Chromosome Research

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 15–26 | Cite as

Segregation of holocentric chromosomes at meiosis in the nematode,Caenorhabditis elegans

  • Donna G. Albertson
  • J. Nichol Thomson
Research Papers


The meiotic segregation of the holocentric chromosomes ofCaenorhabditis elegans in both spermatogenesis and oogenesis is described. The extended kinetochore typical of the mitotic chromosome could not be differentiated on meiotic bivalents; instead microtubules appeared to project into the chromatin. The meiotic spindles formed during spermatogenesis contain centrioles and asters, while in oogenesis the spindles are acentriolar and barrel shaped. The formation of the acentriolar spindle was studied in fixed specimens by anti-tubulin immunofluorescence. Microtubule arrays were seen first to accumulate in the vicinity of the meiotic chromosomes prior to congression. At later stages, elongated spindle structures up to 13 μ in length were observed parallel to the surface of the embryo. Further development of the spindle appeared to involve its shortening into a barrel shape and rotation so that one spindle pole was opposed to the membrane. By anaphase the pole-to-pole spindle length reached a minimum of 3–4 μ. One end of each chromatid in the meiotic bivalent was labelled byin situ hybridization of a probe DNA to show that in oogenesis the chromatids were associated end-to-end in the bivalent. Furthermore, either the right or the left ends of the homologues could be held in association. At metaphase I the bivalents were oriented axially, such that kinetic activity was restricted to one end of each pair of sister chromatids. At metaphase II the chromosomes were also aligned axially.

Key words

Caenorhabditis elegans holocentric chromosomes meiotic segregation oogenesis spermatogenesis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albertson DG (1984a) Formation of the first cleavage spindle in nematode embryos.Dev Biol 101: 61–72.Google Scholar
  2. Albertson DG (1984b) Localization of the ribosomal genes inCaenorhabditis elegans chromosomes byin situ hybridization using biotin-labeled probes.EMBO J 3: 1227–1234.Google Scholar
  3. Albertson DG, Thomson JN (1982) The kinetochores ofCaenorhabditis elegans.Chromosoma 86: 409–428.Google Scholar
  4. Albertson DG, Sulston JE, White JG (1978) Cell cycling and DNA replication in a mutant blocked in cell division in the nematodeCaenorhabditis elegans.Dev Biol 63: 165–178.Google Scholar
  5. Bernhard W (1969) A new staining procedure for electron microscopical cytology.J Ultrastruct Res 27: 250–265.Google Scholar
  6. Bokhari CJ, Godward MBE (1980) The ultrastructure of the diffuse kinetochore inLuzula nivea.Chromosoma 79: 125–136.Google Scholar
  7. Bostock CJ, Sumner AT (1978)The Eukaryotic Chromosome. North-Holland, New York. pp. 278–279.Google Scholar
  8. Braselton JP (1971) The ultrastructure of the non-localized kinetochores ofLuzula andCyperus.Chromsoma 36: 89–99.Google Scholar
  9. Braselton JP (1981) The ultrastructure of the meiotic kinetochores ofLuzula.Chromosoma 82: 143–151.Google Scholar
  10. Brenner S (1974) The genetics ofCaenorhabditis elegans.Genetics 77: 71–94.Google Scholar
  11. Endow SA, Henikoff S, Soler-Niedziela L (1990) Mediation of meiotic and early mitotic chromosome segregation inDrosophila by a protein related to kinesin.Nature 345: 81–83.Google Scholar
  12. Files JG, Hirsh D (1981) Ribosomal DNA ofCaenorhabditis elegans.J Mol Biol 149: 223–240.Google Scholar
  13. Gard DL (1992) Microtuble organization during maturation ofXenopus oocytes: assembly and rotation of the meiotic spindles.Dev Biol 151: 516–530.Google Scholar
  14. Goday C, Ciofi-Luzzatto A, Pimpinelli S (1985) Centromere ultrastructure in germ-line chromosomes ofParascaris.Chromosoma 91: 121–125.Google Scholar
  15. Goday C, Pimpinelli S (1989) Centromere organization in meiotic chromosomes ofParascaris univalens.Chromosoma 98: 160–166.Google Scholar
  16. Godward MBE (1985) The kinetochore.Int Rev Cytol 94: 77–104.Google Scholar
  17. Goldstein P (1978) Ultrastructural analysis of sex determination inAscaris lumbricoides varsuum.Chromosoma 66: 59–69.Google Scholar
  18. Goldstein P, Triantaphyllou A (1980) The ulstrastructure of sperm development in the plant-parasitic nematodeMeloidogyne hapla.J. Ultrastruct Res 71: 143–153.Google Scholar
  19. Herman RK, Albertson DG, Brenner S (1976) Chromsome rearrangements inCaenorhabditis elegans.Genetics 83: 91–105.Google Scholar
  20. Herman RK, Kari C, Hartman PS (1982) Dominant X chromosome nondisjunction mutants ofCaenorhabditis elegans.Genetics 102: 379–400.Google Scholar
  21. Herman RK, Madl JE, Kari C (1979) Duplications inCaenorhabditis elegans.Genetics 92: 419–435.Google Scholar
  22. Hodgkin JH, Horvitz HRH, Brenner S (1979) Nondisjunction mutants of the nematodeCaenorhabditis elegans.Genetics 91: 67–94.Google Scholar
  23. Hughes-Schrader S (1948) Cytology of coccids.Adv Genet 2: 127–203.Google Scholar
  24. Hughes-Schrader S, Schrader F (1961) The kinetochore of the Hemiptera.Chromosoma 12: 327–350.Google Scholar
  25. Jamuar MP (1966) Studies of spermatogenesis in a nematode,Nippostrongylus brasiliensis.J Cell Biol 31: 381–396.Google Scholar
  26. Johnson GD, Davidson RS, McNamee KCet al. (1982) Fading of immunofluorescence during microscopy: a study of the phenomenon and its remedy.J Immunol Methods 55: 231–242.Google Scholar
  27. Karsenti E, Newport J, Hubble Ret al. (1984) Interconversion of metaphase and interphase microtubule arrays, as studied by the injection of centrosomes and nuclei intoXenopus eggs.J Cell Biol 98: 1730–1745.Google Scholar
  28. Kimble JE, White JG (1981). On the control of germ cell development inCaenorhabditis elegans.Dev Biol 81: 208–219.Google Scholar
  29. Lutz DA, Hamaguchi Y, Inoue S (1988) Micromanipulation studies of the asymmetric positioning of the maturation spindle inChaetopterus sp. oocytes: I. Anchorage of the spindle to the cortex and migration of a displaced spindle.Cell Motil Cytoskel 11: 83–96.Google Scholar
  30. McKim KS, Howell AM, Rose AM (1988) The effects of translocations on recombination frequency inCaenorhabditis elegans.Genetics 120: 987–1001.Google Scholar
  31. Neill BW, Wright KA (1973) Spermatogenesis in the hologonic testis of the Trichuroid nematode,Capillaria hepatica (Bancroft, 1893).J Ultrastruct Res 44: 210–234.Google Scholar
  32. Nicklas RB, Gordon GW (1985) The total length of spindle microtubules depends on the number of chromosomes present.J Cell Biol 100: 1–7.Google Scholar
  33. Nigon V, Brun J (1955) L'évolution des structures nucléaires dans l'ovogenèse deCaenorhabditis elegans Maupas (1900).Chromosoma 7: 129–169.Google Scholar
  34. Nokkala S (1985) Restriction of kinetic activity of holokinetic chromosomes in meiotic cells and its structural basis.Hereditas 102: 85–88.Google Scholar
  35. Ris H (1942) A cytological and experimental analysis of the meiotic behavior of the univalent X chromosome in the bearberry aphidTamalia (=Phyllaphis)coweni (Ckll.).J Exp Zool 90: 267–330.Google Scholar
  36. Sawada T, Schatten G (1988) Microtubules in Ascidian eggs during meiosis, fertilization, and mitosis.Cell Motil Cytoskel 9: 219–230.Google Scholar
  37. Sawain KE, Mitchison TJ (1991) Mitotic spindle assembly by two different pathwaysin vitro.J Cell Biol 112: 925–940.Google Scholar
  38. Schatten G, Simerly C, Schatten H (1985) Microtubule configurations during fertilization, mitosis, and early development in the mouse and the requirement for egg microtubule-mediated motility during mammalian fertilization.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82: 4152–4156.Google Scholar
  39. Sigurdson DC, Herman RK, Horton CAet al. (1986) An X-autosome fusion chromosome ofCaenorhabditis elegans.Mol Gen Genet 202: 212–218.Google Scholar
  40. Stevens BJ, White JG (1979) Computer reconstruction of mitochondria from yeast.Methods Enzymol 56: 718–728.Google Scholar
  41. Theurkauf WE, Hawley RS (1992) Meiotic spindle assembly inDrosophila females: Behavior of nonexchange chromosomes and the effects of mutations in thenod kinesin-like protein.J Cell Biol 116: 1167–1180.Google Scholar
  42. Triantaphyllou AC (1971) Genetics and Cytology. InPlant Parasitic Nematodes. Zuckerman BM, Mae WF, Rhode RA, eds. Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
  43. Triantaphyllou AC, Hirschmann H (1966) Gametogenesis and reproduction in the wheat nematode,Anguina tritici.Nematologica 12: 437–442.Google Scholar
  44. Verde F, Berrez J-M, Antony Cet al. (1991) Taxo-induced microtubule asters in mitotic extracts ofXenopus eggs: requirement for phosphorylated factors and cytoplasmic dynein.J Cell Biol 112: 1177–1187.Google Scholar
  45. Ward S, Thomson N, White JGet al. (1975) Electron microscopical reconstruction of the anterior sensory anatomy of the nematodeCaenorhabditis elegans.J Comp Neurol 160: 313–338.Google Scholar
  46. White MJD (1973)Animal Cytology and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 490–494.Google Scholar
  47. Wolf N, Hirsh D, Mclntosh JR (1978) Spermatogenesis in males of the free-living nematode,Caenorhabditis elegans.J Ultrastruct Res 63: 55–169.Google Scholar
  48. Wolpert L (1960) The mechanics and mechanism of cleavage.Int Rev Cytol 10: 163–216.Google Scholar
  49. Wood WB (1988)The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor pp. 667.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rapid Communications of Oxford Ltd 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.the MRC Laboratory of Molecular BiologyCambridgeUK
  2. 2.MRC Molecular Genetics UnitCambridge

Personalised recommendations