrates is the utilization of forages by cattle. PhD Thesis, Univ of Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  26. Lusby KS and Wagner DG (1986) Effects of supplements on feed intake. In: Owen FN (ed) Symposium Proceedings: Feed Intake by Beef Cattle, November 20–22, 1986, Oklahoma State Univ, Stillwater, OK, pp 173–181Google Scholar
  27. Mahyuddin P, Little DA and Lowry JB (1988) Drying treatment drastically affects feed evaluation and feed quality with certain tropical forage species. Anim Feed Sci Technol 22: 69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McDonald P, Edwards RA and Greenhalgh JFD (1982) Animal Nutrition 3rd ed. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. McMeniman NP, Elliot R and Ash AJ (1988) Supplementation of rice straw with crop byproducts. 1. Legume straw supplementation. Anim Feed Sci Technol 19: 43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mehrez AZ and Orskov ER (1977) A study of the artificial fibre bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen. J Agric Sci Camb 88: 645–650Google Scholar
  31. Mould FL, Orskov ER and Mann SO (1983) Associative effect of mixed feeds. I. Effects of type and level of supplementation and the influence of the rumen fluid pH on cellulolysis in vivo and dry matter digestion of various roughages. Anim Feed Sci Technol 10: 15–30Google Scholar
  32. Orskov ER (1992) Protein Nutrition in Ruminants. 2nd ed. Academic Press, London, 175 ppGoogle Scholar
  33. Orskov ER and McDonald I (1979) The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J Agric Sci Camb 92: 499–503Google Scholar
  34. Orskov ER and Ryle M (1990) Energy Nutrition in Ruminants. Elsevier Applied Science, BarkingGoogle Scholar
  35. Osuji PO and Devers C (1979) Nitrogen utilization of growing-finishing Barbados Blackbelly lambs. J Agric Sci Camb 92: 113–122Google Scholar
  36. Perdok HB, Leng RA, Bird SH, Habib G and Van Houtert M (1988) Improving livestock production from straw-based diets. In: Thomson EF and Thomson FS (eds) Increasing Small Ruminant Productivity in Semi-arid Areas. Cited by Leng RA (1989) Recent Advances in Applied Aspects of Ruminant Physiology and Nutrition. In: Devendra C and Imaizumi E (eds) Ruminant Physiology and Nutrition in AsiaGoogle Scholar
  37. Reed JD, Soller H, and Woodward A (1990) Fodder tree and straw diets for sheep: intake, growth, digestibility and the effects of phenolics on nitrogen utilisation. Anim Feed Sci Technol 30: 39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Said AN (1990) Nutritive value and use of feeds in Africa. In: Feed Resources on Small Farms in Africa. Paper presented at ILCA Nutrition course in 1990Google Scholar
  39. Satter LD and Slyter LL (1974) Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro. Br J Nutr 32: 194–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith WR, Yu I and Hungate RE (1973) Factors affecting cellulosis byRuminococus albus. J Bacterio 114: 729Google Scholar
  41. Smith OB (1991) Small ruminant feeding systems for small-scale farmers in humid West Africa. In: Stares JES, Said AN and Kategile JA (eds) Complementary of Feed Resources for Animal Production in Africa. Proceedings of the Joint Feed Resources, Gaborone, Botswana, March 1991Google Scholar
  42. Statistical Analysis System (SAS) (1987) Procedures Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6. Cary NC. SAS Institute Incorporation (1988) SAS/Stat Users Guide Release 6.03. SAS Institute Incorporation, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  43. Sutton JD, Morant SV, Bines JA, Napper DJ and Givens DI (1993) Effect of altering t fibre ratio in the concentrates on hay intake and milk production by Friesian cows, J Agric Sci Camb 120: 379–390Google Scholar
  44. Tan PV and Bryant MJ (1991) The effects of dietary supplements of fish meal on the voluntary food intake of store lambs. Anim Prod 52: 271–278Google Scholar
  45. Webster J (1984) Calf Husbandry, Health and Welfare. Granada, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Wester RH (1971) Factors limiting the intake of feed by sheep. V. Feed intake and productive performance of th ruminant lamb in relation to the quantity of crude protein digested in the intestines. Austr J Agric Res 22: 307–320Google Scholar
  47. Winer BJ (1971) Statistical Principles In Experimental Design, 2nd ed. McGraw Hill, NYGoogle Scholar
  48. Woodward A and Reed JD (1989) The influence of polyphenolics on the nutritive value of browse: A summary of research conducted at the International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA). ILCA Bulletin No 35: 2–11Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. L. K. Bonsi
    • 2
  • P. O. Osuji
    • 1
  • A. K. Tuah
    • 2
  • N. N. Umunna
    • 1
  1. 1.International Livestock Research InstituteAddis AbabaEthiopia
  2. 2.Department of Animal ScienceUSTKumasiGhana

Personalised recommendations