The civil commitment of pathologically violent sex offenders

  • Alexander D. Brooks
Articles

Abstract

This article explores the issues surrounding the Sexually Violent Predator Statute enacted by the Washington state legislature. The statute provides for the confinement of violent and dangerous sex offenders who are also mentally abnormal or psychopathic. As other states are also considering comparable legislation, this article discusses the legal ramifications of such legislation.

Keywords

Public Health State Legislature Washington State Civil Commitment Legal Ramification 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen v. Illinois, 478 U.S. 364 (1986).Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (1987).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed. rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Boerner, D. (1992). Confronting violence: In the act and in the word.University of Puget Sound Law Review, 15, 525–535.Google Scholar
  4. Brooks, A. (1992). The constitutionality and morality of civilly committing violent sexual predators.University of Puget Sound Law Review, p. 709.Google Scholar
  5. Foucha v. Louisiana, 112 S.Ct. 1780 (1992).Google Scholar
  6. In Re Harris, 98 Wash. 2d 276, 654 P. 2d 109 (1982).Google Scholar
  7. In Re Young, 122 Wash. 2d 1, 857 p. 2d 989 (1993).Google Scholar
  8. Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715 (1972).Google Scholar
  9. O'Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 (1975).Google Scholar
  10. Predators and politics: A symposium on Washington's sexually violent predators statute.University of Puget Sound Law Review, 15, 507–911.Google Scholar
  11. Robinson. (1993). The criminal-civil distinction and dangerous blameless offenders.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 693.Google Scholar
  12. Sexually Violent Predator Statute, Wash. Rev. Code ch. 71.09 (Supp. 1990–1991).Google Scholar
  13. State v. Pryor, 115 Wash. 2d 445, 454, 799 P. 2d 244 (1990)Google Scholar
  14. U.S. v. Jones, 463 U.S. 354 (1983).Google Scholar
  15. U.S. v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 (1987).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander D. Brooks
    • 1
  1. 1.Law Emeritus at Rutgers University Law SchoolS.I. Newhouse Center for Law and JusticeNewark

Personalised recommendations